Using a 3D diode array system to verify 3D dose distribution

被引:1
|
作者
Xue, T. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Lukes Hosp, Bethlehem, PA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1118/1.2761161
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: We have been used a 3D diode array to verify 3D dose distributions from IMRT plans, and SRS plans using conical arcs or dynamical arcs. Some of the results are reported here. We are also going to study the possibility of using this diode array for routine QA of the treatment machine and the treatment planning system. Method and Materials: IMRT plans are developed on Varian Eclipse, and delivered on Varian Trilogy treatment unit by using sliding window technique. The SRS plans are developed on a BrainLab IPlan Dose, and delivered on the Trilogy. The 3D diode array is the Delta4 system from Scandidos. Delta4 has 1069 type Si diodes on two planes in a cylindrical PMMA phantom. In the treatment planning systems, a patient plan is copied to the phantom, and recalculated. The plan and dose distribution are transferred to the Delta4 system by using DICOM RT. In the Delta4 software, the planned dose and measured dose are compared by using 2D isodose display, profile comparisons, percentage dose deviation, and DTA and Gamma index. Results: We have used this method to verify 61 IMRT plans. The average percent diodes with deviation of 5% or less is 84.5%; the average distance to agreement (DTA) of 3mm or less is 86.7%. The average Gamma Index (5% and 3mm) of 1.0 or less is 91.8%. We have also used this system to verify the isocenter dose of BrainLab SRS plans, each using a cone from 7.5 mm to 30 mm with 180 degree arc. The average absolute difference between measurement and plan isocenter dose is 1.8%. Conclusion: The 3D diode system is a good tool to verify 3D dose distribution. © 2007, American Association of Physicists in Medicine. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2502 / 2502
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Registration Using Nanotube Stationary Tomosynthesis: Comparison of 3D/3D to 3D/2D Methods
    Frederick, B.
    Lalush, D.
    Chang, S.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06)
  • [42] 3D registration by using an alternative 3D shape representation
    Torre-Ferrero, C.
    Robla, S.
    Sarabia, E. G.
    Llata, J. R.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY AND ARTIFICIAL VISION (ISCGAV'-07), 2007, : 97 - +
  • [43] 3D Analysis of Tooth Movement Using 3D Technology
    Kau, Chung How
    Wilma, David A. Cruz
    [J]. CURRENT OSTEOPOROSIS REPORTS, 2020,
  • [44] 3D landscape modelling using JAVA 3D/VRML
    Punia M.
    Pandey D.
    [J]. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 2006, 34 (4) : 397 - 403
  • [45] Simplifying 3D Bolus Creation Using 3D Slicer
    Koistinen, P.
    Koistinen, M.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E659 - E659
  • [46] 3D Pose Tracking Using a Recovered 3D Model
    Chen, Wei
    Zhao, Yuelong
    Chen, Shu
    Ouyang, Jianquan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CIRCUITS SYSTEMS AND COMPUTERS, 2018, 27 (04)
  • [47] Development of 3D shadow mask using 3D printer
    Sowmya, N.
    Oraon, Neha
    Sen, Subhajit
    Rao, Madhav
    [J]. 2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONICS, COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES (CONECCT), 2015,
  • [48] Determinants of 3D Principal Strain, 3D Circumferential, 3D Longitudinal, and 3D Radial Strains
    Gopal, Aasha S.
    Toole, Rena S.
    Reichek, Nathaniel
    Cao, Jie J.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2011, 124 (21)
  • [49] EVALUATION OF A 3D DIODE ARRAY DOSIMETER FOR HELICAL TOMOTHERAPY DELIVERY QA
    Feygelman, Vladimir
    Opp, D.
    Javedan, K.
    Saini, A. J.
    Zhang, G.
    [J]. MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2010, 35 (04) : 324 - 329
  • [50] Skeletonization of 3D Images using 2.5D and 3D Algorithms
    Khan, Mohd. Sherfuddin
    Mankar, Vijay H.
    Prashanthi, G.
    Sathya, G.
    [J]. 2015 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NEXT GENERATION COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES (NGCT), 2015, : 971 - 975