Sectoral variation in collectively agreed employment protection: Evidence from Dutch flexicurity

被引:9
|
作者
Schils, Trudie [1 ]
Houwing, Hester [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maastricht, Dept Econ, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Sociaal Econ Raad, Directie Sociale Zaken, NL-2509 LK The Hague, Netherlands
关键词
collective bargaining; employment protection; flexicurity; varieties of capitalism; INDUSTRIAL-RELATIONS; COUNTRIES;
D O I
10.1177/0959680110364828
中图分类号
F24 [劳动经济];
学科分类号
020106 ; 020207 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This article addresses the flexicurity outcomes of sectoral collective bargaining in the Netherlands. Dutch experience - presented as a model by the European Commission - proves not to be a case of 'one size fits all'. Taking an institutionalist but firm-centred perspective, our analysis links the flexicurity policy debate to the theoretical analyses of 'Varieties of Capitalism' (VoC), which also stress various institutional constellations that can lead to equally optimal outcomes. In contrast to the core argument of the VoC perspective that diversity between institutional regimes is persistent, we find convergence across sectors over time. However, sectoral differences in the negotiated flexicurity balance remain apparent.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 152
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The impact of cost stickiness on income smoothing: evidence from employment protection regulations
    Filip, Andrei
    Liu, Junqi
    Lui, Daphne
    ACCOUNTING AND BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2025, 55 (01) : 1 - 38
  • [32] Preferences for Employment Protection and the Insider-Outsider Divide: Evidence from France
    Guillaud, Elvire
    Marx, Paul
    WEST EUROPEAN POLITICS, 2014, 37 (05) : 1177 - 1185
  • [33] Employment protection and the cost of equity capital: Evidence from wrongful discharge laws
    Li, Tongxia
    Lu, Chun
    Si, Ieong Cheng
    Zhao, Zucheng
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 47
  • [34] Employment Protection and Banking Power: Evidence from Adoption of Wrongful Discharge Laws
    Yin, Desheng
    Zhen, Xinting
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (04) : 1 - 22
  • [35] EMPLOYMENT PROTECTION LEGISLATION, CAPITAL INVESTMENT AND ACCESS TO CREDIT: EVIDENCE FROM ITALY
    Cingano, Federico
    Leonardi, Marco
    Messina, Julian
    Pica, Giovanni
    ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2016, 126 (595): : 1798 - 1822
  • [36] Does Religion Matter to Employment Protection? Evidence from Chinese Private Firms
    Hafedh, Mohammed
    Xu, Xixiong
    JOURNAL OF RELIGION & HEALTH, 2022, 61 (04): : 2770 - 2787
  • [37] Does Religion Matter to Employment Protection? Evidence from Chinese Private Firms
    Mohammed Hafedh
    Xixiong Xu
    Journal of Religion and Health, 2022, 61 : 2770 - 2787
  • [38] Does employment protection help immigrants? Evidence from European labor markets
    Sa, Filipa
    LABOUR ECONOMICS, 2011, 18 (05) : 624 - 642
  • [39] Sectoral adjustment of employment to shifts in outsourcing and trade: Evidence from a dynamic fixed effects multinomial logit model
    Egger, Peter
    Pfaffermayr, Michael
    Weber, Andrea
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 2007, 22 (03) : 559 - 580
  • [40] Effects of employment protection on worker and job flows: Evidence from the 1990 Italian reform
    Kugler, Adriana
    Pica, Giovanni
    LABOUR ECONOMICS, 2008, 15 (01) : 78 - 95