The selection of talent as a group process. A literature review on the social dynamics of decision making in grant panels

被引:28
|
作者
van Arensbergen, Pleun [1 ]
van der Weijden, Inge [2 ]
van den Besselaar, Peter [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Nijmegen Sch Management, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Ctr Sci & Technol Studies CWTS, Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Network Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Org Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
SCIENTIFIC EXCELLENCE; INFORMATION; IDENTITY; ACCOUNTABILITY; NEGOTIATION; RELIABILITY; PERFORMANCE; VALIDATION; APPLICANTS; PSYCHOLOGY;
D O I
10.1093/reseval/rvu017
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Talent selection within science is increasingly performed by panels, e.g. by reviewing grant or fellowship applications. Many studies from fields of sociology of science and science policy studies have been conducted to identify biases and predict outcomes of these processes, mainly focusing on characteristics of applicants, applications, and reviewers. However, as panel reviewing entails social interaction, group dynamics influence these processes. By adding insights from social psychology to current knowledge on panel reviews, we are better able to identify factors affecting talent selection and funding decisions in grant panels. By opening up this so-called black box, we aim to contribute to a better understanding of the dynamics of panel decision making. This knowledge is also relevant for various stakeholders involved in grant allocation, for applicants, reviewers, and policymakers, as it can be used to improve transparency, fairness, and legitimation of talent selection processes.
引用
收藏
页码:298 / 311
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PATIENTS' PREFERENCES FOR RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS TREATMENTS AND THEIR PARTICIPATION IN THE TREATMENT DECISION-MAKING PROCESS. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
    Dilla, T.
    Rentero, M. L.
    Comellas, M.
    Lizan, L.
    Sacristan, J. A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (07) : A652 - A652
  • [2] A review on trust propagation and opinion dynamics in social networks and group decision making frameworks
    Urena, Raquel
    Kou, Gang
    Dong, Yucheng
    Chiclana, Francisco
    Herrera-Viedma, Enrique
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2019, 478 : 461 - 475
  • [3] Decision making process in health systems: a literature review
    Flexa, Raquel
    SAUDE E SOCIEDADE, 2018, 27 (03): : 729 - 739
  • [4] GROUP DECISION-MAKING .7. DECISION-PROCESS SELECTION
    GAUTSCHI, TF
    DESIGN NEWS, 1983, 39 (10) : 146 - 146
  • [5] Multicriteria techniques for consensus in group decision making: A literature review
    Calache L.D.D.R.
    Zanon L.G.
    de Souza Feitosa I.S.C.
    Arantes R.F.M.
    Carpinetti L.C.R.
    International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 2021, 14 (06) : 661 - 688
  • [6] SUSTAINABILITY IN THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
    da Silva, Rafael Felix
    REVISTA METROPOLITANA DE SUSTENTABILIDADE, 2021, 11 (03): : 215 - 236
  • [7] A Literature Review of the Concepts of Resilience and Sustainability in Group Decision-Making
    Ardebili, Ali Aghazadeh
    Padoano, Elio
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (07)
  • [8] Process of supply chain partner selection and evaluation based on group decision making
    Chen, Jing-Jie
    Wang, Fu-Dong
    Zhu, Yun-Long
    Xue, Jin-Song
    Kongzhi yu Juece/Control and Decision, 2002, 17 (SUPPL.): : 690 - 694
  • [9] Using Analytic Network Process in a Group Decision-Making for Supplier Selection
    Sadeghi, Mohammadreza
    Rashidzadeh, Mohammad Ali
    Soukhakian, Mohammad Ali
    INFORMATICA, 2012, 23 (04) : 621 - 643
  • [10] Group decision making process for supplier selection with VIKOR under fuzzy environment
    Sanayei, Amir
    Mousavi, S. Farid
    Yazdankhah, A.
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (01) : 24 - 30