Perception Versus Reality in the Cost of Orthopedic Trauma Implants

被引:10
|
作者
Ayoub, Mark [1 ]
Bassett, William Paul [2 ]
Seuffert, Patricia [3 ]
Matijakovich, Douglas [4 ]
O'Hara, Dorene A. [4 ]
Butler, Mark S. [3 ]
机构
[1] UCSF Fresno, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 2823 Fresno St, Fresno, CA 93721 USA
[2] Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Univ Hosp, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[3] Univ Orthopaed Associates, Somerset, NJ USA
[4] Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, New Brunswick, NJ USA
关键词
trauma surgery implant cost; medical cost containment; resident education; systems-based practice;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.02.015
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Health care costs are increasing in medicine and in orthopedics. Device choice in orthopedic cases can impact the cost of the procedure and thus result in cost savings. This study aims to determine whether orthopedic attendings and residents accurately estimate device costs they are implanting in trauma cases and whether costs would influence their surgical device selection. DESIGN: Using nationally published average cost data for 13 implants, a survey was distributed at 6 US academic centers. Respondents were asked to select the correct cost from cost ranges. They also answered yes/no questions about their choices regarding published research outcomes for specific fractures. Residents' answers were compared with faculty answers using t tests for each cost estimate question, and chi-square tests for yes/no questions and frequencies. RESULTS: A total of 51 faculty members and 76 residents responded. Attending estimates were closer to the actual cost for most devices. The average total error in cost estimate for all 13 implants was $11,288.36 for residents (35.6% difference) and $10,208.33 for faculty members (32.2% difference). Significantly more faculty members estimated costs within 10% versus residents. When asked if the literature showed differences in outcome when using different implants to treat 4 common fractures, most answered these questions correctly. Further, 71.1% of residents said their choice of implant would change if costs affected physician reimbursements versus 58% for faculty members. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate orthopedic physicians are not aware of true implant costs and nearly half of attendings would not consider cost as a factor in deciding between equivalent implants, even if this affected their reimbursement. Most notably, participants showed a poor ability to closely estimate the cost of more expensive implants (actual device cost greater than $2000). Our results suggest that medical cost containment should be stressed to the next generation of surgeons. (C) 2018 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1333 / 1341
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Reality of Trauma; the Trauma of Reality
    Bako, Tihamer
    Zana, Katalin
    PSYCHOANALYTIC DIALOGUES, 2023, 33 (03) : 302 - 319
  • [42] Generic orthopaedic trauma implants: implementation, outcomes, and cost savings
    Kleinsmith, Rebekah M.
    Doxey, Stephen A.
    Huyke-Hernandez, Fernando A.
    Mikhael, Nizar
    Cunningham, Brian P.
    CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE, 2024, 35 (01): : 38 - 42
  • [43] Invited Commentary for "Trauma Leadership: Does Perception Drive Reality?"
    Cogbill, Thomas H.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2012, 69 (02) : 241 - 241
  • [44] Perception does not equal reality for resident vascular trauma skills
    Bowyer, Mark W.
    Shackelford, Stacy A.
    Garofalo, Evan
    Pugh, Kristy
    Mackenzie, Colin F.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2015, 198 (02) : 280 - 288
  • [45] Biomaterials as Implants in the Orthopedic Field for Regenerative Medicine: Metal versus Synthetic Polymers
    Al-Shalawi, Faisal Dakhelallah
    Ariff, Azmah Hanim Mohamed
    Jung, Dong-Won
    Ariffin, Mohd Khairol Anuar Mohd
    Kim, Collin Looi Seng
    Brabazon, Dermot
    Al-Osaimi, Maha Obaid
    POLYMERS, 2023, 15 (12)
  • [46] Minimum and comfortable driving headways: Reality versus perception
    Taieb-Maimon, M
    Shinar, D
    HUMAN FACTORS, 2001, 43 (01) : 159 - 172
  • [47] Oral contraceptive health benefits: Perception versus reality
    Kaunitz, AM
    CONTRACEPTION, 1999, 59 (01) : 29S - 33S
  • [48] SUPPORTING AUTONOMY IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION: PERCEPTION VERSUS REALITY
    Aguado-Gomez, R. L.
    Diaz-Cueto, M.
    Hernandez-Alvarez, J. L.
    Lopez-Rodriguez, A.
    REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE MEDICINA Y CIENCIAS DE LA ACTIVIDAD FISICA Y DEL DEPORTE, 2016, 16 (62): : 183 - 202
  • [49] Perception versus reality for indices of health in UK men
    DeVille-Almond, J.
    Potter, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY, 2008, 32 : S198 - S198
  • [50] Comparison of perception versus reality in timber bridge performance
    Smith, RL
    Stanfill-McMillan, K
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1998, 10 (04) : 238 - 243