Sleep Disturbance and Ovarian Stimulation Outcomes in Infertility and Fertility Preservation Patients

被引:0
|
作者
Lyttle, Brianna M. W.
Lawson, Angela K.
Klock, Susan
Smith, Kristin
Kazer, Ralph
Hirshfeld-Cytron, Jennifer
Pavone, Mary Ellen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Sch Med, Dept Obstet, Worcester, MA USA
关键词
assisted reproduction techniques; controlled ovarian hyperstimulation; infertility; insufficient sleep syndrome; ovarian stimulation; ovulation induction; sleep disorders; sleep disturbance; sleep fragmentation; BREAST-CANCER; PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACT; DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS; HEART-FAILURE; PREDICTORS; DURATION; INSOMNIA; QUALITY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To assess sleep patterns and ovarian stimulation outcomes in infertile as compared to fertility preservation (FP) patients with a concurrent cancer diagnosis undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective survey study done at a single academic medical center examining sleep disturbance, medical diagnoses, anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH), and COH stimulation results using CES-D scale in 50 infertile and 32 age-matched FP patients. RESULTS: Sleep disturbance was significantly higher at baseline in FP patients. Over time, sleep disturbance significantly increased in infertile patients (T1 MOS-SS SCORE= 16; T2 MOS-SS SCORE= 20) but not in FP patients (T1 MOS-SS SCORE= 32; T2 MOS-SS SCORE= 36). Sleep disturbance did correlate with CES-D scores for both infertile and FP patients. How-ever, no correlations were found between sleep disturbance and AMH, peak estradiol, total medication received, number of oocytes retrieved, and number of oocytes frozen. CONCLUSION: Sleep scores for infertile patients significantly increased, often reaching values equivalent to national levels cited for chronic illnesses. For both infertile and FP patients, sleep scores correlated with CES-D scores but did not correlate with ovarian stimulation outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:292 / 298
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Patients undergoing elective and onco-fertility preservation respond similarly to controlled ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation
    Kira, A.
    Hentschke, M.
    Vasconcelos, N. Fontour D.
    Deven Trindade, V.
    Colombo, T.
    Petracco, A.
    Costa, B. E. Pinheir. D.
    Badalotti, M.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2021, 36 : 347 - 347
  • [12] Ovarian stimulation and PGT-A outcomes with random start letrozole protocol for fertility preservation in breast cancer patients
    Arkfeld, C.
    Gayete-Lafuente, S.
    Turan, V.
    Oktay, K.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2022, 37 : I417 - I417
  • [13] Patients undergoing elective and oncofertility preservation respond similarly to controlled ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation
    Frare Kira, Ariane Tieko
    Hentschke, Marta Ribeiro
    de Vasconcelos, Natalia Fontoura
    Colombo, Talita
    Trindade, Vanessa Devens
    Petracco, Alvaro
    Pinheiro da Costa, Bartira Ercilia
    Badalotti, Mariangela
    JORNAL BRASILEIRO DE REPRODUCAO ASSISTIDA, 2022, 26 (03): : 407 - 411
  • [14] Fertility preservation in patients with borderline ovarian tumors: safety and reproductive outcomes
    Shai, D.
    Rossella, M.
    Cioffi, R.
    Ohayon, A.
    Helpman, L.
    Papaleo, E.
    Vanni, V. S.
    Bergamini, A.
    Candiani, M.
    Korach, J.
    Mangili, G.
    Meirow, D.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2024, 39
  • [15] Ovarian cryopreservation for fertility preservation: indications and outcomes
    Anderson, R. A.
    Wallace, W. H. B.
    Baird, D. T.
    REPRODUCTION, 2008, 136 (06) : 681 - 689
  • [16] Ovarian stimulation response and fertility outcomes in patients with breast cancer across different stages, grades, and hormone receptor status for fertility preservation
    Liu, Shang-Min
    Huang, Shang-Yu
    Wu, Hsien-Ming
    Chang, Chia-Lin
    Huang, Hong-Yuan
    JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2025, 124 (03) : 241 - 245
  • [17] Ovarian stimulation for emergency fertility preservation in cancer patients: A case series study
    Rashidi, Batool Hossein
    Tehrani, Ensiyeh Shahrokh
    Ghaffari, Firouzeh
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2014, 10 : 19 - 21
  • [18] Double ovarian stimulation (DuoStim) protocol for fertility preservation in female oncology patients
    Tsampras, Nikolaos
    Gould, Della
    Fitzgerald, Cheryl T.
    HUMAN FERTILITY, 2017, 20 (04) : 248 - 253
  • [19] Comparison of conventional and random start ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation in oncological patients
    Jancar, N.
    Bokal, E. Vrtacnik
    Klun, I. Virant
    Stimpfel, M.
    Kermavner, L. Bacer
    Salamun, V.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2018, 33 : 372 - 373
  • [20] Ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation in women diagnosed with cancer
    Kim, S. Samuel
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2018, 110 (07) : 1269 - 1270