A composite critical-size rabbit mandibular defect for evaluation of craniofacial tissue regeneration

被引:47
|
作者
Shah, Sarita R. [1 ]
Young, Simon [2 ]
Goldman, Julia L. [3 ]
Jansen, John A. [4 ]
Wong, Mark E. [2 ]
Mikos, Antonios G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rice Univ, Dept Bioengn, Houston, TX 77005 USA
[2] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Ctr Lab Anim Med & Care, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Biomat, Nijmegen, Netherlands
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1038/nprot.2016.122
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Translational biomaterials targeted toward the regeneration of large bone defects in the mandible require a preclinical model that accurately recapitulates the regenerative challenges present in humans. Computational modeling and in vitro assays do not fully replicate the in vivo environment. Consequently, in vivo models can have specific applications such as those of the mandibular angle defect, which is used to investigate bone regeneration in a nonload-bearing area, and the inferior border mandibular defect, which is a model for composite bone and nerve regeneration, with both models avoiding involvement of soft tissue or teeth. In this protocol, we describe a reproducible load-bearing critical-size composite tissue defect comprising loss of soft tissue, bone and tooth in the mandible of a rabbit. We have previously used this procedure to investigate bone regeneration, vascularization and infection prevention in response to new biomaterial formulations for craniofacial tissue engineering applications. This surgical approach can be adapted to investigate models such as that of regeneration in the context of osteoporosis or irradiation. The procedure can be performed by researchers with basic surgical skills such as dissection and suturing. The procedure takes 1.5-2 h, with similar to 2 h of immediate postoperative care, and animals should be monitored daily for the remainder of the study. For bone tissue engineering applications, tissue collection typically occurs 12 weeks after surgery. In this protocol, we will present the necessary steps to ensure reproducibility; tips to minimize complications during and after surgery; and analytical techniques for assessing soft tissue, bone and vessel regeneration by gross evaluation, microcomputed tomography (microCT) and histology.
引用
收藏
页码:1989 / 2009
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Osteoactivin-induced bone regeneration in a rat model of critical-size cranial defect.
    Baterman, J. P.
    Arango-Hisijara, I.
    Wikesjö, U. M.
    Barbe, M. F.
    Popoff, S. N.
    Safadi, F. F.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2006, 21 : S343 - S343
  • [22] Comparative Evaluation of Nanofibrous Scaffolding for Bone Regeneration in Critical-Size Calvarial Defects
    Woo, Kyung Mi
    Chen, Victor J.
    Jung, Hong-Moon
    Kim, Tae-Il
    Shin, Hong-In
    Baek, Jeong-Hwa
    Ryoo, Hyun-Mo
    Ma, Peter X.
    TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A, 2009, 15 (08) : 2155 - 2162
  • [23] Bioactive Scaffolds as a Promising Alternative for Enhancing Critical-Size Bone Defect Regeneration in the Craniomaxillofacial Region
    Bello, Samir A.
    Cruz-Lebron, Junellie
    Rodriguez-Rivera, Osvaldo A.
    Nicolau, Eduardo
    ACS APPLIED BIO MATERIALS, 2023, 6 (11) : 4465 - 4503
  • [24] Repair of critical-size porcine craniofacial bone defects using a collagen-polycaprolactone composite biomaterial
    Dewey, Marley J.
    Milner, Derek J.
    Weisgerber, Daniel
    Flanagan, Colleen L.
    Rubessa, Marcello
    Lotti, Sammi
    Polkoff, Kathryn M.
    Crotts, Sarah
    Hollister, Scott J.
    Wheeler, Matthew B.
    Harley, Brendan A. C.
    BIOFABRICATION, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [25] Critical-Size Defects of Animal Models for Bone Regeneration
    Lv, Zhao-Yong
    Chen, Xi-Meng
    Zhang, Yu-Jue
    Li, June
    Zhao, Zhong-Hui
    Li, Ke-Yi
    Xie, Guan-Nan
    Liu, Feng-Zhen
    Zhang, Bin
    JOURNAL OF BIOMATERIALS AND TISSUE ENGINEERING, 2018, 8 (06) : 761 - 770
  • [26] A nasal critical-size defect - An experimental model for the evaluation of facial osseous repair techniques
    Lindsey, WH
    Franz, DA
    Toung, JS
    London, SD
    Ogle, RO
    ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 1998, 124 (08) : 912 - 915
  • [27] Free Transplantation of a Tissue Engineered Bone Graft into an Irradiated, Critical-Size Femoral Defect in Rats
    Rottensteiner-Brandl, Ulrike
    Bertram, Ulf
    Lingens, Lara F.
    Koehn, Katrin
    Distel, Luitpold
    Fey, Tobias
    Koerner, Carolin
    Horch, Raymund E.
    Arkudas, Andreas
    CELLS, 2021, 10 (09)
  • [28] Testing the Critical Size in Calvarial Bone Defects: Revisiting the Concept of a Critical-Size Defect
    Cooper, Gregory M.
    Mooney, Mark P.
    Gosain, Arun K.
    Campbell, Phil G.
    Losee, Joseph E.
    Huard, Johnny
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 125 (06) : 1685 - 1692
  • [29] Bone regeneration induced by a 3D architectured hydrogel in a rat critical-size calvarial defect
    Lohmann, P.
    Willuweit, A.
    Neffe, A. T.
    Geisler, S.
    Gebauer, T. P.
    Beer, S.
    Coenen, H. H.
    Fischer, H.
    Hermanns-Sachweh, B.
    Lendlein, A.
    Shah, N. J.
    Kiessling, F.
    Langen, K. - J.
    BIOMATERIALS, 2017, 113 : 158 - 169
  • [30] Biomechanical validation of a tibial critical-size defect model in minipigs
    Ribeiro, Marx
    Grotheer, Vera Cora
    Nicolini, Luis Fernando
    Latz, David
    Pishnamaz, Miguel
    Greven, Johannes
    Taday, Roman
    Wergen, Niklas Markus
    Hildebrand, Frank
    Windolf, Joachim
    Jungbluth, Pascal
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2024, 120