The selection of talent as a group process. A literature review on the social dynamics of decision making in grant panels

被引:28
|
作者
van Arensbergen, Pleun [1 ]
van der Weijden, Inge [2 ]
van den Besselaar, Peter [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Nijmegen Sch Management, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Ctr Sci & Technol Studies CWTS, Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Network Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Org Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
SCIENTIFIC EXCELLENCE; INFORMATION; IDENTITY; ACCOUNTABILITY; NEGOTIATION; RELIABILITY; PERFORMANCE; VALIDATION; APPLICANTS; PSYCHOLOGY;
D O I
10.1093/reseval/rvu017
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Talent selection within science is increasingly performed by panels, e.g. by reviewing grant or fellowship applications. Many studies from fields of sociology of science and science policy studies have been conducted to identify biases and predict outcomes of these processes, mainly focusing on characteristics of applicants, applications, and reviewers. However, as panel reviewing entails social interaction, group dynamics influence these processes. By adding insights from social psychology to current knowledge on panel reviews, we are better able to identify factors affecting talent selection and funding decisions in grant panels. By opening up this so-called black box, we aim to contribute to a better understanding of the dynamics of panel decision making. This knowledge is also relevant for various stakeholders involved in grant allocation, for applicants, reviewers, and policymakers, as it can be used to improve transparency, fairness, and legitimation of talent selection processes.
引用
收藏
页码:298 / 311
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multi-attribute group decision making with opinion dynamics based on social trust network
    Li, Yanhong
    Kou, Gang
    Li, Guangxu
    Wang, Haomin
    INFORMATION FUSION, 2021, 75 : 102 - 115
  • [42] Heterogeneous Opinion Dynamics Considering Consensus Evolution in Social Network Group Decision-Making
    Wu, Tong
    GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2024, 33 (01) : 159 - 194
  • [43] Heterogeneous Opinion Dynamics Considering Consensus Evolution in Social Network Group Decision-Making
    Tong Wu
    Group Decision and Negotiation, 2024, 33 : 159 - 194
  • [44] Numerical Study of the Consensus Degree Between Social Network Users in the Group Decision Making Process
    Chukhno, Olga
    Chukhno, Nadezhda
    Gaidamaka, Anna
    Samouylov, Konstantin
    Herrera-Viedma, Enrique
    INTERNET OF THINGS, SMART SPACES, AND NEXT GENERATION NETWORKS AND SYSTEMS, NEW2AN 2019, RUSMART 2019, 2019, 11660 : 586 - 598
  • [45] Psychological Trust Dynamics in Climate Change Adaptation Decision-Making Processes: A Literature Review
    Bonfanti, Rubinia Celeste
    Ruggieri, Stefano
    Schimmenti, Adriano
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (10)
  • [46] The Role of Information Retrieval in the Diagnostic/Decision making Process within the Medical Appointment: A Review of the Literature
    Twomey, Michael
    Sammon, David
    Nagle, Tadhg
    JOURNAL OF DECISION SYSTEMS, 2021, 30 (04) : 378 - 409
  • [47] Dealing with cultural diversity during the process of communication and decision-making in the ICU: a literature review
    RV Van Keer
    RD Deschepper
    LH Huyghens
    WD Distelmans
    JB Bilsen
    Critical Care, 18 (Suppl 1):
  • [48] SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW ON THE IMPLICIT FACTORS INFLUENCING THE HTA DECISION-MAKING PROCESS IN EUROPE
    Monleon, C.
    Toumi, M.
    Spath, H. M.
    Crespo, C.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 : S666 - S666
  • [49] The Evolving Role of the Nurse During the Cancer Treatment Decision-Making Process: A Literature Review
    Tariman, Joseph D.
    Szubski, Katharine L.
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2015, 19 (05) : 548 - 556
  • [50] THE CONSUMER DECISION-MAKING PROCESS WHICH FORM DOMESTIC BRAND LOYALTY: A LITERATURE REVIEW
    Haziri, Fortesa
    Chovancova, Miloslava
    Aliu, Florin
    14TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL BATA CONFERENCE FOR PH.D. STUDENTS AND YOUNG RESEARCHERS (DOKBAT), 2018, : 95 - 102