EUCAST disc diffusion criteria for the detection of mecA-Mediated β-lactam resistance in Staphylococcus pseudintermedius: oxacillin versus cefoxitin

被引:10
|
作者
Skov, R. [1 ]
Varga, A. [2 ]
Matuschek, E. [2 ]
Ahman, J. [2 ]
Bemis, D. [3 ]
Bengtsson, B. [4 ]
Sunde, M. [5 ]
Humphries, R. [6 ,7 ]
Westblade, L. [8 ]
Guardabassi, L. [9 ,10 ]
Kahlmeter, G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Statens Serum Inst, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] EUCAST Dev Lab, Vaxjo, Sweden
[3] Univ Tennessee, Knoxville, TN USA
[4] Natl Vet Inst, Uppsala, Sweden
[5] Norwegian Vet Inst, Oslo, Norway
[6] Accelerate Diagnost, Tucson, AZ USA
[7] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
[8] Weill Cornell Med, New York, NY USA
[9] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Dept Vet & Anim Sci, Copenhagen, Denmark
[10] Royal Vet Coll, Dept Pathobiol & Populat Sci, Hatfield, Herts, England
关键词
Cefoxitin; mecA-positive S.pseudintermedius; Methicillin resistance; Oxacillin; Susceptibility testing; Staphylococcus pseudintermedius; ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE; METHICILLIN RESISTANCE; INTERMEDIUS GROUP; CLINICAL-SAMPLES; SUSCEPTIBILITY; ANIMALS; BREAKPOINTS; POPULATION; EUROPE; AUREUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cmi.2019.05.002
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objectives: Until recently, the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) recommended the cefoxitin disc to screen for mecA-mediated beta-lactam resistance in Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. A recent study indicated that cefoxitin was inferior to oxacillin in this respect. We have re-evaluated cefoxitin and oxacillin discs for screening for methicillin resistance in S. pseudintermedius. Methods: We included 224 animal and human S. pseudintermedius isolates from Europe (n = 108) and North America (n = 116), of which 109 were mecA-positive. Disc diffusion was performed per EUCAST recommendations using 30-mu g cefoxitin and 1-mu g oxacillin discs from three manufacturers and Mueller-Hinton agar from two manufacturers. Results: Cefoxitin inhibition zones ranged from 6 to 33 mm for mecA-positive S. pseudintermedius (MRSP) and from 29 to 41 mm for mecA-negative S. pseudintermedius (MSSP). The corresponding oxacillin zone intervals were 6-20 mm and 19-30 mm. For cefoxitin 16% (95% CI 14.8-18.0%) of the isolates were in the area where positive and negative results overlapped. For oxacillin the corresponding number was 2% (1.6-2.9%). For oxacillin a breakpoint of susceptible (S) >= 20 mm and resistant (R) <20 mm resulted in only 0.4% and 1.1% very major error and major error rates respectively. Conclusions: This investigation confirms that the 1-mu g oxacillin disc predicts mecA-mediated methicillin resistance in S. pseudintermedius better than the 30-mu g cefoxitin disc. For a 1-mu g oxacillin disc we propose that 20 mm should be used as cut off for resistance, i.e. isolates with a zone diameter <20 mm are resistant to all beta-lactam antibiotics except those with activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococci. (c) 2019 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:122.e1 / 122.e6
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条