Guideline Implementation: Minimally Invasive Surgery, Part 2-Hybrid ORs 1.1

被引:1
|
作者
Cowperthwaite, Liz [1 ]
Fearon, Mary C. [2 ]
机构
[1] AORN Inc, Denver, CO 80231 USA
[2] AORN Inc, Dept Nursing, Denver, CO USA
关键词
hybrid OR; intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging; no-fly zone; MRI screening; HYBRID OPERATING-ROOM; INTRAOPERATIVE MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.aorn.2017.06.006
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Performing both surgical and imaging procedures in a hybrid OR can increase efficiency by reducing the number of patient transfers between departments and the number of patient hand overs between personnel. A hybrid OR is, however, a complex environment that requires integrating the knowledge and skills of personnel from multiple disciplines to create a successful workflow. When magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) equipment is installed in the hybrid OR, additional precautions are required to help ensure the environment is safe for patients and personnel. AORN's updated "Guideline for minimally invasive surgery" provides guidance for personnel designing and working in hybrid ORs and MRI hybrid ORs. This article focuses on key points of the guideline that address hybrid OR configuration, hybrid OR staffing, and mitigating risks associated with intraoperative MRI. Perioperative RNs should review the complete guideline for additional information and for guidance when writing and updating policies and procedures. (C) AORN, Inc, 2017.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 150
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Minimally Invasive Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Europe Implementation and Outcomes
    Babaei, Masoud
    Balavarca, Yesilda
    Jansen, Lina
    Gondos, Adam
    Lemmens, Valery
    Sjovall, Annika
    Johannesen, Tom Borge
    Moreau, Michel
    Gabriel, Liberale
    Goncalves, Ana Filipa
    Bento, Maria Jose
    van de Velde, Tony
    Kempfer, Lana Raffaela
    Becker, Nikolaus
    Ulrich, Alexis
    Ulrich, Cornelia M.
    Schrotz-King, Petra
    Brenner, Hermann
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (22)
  • [32] Special problems in minimally invasive surgery of the foregut: Part I
    Schirmer, B
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2001, 5 (02) : 214 - 215
  • [33] The Role of Technology in the Implementation and Learning of Minimally-Invasive Surgery
    Crisan, N.
    Andras, I.
    Coman, I.
    NEW TRENDS IN MEDICAL AND SERVICE ROBOTS: DESIGN, ANALYSIS AND CONTROL, 2018, 48 : 45 - 57
  • [34] Barriers to diffusion and implementation of pediatric minimally invasive surgery in Brazil
    Rombaldi, Marcelo Costamilan
    Barreto, Caroline Gargioni
    Rombaldi, Renato Luis
    Costa, Eduardo Correa
    Holanda, Felipe
    Cavazzola, Leandro Totti
    Fraga, Jose Carlos
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [35] The role of minimally invasive surgery in oncology – part 1: laparoscopy
    Maureen A. Griffin
    William T. N. Culp
    Nicole J. Buote
    Veterinary Oncology, 2 (1):
  • [36] Special problems in minimally invasive surgery of the foregut: Part I
    Bruce Schirmer
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2001, 5 : 214 - 215
  • [37] A multidisciplinary evidence-based guideline for minimally invasive surgery: part 2-laparoscopic port instruments, trocar site closure, and electrosurgical techniques
    la Chapelle, Claire F.
    Bemelman, Willem A.
    Bongers, Marlies Y.
    van Barneveld, Teus A.
    Jansen, Frank Willem
    GYNECOLOGICAL SURGERY, 2013, 10 (01) : 11 - 23
  • [38] Hybrid Soft-Rigid Actuators for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    Paterno, Linda
    Tortora, Giuseppe
    Menciassi, Arianna
    SOFT ROBOTICS, 2018, 5 (06) : 783 - 799
  • [39] Next step in minimally invasive surgery: hybrid image-guided surgery
    Marescaux, Jacques
    Diana, Michele
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2015, 50 (01) : 30 - 36
  • [40] Safe implementation of minimally invasive surgery in a specialized colorectal cancer unit
    José Azevedo
    Anna Kashpor
    Laura Fernandez
    Ignacio Herrando
    Pedro Vieira
    Hugo Domingos
    Carlos Carvalho
    Richard Heald
    Amjad Parvaiz
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2024, 28 (1)