A comprehensive uncertainty evaluation of double-sensor conductivity probe

被引:4
|
作者
Wang, Dewei [1 ]
Fu, Yucheng [1 ]
Liu, Yang [1 ]
Talley, Justin D. [2 ]
Worosz, Ted [2 ]
Hogan, Kevin [2 ]
Buchanan, John R., Jr. [2 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Tech, Dept Mech Engn, Nucl Engn Program, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[2] Naval Nucl Lab, West Mifflin, PA 15122 USA
关键词
Two-phase flow; Double-sensor conductivity probe; Bubbles; Measurement uncertainty; INTERFACIAL AREA CONCENTRATION; NUMERICAL EVALUATION; 2-PHASE; BENCHMARKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.pnucene.2021.103741
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
The double-sensor conductivity probe is one widely used technique for measuring local time-averaged parameters in two-phase flows. Although a number of studies have been carried out in the past, a good understanding of the uncertainty of this technique is still lacking. This paper aims to address this gap by performing a systematic and comprehensive study on the measurement uncertainty of the probe. Three types of uncertainties are analyzed: that of measurands, of the model input parameters, and of the mathematical models. A Monte Carlo uncertainty evaluation framework simulating the measuring process is developed to link various uncertainty sources to the time-averaged two-phase flow quantities output by the probe. Various sensitivity studies on model uncertainties, model input uncertainties and their propagations are performed. The uncertainties in primitive time measurement are studied by specially designed tests. Results show that there are random errors and systematic delays in the interfacial time measured by the probe. These errors are correlated by bubble velocity, DAQ frequency and signal processing threshold. The analysis shows that a large uncertainty could exist in the velocity measurement for high-velocity-low-frequency conditions. The errors in primitive length measurements are quantified by both experiments and analysis. It shows that the flow-induced deflection and vibration are unnoticeable in the test section for a superficial liquid velocity up to 4 m/s. Another test is performed using a high speed camera to study the flow disturbance caused by a double-sensor probe. Test results show that the probe has minimal disturbance to the upstream region of the measuring location, though bubbles have been diverted by the probe downstream.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Probe into Comprehensive Evaluation Methods of China's Social Security
    Liu Weidong
    COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION OF ECONOMY AND SOCIETY WITH STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2010, : 379 - 384
  • [42] Giant Magnetoimpedance Current Sensor With Spiral Structure Double-Probe
    Han, Bing
    Zhang, Tao
    Huang, Dongyan
    Yue, Xinglong
    Zhou, Yu
    Bi, Mingshu
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2009, 45 (04) : 1999 - 2002
  • [43] Measurement and uncertainty evaluation of the microsphere used for micro-CMM probe
    Fang, Chuanzhi
    Huang, Qiangxian
    Ding, Xuemeng
    Cheng, Rongjun
    Zhang, Liansheng
    Wang, Chaoqun
    Mei, Jian
    Li, Hongli
    MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 31 (02)
  • [44] Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty Obtained With a Tool Probe on a CNC Machine Tool
    Salamacha, Daria
    Jozwik, Jerzy
    MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 23 (04): : 513 - 524
  • [45] Uncertainty Evaluation and calibrationof Electric Field Probe under GTEM cell
    Qin Jinfei
    Zhu Qi
    Zhou Wei
    Xue Li
    Feng Xiaodong
    2019 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTS & INTELLIGENT SYSTEM (ICRIS 2019), 2019, : 474 - 478
  • [46] Calibration and Uncertainty Evaluation of a 3-Axis Probe for EMC Testing
    Sittakul, V.
    Pasakawee, S.
    Karanun, K.
    2015 ASIA-PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY (APEMC), 2015, : 388 - 390
  • [47] Uncertainty Evaluation Method of Electric Field Probe Based on Bayesian Principle
    Qin Jinfei
    Zhu Qi
    Zhou Wei
    Xue Li
    Cai Bingbing
    2019 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTS & INTELLIGENT SYSTEM (ICRIS 2019), 2019, : 479 - 484
  • [48] Coupling a stochastic model with optimization technique for the evaluation of hydraulic conductivity uncertainty
    Mylopoulos, N. A.
    Sidiropoulos, P. G.
    GROUNDWATER MODELING AND MANAGEMENT UNDER UNCERTAINTY, 2012, : 51 - 57
  • [49] Assessment of Unsteady Pressure Measurement Uncertainty-Part I: Single Sensor Probe
    Dell'Era, Giulia
    Mersinligil, Mehmet
    Brouckaert, Jean-Francois
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2016, 138 (04):
  • [50] Evaluation of Humidity Sensor Calibration Uncertainty by Monte Carlo Method
    Wei, M.
    Wen, C.
    Li, C.
    Miao, J.
    MAPAN-JOURNAL OF METROLOGY SOCIETY OF INDIA, 2024, 39 (03): : 625 - 635