Patient participation as dialogue: setting research agendas

被引:153
|
作者
Abma, Tineke A. [1 ]
Broerse, Jacqueline E. W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, EMGO Inst, Dept Med Humanities, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Sci Commun Athena Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
dialogue; interactive approaches; methodology; participation; research agenda setting; responsive evaluation;
D O I
10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00549.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Collaboration with patients in healthcare and medical research is an emerging development. We aimed to develop a methodology for health research agenda setting processes grounded in the notion of participation as dialogue. Methods We conducted seven case studies between 2003 and 2007 to develop and validate a Dialogue Model for patient participation in health research agenda setting. The case studies related to spinal cord injury, neuromuscular diseases, renal failure, asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, burns, diabetes and intellectual disabilities. Results The Dialogue Model is grounded in participatory and interactive approaches and has been adjusted on the basis of pilot work. It has six phases: exploration; consultation; prioritization; integration; programming; and implementation. These phases are discussed and illustrated with a case description of research agenda setting relating to burns. Conclusions The dialogue model appeared relevant and feasible to structure the process of collaboration between stakeholders in several research agenda setting processes. The phase of consultation enables patients to develop their own voice and agenda, and prepares them for the broader collaboration with other stakeholder groups. Challenges include the stimulation of more permanent changes in research, and institutional transitions.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 173
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An instrument to measure individuals' research agenda setting: the multi-dimensional research agendas inventory
    Horta, Hugo
    Santos, Joao M.
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2016, 108 (03) : 1243 - 1265
  • [22] An instrument to measure individuals’ research agenda setting: the multi-dimensional research agendas inventory
    Hugo Horta
    João M. Santos
    Scientometrics, 2016, 108 : 1243 - 1265
  • [23] Identification of research priorities in CHD: empowering patients and families through participation in the development of formal research agendas
    Burns, Joseph
    Basken, Amy
    Acosta, Rebeka
    Garnier-Villarreal, Mauricio
    Kulkarni, Aparna
    Hayes, Denise A.
    CARDIOLOGY IN THE YOUNG, 2023, 33 (02) : 288 - 293
  • [24] MEDIA AGENDAS AND POLITICAL-PARTICIPATION
    TARDY, CH
    GAUGHAN, BJ
    HEMPHILL, MR
    CROCKETT, N
    JOURNALISM QUARTERLY, 1981, 58 (04): : 624 - 627
  • [25] Editorial: setting agendas and having an impact
    Bradshaw, M
    AREA, 2002, 34 (02) : 115 - 116
  • [26] Setting new(s) agendas - An introduction
    Carter, C
    Branston, G
    Allan, S
    NEWS, GENDER AND POWER, 1998, : 1 - 9
  • [27] Patient Acceptability of Participation in Obstetric Research
    Sherrell, H.
    Kumar, S.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 57 : 7 - 7
  • [28] Setting Our Research Agendas: Institutional Ecology, Informing Sciences, or Management Fashion Theory?
    Myers, Michael David
    Baskerville, Richard L.
    Gill, Grandon
    Ramiller, Neil
    COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2011, 28 : 357 - 372
  • [29] Agendas and Disability Research
    van Kraayenoord, Christa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISABILITY DEVELOPMENT AND EDUCATION, 2010, 57 (04) : 347 - 349
  • [30] Remodelling research agendas
    Tozama Qwebani-Ogunleye
    Pradeep Kumar
    Adeyemi Oladapo Aremu
    Nature Reviews Chemistry, 2022, 6 : 371 - 372