Comparison of Process-Based and Temperature-Index Snowmelt Modeling in SWAT

被引:118
|
作者
Debele, Bekele [1 ]
Srinivasan, Raghavan [2 ]
Gosain, A. K. [3 ]
机构
[1] World Bank, Sustainable Dev Dept Middle E&N Africa Reg, Washington, DC 20043 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Spatial Sci Lab, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, New Delhi 110016, India
关键词
Snow cover; Snowmelt; Solar radiation; SWAT; Temperature index; ENERGY-BALANCE; SOLAR-RADIATION; SURFACE; CLIMATE; FOREST; COVER; SIMULATION; REGION;
D O I
10.1007/s11269-009-9486-2
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Snowmelt hydrology is an important part of hydrological analyses where significant proportion of precipitation is expected to fall in a snow form. Many models have long been introduced to enable the simulation of snowmelt processes in the watershed ranging from simple temperature based equations to complex and sophisticated process-based equations. Usually, mixed results have been reported whether or not the difference between results achieved by incorporating data demanding models vis-A -vis simple temperature-index models is justifiable. In this study, we compared the performances of physically based energy budget and simpler temperature-index based snowmelt calculation approaches within the SWAT model at three sites in two different continents. The results indicate insignificant differences between the two approaches. The temperature-index based snowmelt computation method had the overall model efficiency coefficients ranging from 0.49 to 0.73 while the energy budget based approach had efficiency coefficients ranging from 0.33 to 0.59 only. The magnitude of the differences varied based on where the models were applied. However, comparison between two process-based snowmelt estimation procedures (with and without the inclusion of aspect and slope as factors dictating the incoming solar energy) indicate that accounting for ground surface slope and aspect in the snowmelt model slightly improved the results. We conclude that for most practical applications where net solar radiation, not turbulent heat flux, dominates the snowmelt dynamics, a simpler temperature-index snowmelt estimation model is sufficient.
引用
收藏
页码:1065 / 1088
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Towards Process-based Range Modeling of Many Species
    Evans, Margaret E. K.
    Merow, Cory
    Record, Sydne
    McMahon, Sean M.
    Enquist, Brian J.
    TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2016, 31 (11) : 860 - 871
  • [32] A blueprint for process-based modeling of uncertain hydrological systems
    Montanari, Alberto
    Koutsoyiannis, Demetris
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2012, 48
  • [33] Modeling and Managing Variability in Process-Based Service Compositions
    Tuan Nguyen
    Colman, Alan
    Han, Jun
    SERVICE-ORIENTED COMPUTING, 2011, 7084 : 404 - 420
  • [34] Process-based modeling of morphodynamics of a tidal inlet system
    Xie Dongfeng
    Gao Shu
    Pan Cunhong
    ACTA OCEANOLOGICA SINICA, 2010, 29 (06) : 51 - 61
  • [35] Ecological Modeling of the Supraglacial Ecosystem: A Process-based Perspective
    Stibal, Marek
    Bradley, James A.
    Box, Jason E.
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2017, 5
  • [36] Process-based modeling of tsunami inundation and sediment transport
    Apotsos, Alex
    Gelfenbaum, Guy
    Jaffe, Bruce
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-EARTH SURFACE, 2011, 116
  • [37] Evaluating ephemeral gullies with a process-based topographic index model
    Daggupati, Prasad
    Sheshukov, Aleksey Y.
    Douglas-Mankin, Kyle R.
    CATENA, 2014, 113 : 177 - 186
  • [38] Temperature integration and process-based humidity control in chrysanthemum
    Körner, O
    Challa, H
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2004, 43 (01) : 1 - 21
  • [39] Process-based evaluation and comparison of OTS software alternatives
    Faundes, Maria Jesus
    Astudillo, Hernan
    Hitpass, Bernhard
    2013 FEDERATED CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS (FEDCSIS), 2013, : 1093 - 1100
  • [40] A process-based framework for validating forest landscape modeling outcomes
    Wu, Mia M.
    Liang, Yu
    He, Hong S.
    Yang, Jian
    Liu, Bo
    Ma, Tianxiao
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2025, 185