Evaluating process performance based on the incapability index for measurements with uncertainty

被引:6
|
作者
Liao, Mou-Yuan [2 ]
Wu, Chien-Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Feng Chia Univ, Dept Ind Engn & Syst Management, Taichung 40724, Taiwan
[2] Yuanpei Univ, Dept Finance, Hsinchu, Taiwan
关键词
Fuzzy p-value; Hypothesis testing; Process capability analysis; PROCESS CAPABILITY; FUZZY;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.005
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Process capability indices are widely used in industry to measure the ability of firms or their suppliers to meet quality specifications. The index C-pp, which is easy to use and analytically tractable, has been successfully developed and applied by competitive firms to dominate highly-profitable markets by improving quality and productivity. Hypothesis testing is very essential for practical decision-making. Generally, the underlying data are assumed to be precise numbers, but in general it is much more realistic to consider fuzzy values, which are imprecise numbers. In this case, the test statistic also yields an imprecise number, and decision rules based on the crisp-based approach are inappropriate. This study investigates the situation of uncertain or imprecise product quality measurements. A set of confidence intervals for sample mean and variance is used to produce triangular fuzzy numbers for estimating the C-pp index. Based on the, delta-cuts of the fuzzy estimators, a decision testing rule and procedure are developed to evaluate process performance based on critical values and fuzzy p-values. An efficient computer program is also designed for calculating fuzzy p-values. Finally, an example is examined for demonstrating the application of the proposed approach. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:5999 / 6006
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluating Variability and Uncertainty of Geological Strength Index at a Specific Site
    Wang, Yu
    Aladejare, Adeyemi Emman
    ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2016, 49 (09) : 3559 - 3573
  • [42] Good Practices in Evaluating the Uncertainty of Measurements for the Conductivity of the Electrolyte Solutions
    Lazar, George
    Campureanu, Claudiu
    Cirneanu, Ioan
    Vaireanu, Danut Ionel
    REVISTA DE CHIMIE, 2017, 68 (11): : 2482 - 2487
  • [43] Uncertainty analysis in scramjet performance parameters measurements
    Liao W.
    Guo J.
    Liu X.
    Wang N.
    Hangkong Dongli Xuebao/Journal of Aerospace Power, 2020, 35 (11): : 2421 - 2428
  • [44] Uncertainty of measurements of podded propulsor performance characteristics
    Islam, Mohammed
    Veitch, Brian
    Liu, Pengfei
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2014, 81 : 130 - 138
  • [45] Metrics for evaluating performance and uncertainty of Bayesian network models
    Marcot, Bruce G.
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2012, 230 : 50 - 62
  • [46] Evaluating Prognostics Performance for Algorithms Incorporating Uncertainty Estimates
    Saxena, Abhinav
    Celaya, Jose
    Saha, Bhaskar
    Saha, Sankalita
    Goebel, Kai
    2010 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2010,
  • [47] Evaluating airline's service quality performance in uncertainty
    Lin, Ru-Jen
    Tseng, Ming-Lang
    Chen, Yuan-Ho
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2011, 5 (11): : 4609 - 4621
  • [48] Uncertainty of flow velocity measurements due to refractive index fluctuations
    Schluessler, Raimund
    Czarske, Juergen
    Fischer, Andreas
    OPTICS AND LASERS IN ENGINEERING, 2014, 54 : 93 - 104
  • [49] A Framework for Evaluating Business Process Performance
    Khlif, Wiem
    Kchaou, Mariem
    Gargouri, Faiez
    ICSOFT: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES, 2019, : 371 - 383
  • [50] THE PROCESS OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATING OF THE COMPANY
    Jackova, Anna
    AD ALTA-JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH, 2020, 10 (02): : 161 - 164