Autonomous Shared Mobility-On-Demand: Melbourne Pilot Simulation Study

被引:75
|
作者
Dia, Hussein [1 ]
Javanshour, Farid [1 ]
机构
[1] Swinburne Univ Technol, Dept Civil & Construct Engn, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
autonomous vehicles; autonomous shared mobility-on-demand; smart cities; smart mobility;
D O I
10.1016/j.trpro.2017.03.035
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
This paper presents results from a simulation-based study which aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of using agent-based simulation tools to model the impacts of shared autonomous vehicles. First, the paper outlines a research framework for the development and evaluation of low carbon mobility solutions driven by two disruptive forces which are changing the mobility landscape and providing consumers with more choices to meet their transport needs: automated self-driving and on-demand shared mobility services. The focus of this paper is on development of rigorous models for understanding the demand for travel in the age of connected mobility, and assessing their impacts particularly under scenarios of autonomous or self-driving ondemand shared mobility. To demonstrate the feasibility of the approach, the paper provides initial results from a pilot study on a small road network in Melbourne, Australia. A base case scenario representing the current situation of using traditional privately owned vehicles, and two autonomous mobility on-demand (AMoD) scenarios were simulated on a real transport network. In the first scenario (AMoD1), it was assumed that the on-demand vehicles were immediately available to passengers (maximum waiting times is zero). This constraint was relaxed in the second scenario (AMoD2) by increasing the allowable passenger waiting times up to a maximum of 5 minutes. The results showed that using the AMoD system resulted in a significant reduction in both the number of vehicles required to meet the transport needs of the community (reduction of 43% in AMoD1, and 88% in AMoD2), and the required on-street parking space (reduction of 58% in AMoD1 and 83% in AMoD2). However, the simulation also showed that this was achieved at the expense of a less significant increase in the total VKT (increase of 29% in AMoD1 and 10% in AMoD2). The paper concludes by describing how the model is being extended, the remaining challenges that need to be overcome in this research, and outlines the next steps to achieve the desired outcomes. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 296
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hierarchical Control for Vehicle Repositioning in Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand Systems
    Zhu, Pengbo
    Ferrari-Trecate, Giancarlo
    Geroliminis, Nikolas
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, 2024,
  • [22] A Double-Layered MPC of Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand Systems
    Wang, Yujie
    Lou, Yuanyuan
    Li, Shaoyuan
    [J]. 2022 41ST CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE (CCC), 2022, : 2670 - 2675
  • [23] Mobility-on-demand public transport toward spatial justice: Shared mobility or Mobility as a Service
    Qiao, Si
    Yeh, Anthony Gar-On
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 123
  • [24] On the Interaction between Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand and Public Transportation Systems
    Salazar, Mauro
    Rossi, Federico
    Schiffer, Maximilian
    Onder, Christopher H.
    Pavone, Marco
    [J]. 2018 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITSC), 2018, : 2262 - 2269
  • [25] Autonomous Personal Mobility Scooter for Multi-Class Mobility-on-Demand Service
    Andersen, Hans
    Eng, You Hong
    Leong, Wei Kang
    Zhang, Chen
    Kong, Hai Xun
    Pendleton, Scott
    Ang, Marcelo H., Jr.
    Rus, Daniela
    [J]. 2016 IEEE 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITSC), 2016, : 1753 - 1760
  • [26] A Model Predictive Control Scheme for Intermodal Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand
    Zgraggen, Jannik
    Tsao, Matthew
    Salazar, Mauro
    Schiffer, Maximilian
    Pavone, Marco
    [J]. 2019 IEEE INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (ITSC), 2019, : 1953 - 1960
  • [27] Autonomous Golf Cars for Public Trial of Mobility-on-Demand Service
    Pendleton, Scott
    Uthaicharoenpong, Tawit
    Chong, Zhuang Jie
    Fu, Guo Ming James
    Qin, Baoxing
    Liu, Wei
    Shen, Xiaotong
    Weng, Zhiyong
    Kamin, Cody
    Ang, Mark Adam
    Kuwae, Lucas Tetsuya
    Marczuk, Katarzyna Anna
    Andersen, Hans
    Feng, Mengdan
    Butron, Gregory
    Chong, Zhuang Zhi
    Ang, Marcelo H., Jr.
    Frazzoli, Emilio
    Rus, Daniela
    [J]. 2015 IEEE/RSJ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND SYSTEMS (IROS), 2015, : 1164 - 1171
  • [28] Autonomous personal mobility scooter for multi-class mobility-on-demand service
    [J]. 1753, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., United States (00):
  • [29] Integrated Charging Facility and Fleet Planning for Shared Mobility-on-Demand System
    Huang, Xianchao
    Tian, Min
    Tan, Wenrui
    Ding, Zhaohao
    [J]. 2021 IEEE IAS INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL POWER SYSTEM ASIA (IEEE I&CPS ASIA 2021), 2021, : 277 - 283
  • [30] Joint Mobility and Vehicle-to-Grid Coordination in Rebalancing Shared Mobility-on-Demand Systems
    Zeng, Teng
    Moura, Scott
    Zhou, Zhe
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2023, 56 (02): : 6642 - 6647