Two-stage revision for infected shoulder arthroplasty

被引:49
|
作者
Buchalter, Daniel B. [1 ]
Mahure, Siddharth A. [1 ]
Mollon, Brent [1 ]
Yu, Stephen [1 ]
Kwon, Young W. [1 ]
Zuckerman, Joseph D. [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Hosp Joint Dis, Langone Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, New York, NY USA
关键词
Total shoulder arthroplasty; periprosthetic infection; two-stage revision; reimplantation; medical comorbidities; literature review; PERIPROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION; TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; PROPIONIBACTERIUM-ACNES; RISK-FACTORS; MANAGEMENT; PROSTHESIS; DEBRIDEMENT; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.056
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Periprosthetic shoulder infections (PSIs) are challenging to treat and often result in significant patient morbidity. Without a standardized treatment protocol, PSIs are often managed similarly to periprosthetic hip and knee infections. Because 2-stage revision is the gold standard for treating periprosthetic hip and knee infections, we performed a case series and literature review to determine its effectiveness in PSIs. Methods: We identified 19 patients (14 men) from our institution who were treated with a 2-stage revision after presenting with a PSI. Mean patient age was 63 +/- 9 years, and average body mass index was 30.8 +/- 5.8. The average time from the index arthroplasty to treatment was 40 months, 8 of 13 positive cultures were Propionibacterium acnes, and 9 of 19 patients had multiple shoulder operations before presenting with infection. Minimum follow-up for all patients was 2 years. Results: After a mean follow-up of 63 months (range, 25-184 months), 15 of 19 patients in our study were successfully treated for PSI. Average postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Assessment score was 69 (range, 32-98) and average postoperative forward elevation was significantly increased from 58 degrees to 119 degrees (P < .001). The incidence of recurrent infection was 26%. The rate of noninfection complications was 16%, for a total complication rate of 42%. Conclusion: In patients with PSIs, especially those with intractable, chronic infections, a 2-stage revision represents a viable treatment option for eradicating infection and restoring function. However, it is important to recognize the risk of recurrent infection and postoperative complications in this challenging patient population. (C) 2016 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:939 / 947
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patellar resurfacing versus no resurfacing in two-stage revision of infected total knee arthroplasty
    Joo, Jong-Hwan
    Lee, Su-Chan
    Ahn, Nong-Kyoum
    Ahn, Hye-Sun
    Jung, Kwang-Am
    KNEE, 2013, 20 (06): : 451 - 456
  • [22] FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME AND CURRENT PRACTICE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF TWO-STAGE REVISION FOR INFECTED KNEE ARTHROPLASTY
    Sobti, A.
    Jameel, A.
    Balagopal, A.
    Nath, S.
    Unnithan, A.
    Sharma, S.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 31 (SUPPL 1) : S485 - S485
  • [23] Shoulder and elbow arthroplasty: One-stage or two-stage
    Rozing, Piet M.
    Nagels, Jochern
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2008, 17 (01) : 9 - 13
  • [24] Functional interest of an articulating spacer in two-stage infected total knee arthroplasty revision
    Classen, T.
    von Knoch, M.
    Wernsmann, M.
    Landgraeber, S.
    Loeer, F.
    Jaeger, M.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2014, 100 (04) : 409 - 412
  • [25] One- and two-stage surgical revision of infected shoulder prostheses following arthroplasty surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kunutsor, Setor K.
    Wylde, Vikki
    Beswick, Andrew D.
    Whitehouse, Michael R.
    Blom, Ashley W.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [26] One- and two-stage surgical revision of infected shoulder prostheses following arthroplasty surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Setor K. Kunutsor
    Vikki Wylde
    Andrew D. Beswick
    Michael R. Whitehouse
    Ashley W. Blom
    Scientific Reports, 9
  • [27] Comparison of One-Stage Revision With Antibiotic Cement Versus Two-Stage Revision Results for Infected Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Choi, Ho-Rim
    Kwon, Young-Min
    Freiberg, Andrew A.
    Malchau, Henrik
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2013, 28 (08): : 66 - 70
  • [28] Interleukin-6 in two-stage revision arthroplasty
    Hoell, S.
    Borgers, L.
    Gosheger, G.
    Dieckmann, R.
    Schulz, D.
    Gerss, J.
    Hardes, J.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2015, 97B (01): : 71 - 75
  • [29] Two-stage uncemented revision hip arthroplasty for infection
    Haddad, FS
    Muirhead-Allwood, SK
    Manktelow, ARJ
    Bacarese-Hamilton, I
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2000, 82B (05): : 689 - 694
  • [30] Two-stage revision of an infected total hip arthroplasty: a follow-up of 136 patients
    van Diemen, Marcus P. J.
    Colen, Sascha
    Dalemans, Alain A. R.
    Stuyck, Jose
    Mulier, Michiel
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 23 (05) : 445 - 450