Two-stage revision for infected shoulder arthroplasty

被引:46
|
作者
Buchalter, Daniel B. [1 ]
Mahure, Siddharth A. [1 ]
Mollon, Brent [1 ]
Yu, Stephen [1 ]
Kwon, Young W. [1 ]
Zuckerman, Joseph D. [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Hosp Joint Dis, Langone Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, New York, NY USA
关键词
Total shoulder arthroplasty; periprosthetic infection; two-stage revision; reimplantation; medical comorbidities; literature review; PERIPROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION; TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; PROPIONIBACTERIUM-ACNES; RISK-FACTORS; MANAGEMENT; PROSTHESIS; DEBRIDEMENT; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.056
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Periprosthetic shoulder infections (PSIs) are challenging to treat and often result in significant patient morbidity. Without a standardized treatment protocol, PSIs are often managed similarly to periprosthetic hip and knee infections. Because 2-stage revision is the gold standard for treating periprosthetic hip and knee infections, we performed a case series and literature review to determine its effectiveness in PSIs. Methods: We identified 19 patients (14 men) from our institution who were treated with a 2-stage revision after presenting with a PSI. Mean patient age was 63 +/- 9 years, and average body mass index was 30.8 +/- 5.8. The average time from the index arthroplasty to treatment was 40 months, 8 of 13 positive cultures were Propionibacterium acnes, and 9 of 19 patients had multiple shoulder operations before presenting with infection. Minimum follow-up for all patients was 2 years. Results: After a mean follow-up of 63 months (range, 25-184 months), 15 of 19 patients in our study were successfully treated for PSI. Average postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Assessment score was 69 (range, 32-98) and average postoperative forward elevation was significantly increased from 58 degrees to 119 degrees (P < .001). The incidence of recurrent infection was 26%. The rate of noninfection complications was 16%, for a total complication rate of 42%. Conclusion: In patients with PSIs, especially those with intractable, chronic infections, a 2-stage revision represents a viable treatment option for eradicating infection and restoring function. However, it is important to recognize the risk of recurrent infection and postoperative complications in this challenging patient population. (C) 2016 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:939 / 947
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The management of infected elbow arthroplasty by two-stage revision
    Rudge, Will B. J.
    Eseonu, Kelechi
    Brown, Matthew
    Warren, Simon
    Majed, Addie
    Bayley, Ian L.
    Lambert, Simon M.
    Higgs, Deborah
    Falworth, Mark
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2018, 27 (05) : 879 - 886
  • [2] PROSTALAC Implantation for Two-Stage Eradication of Infected Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Friedman, Darren J.
    Parnes, Nata
    Dunn, John C.
    Higgins, Laurence D.
    Warner, Jon J. P.
    [J]. TECHNIQUES IN SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2008, 9 (03): : 114 - 125
  • [3] Spacer prostheses in two-stage revision of infected knee arthroplasty
    E. Jämsen
    P. Sheng
    P. Halonen
    M. U. K. Lehto
    T. Moilanen
    J. Pajamäki
    T. Puolakka
    Y. T. Konttinen
    [J]. International Orthopaedics, 2006, 30 : 257 - 261
  • [4] Spacer prostheses in two-stage revision of infected knee arthroplasty
    Jamsen, E.
    Sheng, P.
    Halonen, P.
    Lehto, M. U. K.
    Moilanen, T.
    Pajamaki, J.
    Puolakka, T.
    Konttinen, Y. T.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2006, 30 (04) : 257 - 261
  • [5] Two-stage revision for the treatment of the infected total elbow arthroplasty
    Peach, C. A.
    Nicoletti, S.
    Lawrence, T. M.
    Stanley, D.
    [J]. BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2013, 95B (12): : 1681 - 1686
  • [6] Advantages of Two-Stage Revision Arthroplasty
    Randelli, Filippo
    Aliprandi, Alberto
    Banci, Lorenzo
    Sconfienza, Luca
    Sardanelli, Francesco
    [J]. INFECTED IMPLANT, 2009, : 127 - +
  • [7] Outcomes of infected revision knee arthroplasty managed by two-stage revision in a tertiary referral centre
    Stammers, John
    Kahane, Steven
    Ranawat, Vijai
    Miles, Jonathan
    Pollock, Rob
    Carrington, Richard W. J.
    Briggs, Timothy
    Skinner, John A.
    [J]. KNEE, 2015, 22 (01): : 56 - 62
  • [8] Two-stage revision of infected total knee arthroplasty using a distraction spacer
    Citak, Mustafa
    Gessmann, Jan
    Fehmer, Tobias
    Russe, Otto
    Schildhauer, Thomas A.
    Seybold, Dominik
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2011, 19 (03) : 167 - 171
  • [9] The Impact of Patellar Resurfacing in Two-Stage Revision of the Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Glynn, Aaron
    Huang, Ronald
    Mortazavi, Javad
    Parvizi, Javad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2014, 29 (07): : 1439 - 1442
  • [10] Is there a role for extended antibiotic therapy in a two-stage revision of the infected knee arthroplasty?
    Hoad-Reddick, DA
    Evans, CR
    Norman, P
    Stockley, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2005, 87B (02): : 171 - 174