Fit-testing of respiratory protective equipment in the UK during the initial response to the COVID-19 pandemic

被引:12
|
作者
Green, S. [1 ]
Gani, A. [2 ]
Bailey, M. [3 ]
Brown, O. [2 ]
Hing, C. B. [2 ]
机构
[1] St Georges Univ, London, England
[2] St Georges Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Hosp, Dept Trauma & Orthopaed, Blackshaw Rd, London SW17 0QT, England
[3] Hampshire Hosp NHS Fdn Hosp, Dept Trauma & Orthopaed, Basingstoke, Hants, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
COVID-19; Fit-testing; Freedom of Information Act; FFP3; BAME;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhin.2021.04.024
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Public Health England guidance stipulates the use of filtering facepiece (FFP3) masks for healthcare workers engaged in aerosol-generating procedures. Mask fit testing of respiratory protective equipment is essential to protect healthcare workers from aerosolized particles. Aim: To analyse the outcome of mask fit-testing across National Health Service (NHS) hospitals in the UK during the first wave of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods: Using the Freedom of Information Act, 137 NHS hospitals were approached on May 26th, 2020 by an independent researcher to provide data on the outcome of fit-testing at each site. Findings: Ninety-six hospitals responded to the request between May 26th, 2020 to October 29th, 2020. There was a total of 86 mask types used across 56 hospitals, 13 of which were used in at least 10% of these hospitals; the most frequently used was the FFP3M1863, used by 92.86% of hospitals. Overall fit-testing pass rates were provided by 32 hospitals with mean pass rate of 80.74%. The most successful masks, in terms of fit-test failure rates, were the Alpha Solway 3030V and the Alpha Solway S-3V (both reporting mean fit-test failures of 2%). Male-and female-specific pass and failure rates were provided by seven hospitals. Across the seven hospitals, 20.1% of men tested failed the fit-test for all masks used, whereas 19.9% of women tested failed the fit-test for all masks used. Failure rates were significantly higher in staff from Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic (BAME) backgrounds 644/2507 (25.69%) across four hospitals. Conclusion: Twenty percent of healthcare workers tested during the first response to the pandemic failed fit-testing for masks. A small sample revealed that this was most prominent in staff from BAME backgrounds. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Healthcare Infection Society.
引用
收藏
页码:180 / 186
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Isolation Requirements and Personal Protective Equipment in the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Rabold, Erica
    Rovnan, Helene
    DuMont, Tiffany
    CRITICAL CARE NURSING QUARTERLY, 2020, 43 (04) : 407 - 412
  • [32] Brief Cost Analysis of Surgical Personal Protective Equipment During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Kapinos, Kandice A.
    Salley, Jordan R.
    Day, Andrew
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (08) : 1317 - 1320
  • [33] In reply: Personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic (Letters #1 and #2)
    Duggan, Laura V.
    Lockhart, Shannon L.
    Grocott, Hilary P.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2020, 67 (11): : 1651 - 1652
  • [34] Personal protective equipment needs during the COVID-19 pandemic: A survey of medical dermatologists
    Chand, S.
    Rrapi, R.
    Gabel, C.
    Levin, Y.
    Neel, V.
    Kroshinsky, D.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2021, 141 (05) : S118 - S118
  • [35] Prevention of facial injuries caused by personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Salome, Geraldo Magela
    Alves Dutra, Rosimar Aparecida
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2021, 74
  • [36] Personal protective equipment: Suggested best practices for pharmacies during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Dattani, Shelita
    Mohr, Heather
    CANADIAN PHARMACISTS JOURNAL, 2020, 153 (06) : 327 - 334
  • [37] Knowledge and use of personal protective equipment by nursing professionals during the Covid-19 pandemic
    de Moura, Maria Sauanna Sany
    dos Santos e Silva, Renata Kelly
    Mendes, Priscila Martins
    Sousa, Antonia Sylca de Jesus
    Neto, Francisco Joao de Carvalho
    REVISTA DA ESCOLA DE ENFERMAGEM DA USP, 2021, 55 : 1 - 8
  • [38] Adherence to Personal Protective Equipment practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: A pilot study
    Amos, Taryn B.
    Griffin, Cameron
    Schaffzin, Joshua K.
    Ankrum, Andrea
    Huang, Felicia Scaggs
    INFECTION PREVENTION IN PRACTICE, 2024, 6 (02)
  • [39] In reply: Personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic (Letters #1 and #2)
    Laura V. Duggan
    Shannon L. Lockhart
    Hilary P. Grocott
    Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 2020, 67 : 1651 - 1652
  • [40] Personal protective equipment modification by health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Trepanowski, Nicole
    Meltzer, Rachel
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2022, 87 (03) : AB191 - AB191