Prospective randomized trial comparing efficacy of letrozole step-up protocol with letrozole plus gonadotropins for controlled ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination in patients with unexplained infertility

被引:3
|
作者
Kaur, Japleen [1 ]
Suri, Vanita [1 ]
Gainder, Shalini [1 ]
Arora, Aashima [1 ]
机构
[1] Postgrad Inst Med Educ & Res PGIMER, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Nehru Hosp, 3rd Floor, Chandigarh, India
关键词
Unexplained infertility; Controlled ovarian stimulation; Letrozole; Superovulation; Insemination; CITRATE;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-019-05326-2
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Purpose Empirical treatment options for unexplained infertility treatment include controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with clomiphene citrate, letrozole or gonadotropins followed by intrauterine insemination (IUI). Achieving consistent multifollicular development with letrozole generally requires addition of gonadotropins. However, the cost and discomfort of injections remains a drawback of this regimen. Therefore, there is a need for evolving newer cost-effective regimens for COS/IUI using orally administered drugs like letrozole. Methods Sixty couples with unexplained infertility (on standard infertility investigations) visiting the infertility clinic at a tertiary centre in North India were randomized into two groups. Group A COS was done by step-up protocol of letrozole from day 2 or 3 of menstrual cycle, starting with 2.5 mg and increased by 2.5 mg per day for next 3 days (2.5 mg, 5 mg, 7.5 mg, 10 mg). Group B COS was done with combination of letrozole and hMG (human menopausal gonadotropin). Starting from day 2 or 3 of menses, tablet letrozole 2.5 mg twice a day was given for 5 days. Intramuscular injection of hMG 150 IU was given every alternate day starting from day 7 and titrated according to the response. HCG was given when leading follicle was 17 mm and IUI done 36 h after HCG. Results Twenty-eight couples in letrozole step-up group (group A) and 30 couples in letrozole plus hMG group (group B), completed follow up for 44 and 55 cycles, respectively. Mean numbers of follicle >= 16 mm in both groups were comparable: 1.74 (+/- 0.83) in group A and 1.94 (+/- 0.68) in group B (p = 0.178). Ovulation rate of 90.9% (40/44) was achieved in group A, whereas it was 100% (55/55) in group B (p = 0.022), although there was no significant difference in clinical pregnancy rate per patient, which was 3/28 (10.7%) in group A versus 5/30 (16.67%) in group B (p = 0.707). The mean (SD) cost of medicines was significantly lower in group A Rs. 345.00 (00) compared to group B Rs. 2148.64 (515.67) [p < 0.0001]. There was one case each of hyperstimulation and multiple pregnancies in group B, while none in group A. Conclusion It is possible to achieve multifollicular development with use of novel letrozole step-up protocol, even without addition of gonadotropins, at significantly lower cost.
引用
收藏
页码:1767 / 1771
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING 2 DIFFERENT INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION REGIMENS IN CONTROLLED OVARIAN HYPERSTIMULATION CYCLES
    SILVERBERG, KM
    JOHNSON, JV
    OLIVE, DL
    BURNS, WN
    SCHENKEN, RS
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1992, 57 (02) : 357 - 361
  • [22] Safety of ovarian stimulation with letrozole and gonadotropins in breast cancer patients undergoing embryo or oocyte cryopreservation: A prospective controlled study.
    Azim, A. M. A.
    Oktay, K.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2007, 88 : S33 - S34
  • [23] Safety of ovarian stimulation with letrozole and gonadotropins in breast cancer patients undergoing embryo or oocyte cryopreservation: A prospective controlled study.
    Azim, A. M. A.
    Oktay, K.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2007, 88 : S33 - S33
  • [24] A randomized controlled trial of intrauterine insemination with clomiphene citrate stimulation compared with expectant management for women with unexplained infertility (The TUI study)
    Farquhar, C. M.
    Liu, E.
    Armstrong, S.
    Arroll, N.
    Lensen, S.
    Brown, J.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2017, 32 : 5 - 5
  • [25] Recombinant FSH versus clomiphene citrate for ovarian stimulation in couples with unexplained infertility and male subfertility undergoing intrauterine insemination: a randomized trial
    Berker, Bulent
    Kahraman, Korhan
    Taskin, Salih
    Sukur, Yavuz Emre
    Sonmezer, Murat
    Atabekoglu, Cem Somer
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2011, 284 (06) : 1561 - 1566
  • [26] Recombinant FSH versus clomiphene citrate for ovarian stimulation in couples with unexplained infertility and male subfertility undergoing intrauterine insemination: a randomized trial
    Bulent Berker
    Korhan Kahraman
    Salih Taskin
    Yavuz Emre Sukur
    Murat Sonmezer
    Cem Somer Atabekoglu
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2011, 284 : 1561 - 1566
  • [27] INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION AFTER OVARIAN STIMULATION AS A TREATMENT FOR SUBFERTILITY BECAUSE OF SUBNORMAL SEMEN - A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    HO, PC
    SO, WK
    CHAN, YF
    YEUNG, WSB
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1992, 58 (05) : 995 - 999
  • [28] The effect of progesterone supplementation on pregnancy rates in controlled ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination cycles: a randomized prospective trial
    Agha-Hosseini, Marzieh
    Rahmani, Mahboobeh
    Alleyassin, Ashraf
    Safdarian, Leila
    Sarvi, Fatemeh
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2012, 165 (02) : 249 - 253
  • [29] Mild stimulation protocol vs conventional controlled ovarian stimulation protocol in poor ovarian response patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Xiaoping Liu
    Tingting Li
    Bo Wang
    Xuefen Xiao
    Xiaoyan Liang
    Rui Huang
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2020, 301 : 1331 - 1339
  • [30] Mild stimulation protocol vs conventional controlled ovarian stimulation protocol in poor ovarian response patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Liu, Xiaoping
    Li, Tingting
    Wang, Bo
    Xiao, Xuefen
    Liang, Xiaoyan
    Huang, Rui
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2020, 301 (05) : 1331 - 1339