Projected streamflow in the Huaihe River Basin (2010-2100) using artificial neural network

被引:58
|
作者
Gao, Chao [2 ,4 ,6 ]
Gemmer, Marco [1 ]
Zeng, Xiaofan [3 ]
Liu, Bo [2 ,6 ]
Su, Buda [1 ]
Wen, Yuhua [5 ]
机构
[1] China Meteorol Adm, Natl Climate Ctr, Ctr Climate Change, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Nanjing Inst Geog & Limnol, State Key Lab Lake Sci & Environm, Nanjing 210008, Peoples R China
[3] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Hydropower & Informat Engn, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[4] Anhui Normal Univ, Coll Terr Resources & Tourism, Wuhu 241000, Peoples R China
[5] Hydrol Bur Jiangsu Prov, Nanjing 210029, Peoples R China
[6] Chinese Acad Sci, Grad Sch, Beijing 100039, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Observed data; Streamflow projection; Artificial neural networks; The Huaihe Basin; CLIMATE-CHANGE; RAINFALL; PRECIPITATION; IMPACT; TREND; CHINA; VARIABILITY; YANGTZE; TESTS; FUZZY;
D O I
10.1007/s00477-009-0355-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Climate projections for the Huaihe River Basin, China, for the years 2001-2100 are derived from the ECHAM5/MPI-OM model based on observed precipitation and temperature data covering 1964-2007. Streamflow for the Huaihe River under three emission scenarios (SRES-A2, A1B, B1) from 2010 to 2100 is then projected by applying artificial neural networks (ANN). The results show that annual streamflow will change significantly under the three scenarios from 2010 to 2100. The interannual fluctuations cover a significant increasing streamflow trend under the SRES-A2 scenario (2051-2085). The streamflow trend declines gradually under the SRES-A1B scenario (2024-2037), and shows no obvious trend under the SRES-B1 scenario. From 2010 to 2100, the correlation coefficient between the observed and modeled streamflow in SRES-A2 scenario is the best of the three scenarios. Combining SRES-A2 scenario of the ECHAM5 model and ANN might therefore be the best approach for assessing and projecting future water resources in the Huaihe basin and other catchments. Compared to the observed period of streamflows, the projected periodicity of streamflows shows significant changes under different emission scenarios. Under A2 scenario and A1B scenario, the period would delay to about 32-33a and 27-28a, respectively, but under B1 scenario, the period would not change, as it is about 5-6a and the observed period is about 7-8a. All this might affect drought/flood management, water supply and irrigation projects in the Huaihe River basin.
引用
收藏
页码:685 / 697
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Spatial predication of flood zonation mapping in Kan River Basin, Iran, using artificial neural network algorithm
    Jahangir, Mohammad Hossein
    Reineh, Seyedeh Mahsa Mousavi
    Abolghasemi, Mahnaz
    WEATHER AND CLIMATE EXTREMES, 2019, 25
  • [42] Landslide Susceptibility Model Using Artificial Neural Network (ANN) Approach in Langat River Basin, Selangor, Malaysia
    Selamat, Siti Norsakinah
    Abd Majid, Nuriah
    Taha, Mohd Raihan
    Osman, Ashraf
    LAND, 2022, 11 (06)
  • [43] Prediction of stream water quality in Godavari River Basin, India using statistical and artificial neural network models
    Satish, Nagalapalli
    Jagadeesh, Anmala
    Rajitha, K.
    Varma, Raja Raja Murari
    H2OPEN JOURNAL, 2022, 5 (04) : 621 - 641
  • [44] Daily streamflow forecasting using a wavelet transform and artificial neural network hybrid models
    Guimaraes Santos, Celso Augusto
    Lima da Silva, Gustavo Barbosa
    HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2014, 59 (02): : 312 - 324
  • [45] The Application of the Artificial Neural Network Ensemble Model for Simulating Streamflow
    Lee, Do-Hun
    Kang, Doo-Sun
    12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HYDROINFORMATICS (HIC 2016) - SMART WATER FOR THE FUTURE, 2016, 154 : 1217 - 1224
  • [46] Streamflow forecasting by modeling the rainfall–streamflow relationship using artificial neural networks
    Shahzad Ali
    Muhammad Shahbaz
    Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2020, 6 : 1645 - 1656
  • [47] Monthly flow forecast for Mississippi River basin using artificial neural networks
    Sivapragasam, C.
    Vanitha, S.
    Muttil, Nitin
    Suganya, K.
    Suji, S.
    Selvi, M. Thamarai
    Selvi, R.
    Sudha, S. Jeya
    NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2014, 24 (7-8): : 1785 - 1793
  • [48] Stream Flow Forecasting in Mahanadi River Basin using Artificial Neural Networks
    Sahoo, Abinash
    Samantaray, Sandeep
    Ghose, Dillip K.
    4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (ICCSCI 2019) : ENABLING COLLABORATION TO ESCALATE IMPACT OF RESEARCH RESULTS FOR SOCIETY, 2019, 157 : 168 - 174
  • [49] Monthly flow forecast for Mississippi River basin using artificial neural networks
    C. Sivapragasam
    S. Vanitha
    Nitin Muttil
    K. Suganya
    S. Suji
    M. Thamarai Selvi
    R. Selvi
    S. Jeya Sudha
    Neural Computing and Applications, 2014, 24 : 1785 - 1793
  • [50] >Water quality prediction of artificial intelligence model: a case of Huaihe River Basin, China
    Chen, Jing
    Li, Haiyang
    Felix, Manirankunda
    Chen, Yudi
    Zheng, Keqiang
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2024, 31 (10) : 14610 - 14640