Meta-analysis of serum non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and risk of coronary heart disease in the general population

被引:19
|
作者
Liu, Hongtao [1 ]
Deng, Xia [2 ]
Peng, Yudong [3 ]
Zeng, Qiutang [3 ]
Song, Zongren [1 ]
He, Wenping [1 ]
Zhang, Le [1 ]
Gao, Gan [1 ]
Xiao, Ting [1 ]
Yu, Xuedong [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Med Univ, Shenzhen Longhua Dist Cent Hosp, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Longhua Cent Hosp Affiliated, 187 Guanlan Ave, Shenzhen 518110, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Guangdong Med Univ, Shenzhen Longhua Dist Cent Hosp, Pharm Dept, Longhua Cent Hosp Affiliated, Shenzhen 518110, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Union Hosp, Dept Inst Cardiovasc Dis, Wuhan 430022, Hubei, Peoples R China
关键词
Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; Coronary heart disease; Meta-analysis; NON-HDL CHOLESTEROL; CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; JAPANESE; ASSOCIATION; PREDICTION; EVENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cca.2017.05.006
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) has been proposed an independent risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD). However, the magnitude of this association in the general population varied considerably. Objective: To investigate the association of baseline non-HDL-C level with CHD risk in the general population by conducting a meta-analysis. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed in the Pubmed and Embase until January 2017. Prospective observational studies that investigated the association between baseline non-HDL-C level and CHD risk in the general population were included. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for the highest vs. the lowest non-HDL-C category. Results: Seven articles with 9 independent prospective studies involving 448,732 individuals were included. Meta-analysis showed that individuals with the highest non-HDL-C level at baseline were associated with greater risk of CHD (RR 1.79; 95% CI 1.68-1.91) than those in the lowest non-HDL-C level category. Subgroup analysis suggested that the risk of CHD seemed more pronounced among men (HR 1.98; 95% CI 1.70-2.30) than among women (HR 1.63; 95% CI 1.35-1.96). Conclusions: Higher baseline non-HDL-C level is associated with increased risk of CHD in the general population. This risk seems more pronounced in men than in women. However, gender difference in non-HDL-C level associated with CHD risk should be verified by more well-designed prospective studies.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 28
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Relationship between Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in the General Population: the KOBE Study and Tsuruoka Metabolomic Cohort Study
    Kuwabara, Kazuyo
    Harada, Sei
    Sugiyama, Daisuke
    Kurihara, Ayako
    Kubota, Yoshimi
    Higashiyama, Aya
    Hirata, Takumi
    Nishida, Yoko
    Kawasaki, Midori
    Takebayashi, Toru
    Okamura, Tomonori
    JOURNAL OF ATHEROSCLEROSIS AND THROMBOSIS, 2016, 23 (04) : 477 - 490
  • [42] Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level as a predictor of cardiovascular disease mortality
    Cui, YD
    Blumenthal, RS
    Flaws, JA
    Whiteman, MK
    Langenberg, P
    Bachorik, PS
    Bush, TL
    ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 161 (11) : 1413 - 1419
  • [43] Management of persons with high risk of coronary heart disease but low serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
    Case, CC
    Jacobson, TA
    Roberts, S
    Buckley, A
    Murtaugh, KM
    Sung, JCY
    Gause, D
    Varas, C
    Ballantyne, CM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 91 (09): : 1134 - 1136
  • [44] Joint effect of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol on the risk of coronary heart disease
    Hu, Gang
    Cui, Yadong
    Jousilahti, Pekka
    Sundvall, Jouko
    Girman, Cynthia J.
    Antikainen, Riitta
    Laatikainen, Tiina
    Tuomilehto, Jaakko
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 20 (01) : 89 - 97
  • [45] Association of trajectories of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration with risk of cardiovascular disease: the Kailuan Study
    Ding, Xiong
    Zhou, Hui
    Yue, Qing
    Shu, Zhe
    Ma, Xiaoxu
    Li, Yun
    Wu, Shouling
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (04):
  • [46] Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, Triglycerides, and Apolipoprotein B and Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With Manifest Arterial Disease
    van den Berg, M. Johanneke
    van der Graaf, Yolanda
    de Borst, Gert Jan
    Kappelle, L. Jaap
    Nathoe, Hendrik M.
    Visseren, Frank L. J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 118 (06): : 804 - 810
  • [47] Apolipoprotein B and Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Are Better Risk Markers for Coronary Artery Disease than Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Hypertriglyceridemic Metabolic Syndrome Patients
    Boumaiza, Imen
    Omezzine, Asma
    Rejeb, Jihene
    Rebhi, Lamia
    Kalboussi, Nesrine
    Ben Rejeb, Nabila
    Nabli, Naoufel
    Ben Abdelaziz, Ahmed
    Boughazala, Essia
    Bouslama, Ali
    METABOLIC SYNDROME AND RELATED DISORDERS, 2010, 8 (06) : 515 - 522
  • [48] Age and Cardiovascular Risk Attributable to Apolipoprotein B, Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol or Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
    Sniderman, Allan D.
    Islam, Shofiqul
    McQueen, Matthew
    Pencina, Michael
    Furberg, Curt D.
    Thanassoulis, George
    Yusuf, Salim
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2016, 5 (10):
  • [49] Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Risk of Stroke Subtypes and Coronary Heart Disease The Japan Public Health Center-Based Prospective (JPHC) Study
    Saito, Isao
    Yamagishi, Kazumasa
    Kokubo, Yoshihiro
    Yatsuya, Hiroshi
    Iso, Hiroyasu
    Sawada, Norie
    Inoue, Manami
    Tsugane, Shoichiro
    JOURNAL OF ATHEROSCLEROSIS AND THROMBOSIS, 2020, 27 (04) : 363 - 374
  • [50] Distribution and correlates of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in children: The Bogalusa Heart Study
    Srinivasan, SR
    Myers, L
    Berenson, GS
    PEDIATRICS, 2002, 110 (03) : e29