S-1 Maintenance Therapy After First-Line Treatment With Nab-Paclitaxel Plus S-1 for Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Real-World Study

被引:6
|
作者
Shi, Yan [1 ]
Han, Quanli [2 ]
Yan, Huan [2 ]
Lv, Yao [2 ]
Yuan, Jing [3 ]
Li, Jie [3 ]
Guan, Shasha [2 ]
Wang, Zhikuan [2 ]
Huang, Lei [1 ,4 ]
Dai, Guanghai [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Ruijin Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Oncol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army PLA Gen Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army PLA Gen Hosp, Dept Pathol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Med Ctr Aging, Ruijin Hosp, Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2022年 / 12卷
关键词
maintenance therapy; pancreatic adenocarcinoma; S-1; nab-paclitaxel; survival; safety; PHASE-II; CANCER; GEMCITABINE; CHEMOTHERAPY; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2022.865404
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundIn our previous phase II study, nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 (NPS) showed encouraging objective response rate (ORR) as first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (APAC). This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of S-1 maintenance after NPS in APAC and to explore factors predicting survival benefits when using S-1 maintenance. MethodsBetween 2014 and 2018 a total of 182 patients with APAC, who were primarily treated with NPS, were included. For patients without progression or with treatment discontinuation due to any reasons within 4 months during NPS treatment, S-1 monotherapy was administrable as maintenance therapy at the physicians' discretion based on the patients' preference and performance status. Efficacy and safety of S-1 maintenance were investigated. ResultsIn 123 patients without progression within 4 months during NPS treatment, 74 received S-1 maintenance and had median progression-free survival of 9.6 months and median overall survival of 16.7 months. Multivariable analysis showed that in patients receiving S-1 maintenance after first-line NPS therapy, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status score of 0, non-metastatic disease, and complete or partial response as best response to NPS chemotherapy were independently associated with better survival. The most common all-grade hematological and non-hematological adverse events were neutropenia (82.4%) and peripheral neurotoxicity (66.2%), respectively, and the most common >= Grade 3 hematological and non-hematological adverse events were neutropenia (40.5%) and peripheral neurotoxicity (6.8%), respectively in patients who received S-1 maintenance. ConclusionsOur real-world study showed that S-1 maintenance after tumor response or stable disease induced by first-line NPS treatment was effective and well-tolerated for some patients with APAC, which offers a promising alternative treatment strategy with encouraging survival for APAC.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of adjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 with S-1 monotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Retrospective real-world data
    Tang, Hui
    Qiao, Caixia
    Lu, Jun
    Cheng, Yuejuan
    Dai, Menghua
    Zhang, Taiping
    Guo, Junchao
    Wang, Yingyi
    Bai, Chunmei
    NEOPLASIA, 2022, 34
  • [32] Chemotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer: Comparative Study of Gemcitabine, S-1, and FOLFIRINOX, Nab-Paclitaxel plus Gem
    Miyata, H.
    Yamago, H.
    Ueki, H.
    Nagamatsu, K.
    Iwasaki, R.
    PANCREAS, 2019, 48 (10) : 1492 - 1492
  • [33] Docetexal plus S-1 Versus Oxaliplatin plus S-1 for First-Line Treatment of Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Study
    Wang, Mei
    Wu, Meihong
    Wang, Wei
    Wang, Qingshui
    Wang, Yajie
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2014, 37 (1-2) : 24 - 28
  • [34] Concurrent docetaxel and S-1 compared with oxaliplatin and s-1 as first-line therapy for advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: A retrospective study.
    Tan, Siyi
    Xie, Jiaqi
    Wei, Jia
    Liu, Qin
    Du, Juan
    Liu, Baorui
    Yang, Yang
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (15)
  • [35] A phase 1 study of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel/S-1 (GAS) combination neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma
    Naru Kondo
    Yoshiaki Murakami
    Kenichiro Uemura
    Takeshi Sudo
    Yasushi Hashimoto
    Naoya Nakagawa
    Shinya Takahashi
    Hiroki Ohge
    Taijiro Sueda
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2017, 79 : 775 - 781
  • [36] Efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus S-1 vs. gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in treatment-na?ve advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
    Zhou Zhu
    Hui Tang
    Jinrong Ying
    Yuejuan Cheng
    Xiang Wang
    Yingyi Wang
    Chunmei Bai
    Cancer Biology & Medicine, 2023, 20 (10) : 765 - 778
  • [37] Efficacy of S-1 in 2L chemotherapy after nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer
    Iede, Kiyotsugu
    Ikenaga, Masakazu
    Yamada, Terumasa
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30
  • [38] Efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus S-1 vs. gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in treatment-naïve advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
    Zhu, Zhou
    Tang, Hui
    Ying, Jinrong
    Cheng, Yuejuan
    Wang, Xiang
    Wang, Yingyi
    Bai, Chunmei
    CANCER BIOLOGY & MEDICINE, 2023, 20 (10) : 765 - 778
  • [39] A phase 1 study of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel/S-1 (GAS) combination neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma
    Kondo, Naru
    Murakami, Yoshiaki
    Uemura, Kenichiro
    Sudo, Takeshi
    Hashimoto, Yasushi
    Nakagawa, Naoya
    Takahashi, Shinya
    Ohge, Hiroki
    Sueda, Taijiro
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 79 (04) : 775 - 781
  • [40] Efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus S-1 vs. gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in treatment-na?ve advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
    Zhou Zhu
    Hui Tang
    Jinrong Ying
    Yuejuan Cheng
    Xiang Wang
    Yingyi Wang
    Chunmei Bai
    Cancer Biology & Medicine, 2023, (10) : 765 - 778