Mycophenolate Pharmacokinetics and Association with Response to Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease Treatment from the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network

被引:30
|
作者
Jacobson, Pamala A. [1 ]
Huang, Jiayin [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Juan [3 ]
Kim, Miae [1 ]
Logan, Brent [4 ]
Alousi, Amin [5 ]
Grimley, Michael [6 ]
Bolanos-Meade, Javier [7 ]
Ho, Vincent [8 ]
Levine, John E. [9 ]
Weisdorf, Daniel [10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Coll Pharm, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Vertex Pharmaceut, Clin Pharmacol, Cambridge, MA USA
[3] EMMES Corp, Rockville, MD USA
[4] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Populat Hlth, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[5] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Stem Cell Transplantat & Cellular Therapy, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[6] Texas Transplant Inst, San Antonio, TX USA
[7] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Oncol, Baltimore, MD USA
[8] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Med Oncol Hematol Oncol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[9] Univ Michigan, Dept Pediat & Internal Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[10] Univ Minnesota, Sch Med, Div Hematol Oncol & Transplantat, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
Mycophenolate mofetil; Mycophenolic acid; Pharmacokinetics; acute GVHD; HEMATOPOIETIC-CELL TRANSPLANTATION; RENAL-ALLOGRAFT RECIPIENTS; KIDNEY-TRANSPLANTATION; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; ACID EXPOSURE; PHARMACODYNAMIC RELATIONSHIP; MOFETIL BIOAVAILABILITY; DENILEUKIN DIFTITOX; STEROID-RESISTANT; ACUTE REJECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.11.010
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
There are limited data as to the effectiveness of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) plus high-dose corticosteroids for the treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), and even less data regarding the pharmacokinetic disposition and exposure response relationship of MMF in individuals with GVHD. MMF pharmacokinetics were studied in a multicenter Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network randomized phase 11 trial evaluating the effectiveness of MMF as one of 4 agents added to corticosteroids as treatment of aGVHD. Thirty-two of the patients randomized to receive MMF underwent pharmacokinetic sampling in weeks 1 and 2 were studied. Mean age was 41 +/- 13.6 years. Twenty one (65.6%), 5 (15.6%), 6 (18.8%) patients had a complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or lesser response by day 28, respectively. Twenty-five (78.1%), 2 (6.3%), 5 (15.6%) patients had a CR, PR, or other response by day 56 to treatment, respectively. Mycophenolic acid (MPA) pharmacokinetic measurements from weeks 1 and 2 did not correlate with CR at either day 28 or day 56 (P > .07); however, if the mean of weeks 1 and 2 total MPA troughs was >0.5 mu g/mL or that of an unbound trough was >0.015 mu g/mL, then a significantly greater proportion achieved CR + PR at days 28 and 56. CR + PR at day 28 was observed in 19 of 19 patients (100%) with a mean total trough >0.5 mg/mL, but in only 7 of 13 (54%) with a mean total trough <= 0.5 mu g/mL (P = .002). Similarly, CR + PR at day 28 was seen in 15 of 15 patients (100%) with an unbound trough concentration >0.015 mu g/mL, but in only 11 of 17 (65%) with an unbound trough concentration <= 0.015 mu g/mL (P = .02). There was no association between the pharmacokinetic measures and risk of infection by day 90 or overall survival (OS) at day 180 postrandomization. About one-half of subjects did not achieve the favorable MPA total and unbound trough concentrations. The current practice of MMF 1 gm twice daily dosing provides low plasma concentrations in many patients. Higher doses may improve the efficacy of MMF as aGVHD therapy. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 16: 421-429 (2010) (C) 2010 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 429
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mycophenolate mofetil for the treatment of acute and chronic steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease
    Marta Krejci
    Michael Doubek
    Tomas Buchler
    Yvona Brychtova
    Jiri Vorlicek
    Jiri Mayer
    Annals of Hematology, 2005, 84 : 681 - 685
  • [22] Mycophenolate mofetil for the treatment of acute and chronic steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease
    Krejci, M
    Doubek, M
    Buehler, T
    Brychtova, Y
    Vorlicek, J
    Mayer, J
    ANNALS OF HEMATOLOGY, 2005, 84 (10) : 681 - 685
  • [23] The clinical spectrum of acute graft-versus-host disease
    Deeg, HJ
    Antin, JH
    SEMINARS IN HEMATOLOGY, 2006, 43 (01) : 24 - 31
  • [24] Acute intestinal graft-versus-host disease in a syngeneic bone marrow transplant recipient.
    Spaner, D
    Lowsky, R
    Fyles, G
    Lipton, JH
    Banerjee, D
    Ng, CM
    Wade, JA
    Messner, HA
    TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, 66 (09) : 1251 - 1253
  • [25] Prophylaxis and treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease
    Chao, NJ
    Chen, BJ
    SEMINARS IN HEMATOLOGY, 2006, 43 (01) : 32 - 41
  • [26] PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF ACUTE GRAFT-VERSUS-HOST DISEASE
    HERVE, P
    PRESSE MEDICALE, 1991, 20 (33): : 1614 - 1621
  • [27] PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF ACUTE GRAFT-VERSUS-HOST DISEASE
    NEUDORF, S
    FILIPOVICH, A
    RAMSAY, N
    KERSEY, J
    SEMINARS IN HEMATOLOGY, 1984, 21 (02) : 91 - 100
  • [28] Advances in the treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease
    Qian, Liren
    Wu, Zhengcheng
    Shen, Jianliang
    JOURNAL OF CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE, 2013, 17 (08) : 966 - 975
  • [29] Treatment of gastrointestinal acute graft-versus-host disease
    Ross W.A.
    Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology, 2005, 8 (3) : 249 - 258
  • [30] Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prognosis: Are Biomarkers Ready for Preemptive Clinical Trials?
    Paczesny, Sophie
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2017, 63 (10) : 1561 - 1563