FORTE radio-frequency observations of lightning strokes detected hy the National Lightning Detection Network

被引:51
|
作者
Jacobson, AR
Cummins, KL
Carter, M
Klingner, P
Roussel-Dupré, D
Knox, SO
机构
[1] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
[2] Global Atmospher Inc, Tucson, AZ USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2000JD900103
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
This work compares simultaneous observations of lightning from two complementary systems. FORTE is a low-Earth-orbit satellite carrying radiowave and optical instruments for the study of lightning. The radio receivers aboard FORTE observe very high frequency (VHF) emissions from the air-breakdown process preceding (and sometimes accompanying) a lightning current. The National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN) is a ground-based array of sensors in the contiguous United States observing the low-frequency (LF) and very low frequency (VLF) radiation from vertical currents. Prior to the launch of FORTE in 1997, essentially no work had been done on the statistical correlations between (1) ground-based LF/VLF and (2) spaced-based VHF remote sensing of lightning. During a 6-month campaign in April-September 1998, FORTE took most of its triggered VHF data over and near the contiguous United States, and NLDN data were specially postprocessed in a loosened-criterion mode providing enhanced detection range beyond the coastline and borders of the array itself. The time history of reported events from the two systems was compared, and event pairs (each pair containing one event from FORTE, the other from NLDN) which were candidate correlations (closer than 200 ms from each other) were scrutinized to determine whether the members of a pair actually came from the same discharge process. We have found that there is a statistically significant correlation, for a subset of FORTE events, This correlation is most likely to occur for intracloud and less likely to occur for cloud-to-ground discharges. The correlated VHF and NLDN events tend to occur within +/-30 mu s of each other, after correction for the propagation of the VHF signal to FORTE from the NLDN-geolocated stroke location. Most correlations outside of +/-30 mu s turn out to be merely a statistical accident. The NLDN-furnished geolocation allows the correlated FORTE-detected VHF pulses to be better interpreted, In particular, we can deduce, from the lag of the VHF ground-reflection echo, the height of the VHF emission region in the storm.
引用
收藏
页码:15653 / 15662
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] NLDN'95: A combined TOA/MDF technology upgrade of the US National Lightning Detection Network
    Cummins, KL
    Bardo, EA
    Hiscox, WL
    Pyle, RB
    Pifer, AE
    12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTERACTIVE INFORMATION AND PROCESSING SYSTEMS (IIPS) FOR METEOROLOGY, OCEANOGRAPHY, AND HYDROLOGY: JOINT SESSION WITH FIFTH SYMPOSIUM ON EDUCATION, 1996, : 347 - 355
  • [42] Performance evaluation of the US National Lightning Detection Network in eastern New York - 1. Detection efficiency
    Idone, VP
    Davis, DA
    Moore, PK
    Wang, Y
    Henderson, RW
    Ries, M
    Jamason, PF
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1998, 103 (D8) : 9045 - 9055
  • [43] A Comprehensive Study on the Improved Radio-Frequency Magnetic Field Measurement for the Initial Upward Leader of a Negative Rocket-Triggered Lightning Flash
    Shi, Tao
    Lu, Gaopeng
    Fan, Yanfeng
    Li, Xiao
    Zhang, Yang
    REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (08)
  • [44] National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN) performance in southern Arizona, Texas, and Oklahoma in 2003-2004
    Biagi, Christopher J.
    Cummins, Kenneth L.
    Kehoe, Kenneth E.
    Krider, E. Philip
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2007, 112 (D5)
  • [45] R.SCANS NATIONAL LIGHTNING DETECTION NETWORK - THE 1ST-YEAR PROGRESS REPORT
    LYONS, WA
    BAUER, KG
    EUSTIS, AC
    MOON, DA
    PETIT, NJ
    SCHUH, JA
    INTERACTIVE INFORMATION AND PROCESSING SYSTEMS FOR METEOROLOGY, OCEANOGRAPHY AND HYDROLOGY, 1988, : 241 - 248
  • [46] Concurrent satellite and ground-based lightning observations from the Optical Lightning Imaging Sensor (ISS-LIS), the low-frequency network Meteorage and the SAETTA Lightning Mapping Array (LMA) in the northwestern Mediterranean region
    Erdmann, Felix
    Defer, Eric
    Caumont, Olivier
    Blakeslee, Richard J.
    Pedeboy, Stephane
    Coquillat, Sylvain
    ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2020, 13 (02) : 853 - 875
  • [47] Comparisons of observer reports of thunderstorms with similar reports derived from the National Lightning Detection Network data
    Seliga, TA
    Kraus, KA
    Canniff, J
    Hazen, DA
    16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTERACTIVE INFORMATION AND PROCESSING SYSTEMS (IIPS) FOR METEOROLOGY, OCEANOGRAPHY AND HYDROLOGY, 2000, : 410 - 413
  • [48] Performance evaluation of the US National Lightning Detection Network in eastern New York - 2. Location accuracy
    Idone, VP
    Davis, DA
    Moore, PK
    Wang, Y
    Henderson, RW
    Ries, M
    Jamason, PF
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1998, 103 (D8) : 9057 - 9069
  • [49] Changes in measured lightning flash count and return stroke peak current after the 1994 U.S. National Lightning Detection Network upgrade - 2. Theory
    Wacker, RS
    Orville, RE
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1999, 104 (D2) : 2159 - 2162
  • [50] 3D Radio Frequency Mapping and Polarization Observations Show Lightning Flashes Were Ignited by Cosmic-Ray Showers
    Shao, Xuan-Min
    Jensen, Daniel P.
    Ho, Cheng
    Caffrey, Michael P.
    Raby, Eric Y.
    Graham, Paul S.
    Haynes, W. Brian
    Blaine, William G.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2025, 130 (05)