Experiments on prosody perception with cochlear implants

被引:0
|
作者
Meister, H.
Tepeli, D.
Wagner, P.
Hess, W.
Walger, M.
von Wedel, H.
Lang-Roth, R.
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Jean Uhrmacher Inst, Klin HNO Forsch, D-50931 Cologne, Germany
[2] Univ Bonn, Inst Kommunikat Forsch & Phonet, D-5300 Bonn, Germany
[3] Klinikum Univ Cologne, Klin & Poliklin Hals Nasen Ohrenheilkunde Kopf, Cologne, Germany
关键词
prosody; cochlear implants; temporal processing; pitch frequency; communication;
D O I
10.1007/s00106-006-1452-1
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background and objective. Prosody has a myriad of linguistic functions and involves specific aspects of speech, such as stress, intonation and pauses. The underlying acoustic quantities (amplitude envelope, pitch frequency, and temporal structure) can be processed and transmitted by cochlear implants (CI) only to a limited extent. At present, no adequate tests are available in the German-speaking world for evaluation of the perception of prosodic elements. Different experiments have been conducted to address several prosodic cues, and the results are to be used as a basis for appropriate tests. Methods. Various prosodic materials were used for the experiments. Discrimination was measured for minimal pairs differing in frequency and/or duration, accents in words and phrases, questions versus statements and phrasing. Measurements were performed in ten normal-hearing subjects and five with cochlear implants. Results and conclusions. In all test modules, the subjects with normal hearing proved to have high discrimination rates of 96-100%. The test of word stresses was problematic because the results were influenced by different confounders. The other measurements did prove to be basically suitable for use in the subjects with implants. Early results revealed that the subjects with CI had few problems with prosodic cues based on the temporal structure, the outcome being similar to that of the subjects with normal hearing in these tests. In contrast, the performance of subjects with CI in perceiving prosodic cues based on amplitude variations and, especially, on alterations in pitch frequency was worse, even though some of them achieved very good results in these tests too. These preliminary tests can form the basis for development of a German-language prosody test battery with a limited number of subtests addressing different prosodic cues .
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 270
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prosody perception and production by children with cochlear implants
    Van De Velde, Daan J.
    Schiller, Niels O.
    Levelt, Claartje C.
    Van Heuven, Vincent J.
    Beers, Mieke
    Briaire, Jeroen J.
    Frijns, Johan H. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHILD LANGUAGE, 2019, 46 (01) : 111 - 141
  • [2] Effect of cochlear implants on children's perception and production of speech prosody
    Nakata, Takayuki
    Trehub, Sandra E.
    Kanda, Yukihiko
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2012, 131 (02): : 1307 - 1314
  • [3] Prosody perception and musical pitch discrimination in adults using cochlear implants
    Kalathottukaren, Rose Thomas
    Purdy, Suzanne C.
    Ballard, Elaine
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2015, 54 (07) : 444 - 452
  • [4] Emotional prosody perception and production are linked in prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants
    Chatterjee, Monita
    Feller, Ava
    Kulkarni, Aditya M.
    Galvin, John J.
    [J]. JASA EXPRESS LETTERS, 2023, 3 (12):
  • [5] Experimente zur Perzeption prosodischer Merkmale mit KochleaimplantatenExperiments on prosody perception with cochlear implants
    H. Meister
    D. Tepeli
    P. Wagner
    W. Hess
    M. Walger
    H. von Wedel
    R. Lang-Roth
    [J]. HNO, 2007, 55 (4) : 264 - 270
  • [6] Benefits of Music Training for Perception of Emotional Speech Prosody in Deaf Children With Cochlear Implants
    Good, Arla
    Gordon, Karen A.
    Papsin, Blake C.
    Nespoli, Gabe
    Hopyan, Talar
    Peretz, Isabelle
    Russo, Frank A.
    [J]. EAR AND HEARING, 2017, 38 (04): : 455 - 464
  • [7] Prosody and voice characteristics of children with cochlear implants
    Lenden, Jessica M.
    Flipsen, Peter, Jr.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2007, 40 (01) : 66 - 81
  • [8] Studies of prosody perception by cochlear implant patients
    Richardson, LM
    Busby, PA
    Blamey, PJ
    Clark, GM
    [J]. AUDIOLOGY, 1998, 37 (04): : 231 - 245
  • [9] Speech intelligibility and prosody production in children with cochlear implants
    Chin, Steven B.
    Bergeson, Tonya R.
    Jennifer Phan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2012, 45 (05) : 355 - 366
  • [10] Examination of Prosody and Timbre Perception in Adults With Cochlear Implants Comparing Different Fine Structure Coding Strategies
    Mueller, Verena
    Kluenter, Heinz
    Fuerstenberg, Dirk
    Meister, Hartmut
    Walger, Martin
    Lang-Roth, Ruth
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2018, 27 (02) : 197 - 207