Comparison of Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction (ddPCR) and Real-Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) in Detecting Neonatal Invasive Fungal Infections

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Huitao [1 ]
Chen, Xueyu [1 ]
Qiu, Xiaomei [1 ]
Huang, Weimin [2 ]
Yang, Chuanzhong [1 ]
机构
[1] Southern Med Univ, Affiliated Shenzhen Matern & Child Healthcare Hos, Dept Neonatol, Shenzhen 518028, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Southern Med Univ, Nanfang Hosp, Dept Neonatol, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction; Real-Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction; Invasive Fungal Infection; 18S rRNA; BLOOD; DNA; QUANTIFICATION; IMPLEMENTATION; EXTRACTION; DESIGN; PCR;
D O I
10.1166/jbt.2021.2408
中图分类号
Q813 [细胞工程];
学科分类号
摘要
Invasive fungal infection (IFI) is the leading cause of death in neonatal patients, yet the diagnosis of IFI remains a major challenge. At present, most IFI laboratory diagnostic methods are based on classical, but limited, methods such as fungal isolation and culture and histopathological examination. Recently, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) technology have been adopted to quantify nucleic-acid identification. In this study, we established qPCR and ddPCR assays for IFI diagnosis and quantification. qPCR and ddPCR were carried out using identical primers and probe for the amplification of 18S rRNA. Assay results for three fungal strains were positive, whereas ten non-fungal strains had negative results, indicating 100% specificity for both ddPCR and qPCR methods. Genomic DNA of Candida albicans was tested after a serial dilution to compare the sensitivity of the two PCR methods. The limit of detection of ddPCR was 3.2 copies/L, which was a ten-fold increase compared with that of the qPCR method (32 copies/L). Blood samples from 127 patients with high-risk factors and clinical symptoms for IFI were collected from a NICU in Shenzhen, China, and analyzed using qPCR and ddPCR. Thirty-four blood samples from neonates had a proven or probable diagnosis of IFI, and 25 of these were positive by qPCR, whereas 30 were positive by ddPCR. Among the 93 blood samples from neonates who had a possible IFI or no IFI, 24 were positive using qPCR, and 7 were positive using ddPCR. In conclusion, ddPCR is a rapid and accurate pan-fungal detection method and provides a promising prospect for IFI clinical screening.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 379
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of a conventional polymerase chain reaction with real-time polymerase chain reaction for the detection of neurotropic viruses in cerebrospinal fluid samples
    Ramamurthy, M.
    Alexander, M.
    Aaron, S.
    Kannangai, R.
    Ravi, V.
    Sridharan, G.
    Abraham, A. M.
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2011, 29 (02) : 102 - 109
  • [32] Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and droplet digital PCR duplex assays for detecting Zostera marina DNA in coastal sediments
    Hamaguchi, Masami
    Shimabukuro, Hiromori
    Hori, Masakazu
    Yoshida, Goro
    Terada, Tomoko
    Miyajima, Toshihiro
    [J]. LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY-METHODS, 2018, 16 (04): : 253 - 264
  • [33] Detection of invasive fungal infections with broad range panfungal primers and molecular beacons in a real time quantitative polymerase chain reaction
    Mugunthan, M.
    Kumar, M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2016, 45 : 315 - 316
  • [34] A Pilot Comparison of Fixatives for Hookworm Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction
    Bradbury, Richard
    Inagaki, Kengo
    Singh, Gurbaksh
    Agana, Urita
    Patterson, Kayla
    Malloch, Lacy
    Rodriguez, Eduardo
    Qvarnstrom, Yvonne
    Hobbs, Charlotte V.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2023, 108 (02): : 335 - 339
  • [35] Molecular beacons:: A real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for detecting Salmonella
    Chen, W
    Martinez, G
    Mulchandani, A
    [J]. ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2000, 280 (01) : 166 - 172
  • [36] Real-time polymerase chain reaction for detecting SARS coronavirus, Beijing, 2003
    Zhai, JH
    Briese, T
    Dai, E
    Wang, XY
    Pang, X
    Du, ZM
    Liu, HH
    Wang, J
    Wang, HX
    Guo, ZB
    Chen, ZL
    Jiang, LX
    Zhou, DS
    Han, YP
    Jabado, O
    Palacios, G
    Lipkin, WI
    Yang, RF
    [J]. EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 10 (02) : 300 - 303
  • [37] Minimization of Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction System
    Hwang, Ji Soo
    Kim, Yeo-Reum
    Park, Chan Young
    Song, Hye Jeong
    Kim, Yu Seop
    Kim, Jong Dae
    [J]. BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2019, 124 : 7 - 7
  • [38] Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction A Revolution in Diagnostics
    Pabla, Simarjot Singh
    Pahla, Sarabjot Singh
    [J]. RESONANCE-JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2008, 13 (04): : 369 - 377
  • [39] Rickettsia prowazekii and real-time polymerase chain reaction
    Svraka, S
    Rolain, JM
    Bechah, Y
    Gatabazi, J
    Raoult, D
    [J]. EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2006, 12 (03) : 428 - 432
  • [40] Comparison of real-time polymerase chain reaction and end-point polymerase chain reaction for the analysis of gene expression in preimplantation embryos
    Gál, AB
    Carnwath, JW
    Dinnyes, A
    Herrmann, D
    Niemann, H
    Wrenzycki, C
    [J]. REPRODUCTION FERTILITY AND DEVELOPMENT, 2006, 18 (03) : 365 - 371