STaT: A three-question screen for intimate partner violence

被引:50
|
作者
Paranjape, A
Liebschutz, J
机构
[1] Edith Nourse Rogers Mem Vet Adm Hosp, Ambulatory Serv, Boston, MA USA
[2] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[3] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Gen Internal Med Sect, Boston, MA 02118 USA
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1089/154099903321667573
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To develop a simple, sensitive screening tool for lifetime intimate partner violence (IPV) in women. Methods: In the emergency department (ED) of an urban teaching hospital, 75 English-speaking women between 18 and 64 years old were tested. The sensitivity and specificity of 43 dichotomous response-option, IPV screening questions were compared. The reference standard was lifetime IPV, determined by a semistructured interview, using preset criteria of specific violence acts or emotional control or both by an intimate partner. Questions with high sensitivity (>70%) were tested together against the reference standard. Answering yes to any question scored 1 point. Content area and the area under receiver-operator curve (AUROC) of the screening questions determined the final tool. Results: Sixty-three percent of women reported lifetime IPV. Eight of the 43 screening questions had a sensitivity of >70%. After testing possible combinations, the final three-question screen, STaT had the highest AUROC. The STaT questions are: "Have you ever been in a relationship where your partner has pushed or Slapped you?" "Have you ever been in a relationship where your partner Threatened you with violence?" and "Have you ever been in a relationship where your partner has thrown, broken or punched Things?" The sensitivity (95% confidence intervals [95% CI]) of STaT for lifetime IPV is 96% (90%, 100%), 89% (81%, 98%), and 64% (50%, 78%) for a score of greater than or equal to1, greater than or equal to2, and 3, respectively. The corresponding specificity is 75% (59%-91%), 100%, and 100%. Conclusions: Three simple questions when used together can effectively identify lifetime IPV and will aid clinicians' efforts to identify abuse in women.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 239
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Health Care Providers' Readiness to Screen for Intimate Partner Violence in Northern Nigeria
    John, I. A.
    Lawoko, Stephen
    Svanstrom, L.
    Mohammed, A. Z.
    [J]. VIOLENCE AND VICTIMS, 2010, 25 (05) : 689 - 704
  • [42] Validity of the Brief Inpatient Screen for Intimate Partner Violence Among Adult Women
    Laurie, Anna R.
    Showalter, John
    Pratt, Toya
    Ballentine, Noel H.
    Chinchilli, Vernon M.
    McCall-Hosenfeld, Jennifer S.
    [J]. WOMEN & HEALTH, 2012, 52 (07) : 679 - 699
  • [43] Temperature and intimate partner violence
    Nguyen, My
    [J]. SCOTTISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2024, 71 (02) : 197 - 218
  • [44] Intimate Partner Violence Screening
    不详
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 107 (02) : 199 - 199
  • [45] Neighborhood and Intimate Partner Violence
    Camargo, Esperanza
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE REVIEW, 2012, 22 (01) : 91 - 93
  • [46] The Prevention of Intimate Partner Violence
    Don G. Dutton
    [J]. Prevention Science, 2012, 13 : 395 - 397
  • [47] The roots of intimate partner violence
    Chester, David S.
    DeWall, C. Nathan
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 19 : 55 - 59
  • [48] Perinatal Intimate Partner Violence
    Hahn, Christine K.
    Gilmore, Amanda K.
    Aguayo, Rosaura Orengo
    Rheingold, Alyssa A.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2018, 45 (03) : 535 - +
  • [49] Coparenting and intimate partner violence
    Hardesty, Jennifer L.
    Ogolsky, Brian G.
    Akinbode, Tanitoluwa D.
    [J]. FAMILY COURT REVIEW, 2024, 62 (01) : 131 - 145
  • [50] Intimate Partner Violence in the Adolescent
    Rome, Ellen S.
    Miller, Elizabeth
    [J]. PEDIATRICS IN REVIEW, 2020, 41 (02) : 73 - 80