Autonomous Shared Mobility-On-Demand: Melbourne Pilot Simulation Study

被引:75
|
作者
Dia, Hussein [1 ]
Javanshour, Farid [1 ]
机构
[1] Swinburne Univ Technol, Dept Civil & Construct Engn, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
autonomous vehicles; autonomous shared mobility-on-demand; smart cities; smart mobility;
D O I
10.1016/j.trpro.2017.03.035
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
This paper presents results from a simulation-based study which aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of using agent-based simulation tools to model the impacts of shared autonomous vehicles. First, the paper outlines a research framework for the development and evaluation of low carbon mobility solutions driven by two disruptive forces which are changing the mobility landscape and providing consumers with more choices to meet their transport needs: automated self-driving and on-demand shared mobility services. The focus of this paper is on development of rigorous models for understanding the demand for travel in the age of connected mobility, and assessing their impacts particularly under scenarios of autonomous or self-driving ondemand shared mobility. To demonstrate the feasibility of the approach, the paper provides initial results from a pilot study on a small road network in Melbourne, Australia. A base case scenario representing the current situation of using traditional privately owned vehicles, and two autonomous mobility on-demand (AMoD) scenarios were simulated on a real transport network. In the first scenario (AMoD1), it was assumed that the on-demand vehicles were immediately available to passengers (maximum waiting times is zero). This constraint was relaxed in the second scenario (AMoD2) by increasing the allowable passenger waiting times up to a maximum of 5 minutes. The results showed that using the AMoD system resulted in a significant reduction in both the number of vehicles required to meet the transport needs of the community (reduction of 43% in AMoD1, and 88% in AMoD2), and the required on-street parking space (reduction of 58% in AMoD1 and 83% in AMoD2). However, the simulation also showed that this was achieved at the expense of a less significant increase in the total VKT (increase of 29% in AMoD1 and 10% in AMoD2). The paper concludes by describing how the model is being extended, the remaining challenges that need to be overcome in this research, and outlines the next steps to achieve the desired outcomes. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 296
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intermodal Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand
    Salazar, Mauro
    Lanzetti, Nicolas
    Rossi, Federico
    Schiffer, Maximilian
    Pavone, Marco
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2020, 21 (09) : 3946 - 3960
  • [2] SAMoD: Shared Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand using Decentralized Reinforcement Learning
    Gueriau, Maxime
    Dusparic, Ivana
    [J]. 2018 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITSC), 2018, : 1558 - 1563
  • [3] Value of demand information in autonomous mobility-on-demand systems
    Wen, Jian
    Nassir, Neema
    Zhao, Jinhua
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2019, 121 : 346 - 359
  • [4] AMoDeus, a Simulation-Based Testbed for Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand Systems
    Ruch, Claudio
    Horl, Sebastian
    Frazzoli, Emilio
    [J]. 2018 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITSC), 2018, : 3639 - 3644
  • [5] Analysis and Control of Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand Systems
    Zardini, Gioele
    Lanzetti, Nicolas
    Pavone, Marco
    Frazzoli, Emilio
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF CONTROL ROBOTICS AND AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS, 2022, 5 : 633 - 658
  • [6] Optimal Online Dispatch for High-Capacity Shared Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand Systems
    Li, Cheng
    Parker, David
    Hao, Qi
    [J]. 2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION (ICRA 2021), 2021, : 779 - 785
  • [7] Competition in Electric Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand Systems
    Turan, Berkay
    Alizadeh, Mahnoosh
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL OF NETWORK SYSTEMS, 2022, 9 (01): : 295 - 307
  • [8] Model Predictive Control of Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand Systems
    Zhang, Rick
    Rossi, Federico
    Pavone, Marco
    [J]. 2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION (ICRA), 2016, : 1382 - 1389
  • [9] Joint Pricing and Rebalancing of Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand Systems
    Wollenstein-Betech, Salomon
    Paschalidis, Ioannis Ch
    Cassandras, Christos G.
    [J]. 2020 59TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2020, : 2573 - 2578
  • [10] Revenue Uncertainty Analysis for Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand System
    Sun, Yimeng
    Huang, Yuan
    Ding, Zhaohao
    [J]. 2022 IEEE/IAS INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL POWER SYSTEM ASIA (I&CPS ASIA 2022), 2022, : 631 - 636