THE COMPARISON OF SPATIAL INTERPOLATION METHODS IN APPLICATION TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF DIGITAL TERRAIN MODELS

被引：0
|
作者：
Cichocinski, Piotr [1 ]
Basista, Izabela [1 ]
机构：
[1] AGH Univ Sci & Technol, PL-30059 Krakow, Poland
来源：
GEOCONFERENCE ON INFORMATICS, GEOINFORMATICS AND REMOTE SENSING - CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, VOL I | 2013年
关键词：
geographic information system; free software; open source; topographic surface; ELEVATION MODEL;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号：
07 ;
摘要：
The paper presents the results of the study aiming at finding alternative methods to interpolate the surface, which would allow creating models comparable with those obtained using the topographic surface method. The comparison of spatial interpolation methods available in the free software such as SAGA GIS, GRASS GIS, SEXTANTE and gvSIG was conducted. The results were compared to the source data and to the model obtained using the topographic surface method. The influence of the type and quality of data on the characteristics of generated models was analyzed. The results of chosen spatial analysis carried out on the basis of constructed models were also compared. In summary, suggestions and proposals of spatial interpolation methods that were the most suitable for the creation of digital terrain models were formulated.
引用
收藏
页码：959 / 966
页数：8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Interpolation of Low Resolution Digital Elevation Models: A Comparison
    Kalimuthu, Hemalatha
    Tan, Wooi Nee
    Lim, Sin Liang
    Fauzi, Mohammad Faizal Ahmad
    2016 8TH COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (CEEC), 2016, : 71 - 76
  • [22] A comparative study of terrain interpolation methods
    Ahmadzadeh, MR
    Duree, P
    Petrou, M
    REMOTE SENSING FOR EARTH SCIENCE, OCEAN, AND SEA ICE APPLICATIONS, 1999, 3868 : 356 - 365
  • [23] ACCURACY ASSESSMENT AND COMPARISON OF INTERPOLATION METHODS ON GEOID MODELS
    Radanovic, Marko
    Basic, Tomislav
    GEODETSKI VESTNIK, 2018, 62 (01) : 68 - 78
  • [24] Methodology for Comparing Maps of Spatial Error Distribution of Digital Terrain Models
    Kulesza, Lukasz
    2018 BALTIC GEODETIC CONGRESS (BGC-GEOMATICS 2018), 2018, : 260 - 264
  • [25] Interpolation of digital elevation models using AMLE and related methods
    Almansa, A
    Cao, F
    Gousseau, Y
    Rougé, B
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2002, 40 (02): : 314 - 325
  • [26] Analysis of elevation interpolation methods for creating digital elevation models
    Pavlova A.I.
    Optoelectronics, Instrumentation and Data Processing, 2017, 53 (2) : 171 - 177
  • [27] Efficient representation of digital terrain models: compression and spatial decorrelation techniques
    Bjorke, JT
    Nilsen, S
    COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2002, 28 (04) : 433 - 445
  • [28] SPATIAL RESOLUTION EFFECTS OF DIGITAL TERRAIN MODELS ON LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY ANALYSIS
    Chang, K. T.
    Dou, J.
    Chang, Y.
    Kuo, C. P.
    Xu, K. M.
    Liu, J. K.
    XXIII ISPRS CONGRESS, COMMISSION VIII, 2016, 41 (B8): : 33 - 36
  • [29] Classification of digital terrain models through fuzzy clustering: An application
    Antoniol, G
    Ceccarelli, M
    Maratea, A
    Russo, F
    FUZZY LOGIC AND APPLICATIONS, 2006, 2955 : 174 - 182
  • [30] Comparison of interpolation models for estimating heavy metals in soils under various spatial characteristics and sampling methods
    Liao, Yilan
    Li, Dongyue
    Zhang, Ningxu
    TRANSACTIONS IN GIS, 2018, 22 (02) : 409 - 434
12345