Autofluorescence imaging endoscopy can distinguish non-erosive reflux disease from functional heartburn: A pilot study

被引:6
|
作者
Luo, Xi [1 ]
Guo, Xiao-Xu [1 ]
Wang, Wei-Feng [1 ]
Peng, Li-Hua [1 ]
Yang, Yun-Sheng [1 ]
Uedo, Noriya [2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, 28 Fuxing Rd, Beijing 100853, Peoples R China
[2] Osaka Med Ctr Canc & Cardiovasc Dis, Dept Gastrointestinal Oncol, Osaka 5378511, Japan
关键词
Gastroesophageal reflux disease; White light imaging; Non-erosive reflux disease; Functional heartburn; Autofluorescence imaging; Ambulatory 24-h pH/impedance monitoring; Endoscopy; Esophagitis; HIGH-RESOLUTION ENDOSCOPY; ULCERATIVE-COLITIS; BARRETTS-ESOPHAGUS; COLORECTAL NEOPLASIA; SYSTEM; DIAGNOSIS; IMPEDANCE; CLASSIFICATION; GERD; NERD;
D O I
10.3748/wjg.v22.i14.3845
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
AIM: To investigate whether autofluorescence imaging (AFI) endoscopy can distinguish non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) from functional heartburn (FH). METHODS: In this prospective observational trial, 127 patients presenting with typical reflux symptoms for > 6 mo were screened. All the participants underwent endoscopy, during which white light imaging (WLI) was followed by AFI. Finally 84 patients with normal esophageal appearance on WLI were enrolled. It was defined as being suggestive of NERD if one or more longitudinal purple lines longer than one centimeter were visualized in the distal part of the esophagus during AFI endoscopy. Ambulatory 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring was also performed. After standard proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) tests, subjects were divided into an NERD group and an FH group and the diagnostic performance of AFI endoscopy to differentiate NERD from FH was evaluated. RESULTS: Of 84 endoscopy-negative patients, 36 42.9%) had a normal pH/impedance test. Of these, 26 patients with favorable responses to PPI tests were classified as having NERD. Finally 10 patients were diagnosed with FH and the others with NERD. Altogether, 68 (81.0%) of the 84 patients were positive on AFI endoscopy. In the NERD group, there were 67 (90.5%) patients with abnormal esophageal findings on AFI endoscopy while only 1 (10%) patient was positive on AFI endoscopy in the FH group. The sensitivity and specificity of AFI in differentiating NERD from FH were 90.5% (95% CI: 81.5%-96.1%) and 90.0% (95% CI: 55.5%-99.7%), respectively. Meanwhile, the accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of AFI in differentiating between NERD and FH were 90.5% (95% CI: 84.2%-96.8%), 98.5% (95% CI: 92.1%-99.9%) and 56.3% (95% CI: 30.0%-80.2%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Autofluorescence imaging may serve as a complementary method in evaluating patients with NERD and FH.
引用
收藏
页码:3845 / 3851
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A cost analysis of the diagnostic workup of heartburn symptoms in patients with erosive and non-erosive reflux disease
    Lee, Robert
    Weissman, Jeffrey
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 103 : S390 - S391
  • [32] Vonoprazan is Efficacious for Treatment of Heartburn in Non-erosive Reflux Disease: A Randomized Trial
    Laine, Loren
    Spechler, Stuart
    Yadlapati, Rena
    Schnoll-Sussman, Felice
    Smith, Neila
    Leifke, Eckhard
    Harris, Tom
    Hunt, Barbara
    Fass, Ronnie
    Katz, Philip
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2024, 22 (11)
  • [33] Effect of Amiloride on Acid-Induced Heartburn in Non-Erosive Reflux Disease
    Bulsiewicz, William J.
    Shaheen, Nicholas J.
    Hansen, Mark Berner
    Pruitt, Amy P.
    Orlando, Roy C.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 142 (05) : S753 - S753
  • [34] DISTAL AND PROXIMAL ESOPHAGEAL IMPEDANCE BASAL VALUES IN PATIENTS WITH NON-EROSIVE REFLUX DISEASE AND FUNCTIONAL HEARTBURN
    Martinucci, I.
    De Bortoli, N.
    Savarino, E.
    Franchi, R.
    Bertani, L.
    Urbano, M. T.
    Russo, S.
    Furnari, M.
    Bellini, M.
    Savarino, V.
    Marchi, S.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2014, 46 : S93 - S93
  • [35] Distal and Proximal Esophageal Impedance Basal Values in Patients With Non-Erosive Reflux Disease and Functional Heartburn
    de Bortoli, Nicola
    Martinucci, Irene
    Savarino, Edoardo
    Tutuian, Radu
    Franchi, Riccardo
    Bertani, Lorenzo
    Russo, Salvatore
    Furnari, Manuele
    Bellini, Massimo
    Savarino, Vincenzo
    Marchi, Santino
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 146 (05) : S749 - S749
  • [36] The pathohistological features before and after treatment by rabeprazole in patients with non-erosive reflux disease and functional heartburn
    Li, W.
    Zhang, S. T.
    Yu, Z. L.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2008, 23 : A90 - A90
  • [37] Development and evaluation of a modified Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease to distinguish functional dyspepsia from non-erosive reflux disease
    Kusano, Motoyasu
    Hosaka, Hiroko
    Kawada, Akiyo
    Kuribayashi, Shikou
    Shimoyama, Yasuyuki
    Kawamura, Osamu
    Moki, Fumitaka
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2012, 27 (07) : 1187 - 1191
  • [38] Newly Developed Bioelectrical Admittance Measurement Distinguishes Patients With Non-Erosive Reflux Disease From Those With Functional Heartburn
    Manabe, Noriaki
    Kamada, Tomoari
    Kusunoki, Hiroaki
    Shiotani, Akiko
    Inoue, Kazuhiko
    Hata, Jiro
    Haruma, Ken
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 146 (05) : S116 - S116
  • [39] Different patterns of oesophageal acid exposure distinguish complicated reflux disease from either erosive reflux oesophagitis or non-erosive reflux disease
    Frazzoni, M
    De Micheli, E
    Savarino, V
    ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2003, 18 (11-12) : 1091 - 1098
  • [40] PREVALENCE OF ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY ABNORMALITIES IN PATIENTS WITH "TRLE" NON-EROSIVE REFLUX DISEASE, EROSIVE ESOPHAGITIS, BARRETT ESOPHAGUS AND FUNCTIONAL HEARTBURN
    Gemignani, L.
    Savarino, E.
    Marabotto, E.
    Sammito, G.
    Zentilin, P.
    Savarino, V.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2010, 42 : S107 - S107