Comparative analysis of soil-sampling methods used in precision agriculture

被引:6
|
作者
Ribeiro Goncalves, Jose Roberto Moreira [1 ]
Silva Ferraz, Gabriel Araujo E. [2 ]
Reynaldo, Etore Francisco [3 ]
Marin, Diego Bedin [2 ]
Ponciano Ferraz, Patricia Ferreira [2 ]
Perez-Ruiz, Manuel [4 ]
Rossi, Giuseppe [5 ]
Vieri, Marco [6 ]
Sarri, Daniele [6 ]
机构
[1] Laureate Int IBMR, Dept Architecture & Engn, Barra Da Tijuca, RJ, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Lavras, Dept Agr Engn, Univ Campus, Lavras, MG, Brazil
[3] Syngenta, Uberlandia, MG, Brazil
[4] Univ Seville, Area Agroforestry Engn, Tech Sch Agr Engn ETSIA, Seville, Spain
[5] Univ Florence, Dept Agr Food Environm & Forestry, Florence, Italy
[6] Univ Florence, Biosyst Engn Div, Dept Agr Food Environm & Forestry DAGRI, Piazzale Cascine 15, I-50144 Florence, Italy
关键词
Management zones; grid sampling; environmental impact; electrical conductivity; soil proximity sensor; SPATIAL VARIABILITY; MANAGEMENT; PHOSPHORUS; ADOPTION; SIZE; CROP;
D O I
10.4081/jae.2021.1117
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to compare three different soil-sampling methods used in Precision Agriculture and their environmental impact on agricultural production. The sampling methods used were: zone management by elevation, grid sampling (GS) and sampling oriented by apparent soil electrical conductivity (OS). Three different fields were tested. When the recommendations were compared, a significant difference among the suggested doses was observed. This indicated the need to improve the soilsampling techniques, since there were doubts about input deficits or overdoses, regardless of the technology studied. The GS method was the most environmentally viable alternative for phosphorus (P) compared to other methods and the OS presented as the better option for potassium (K) and nitrogen (N). However, the use of soil sensors appeared to be a viable technology that needs further improvement in order to improve productivity and, hence, economic and environmental benefits.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Methods of soil sampling for microplastic analysis: a review
    Rogers Wainkwa Chia
    Jin-Yong Lee
    Jihye Cha
    Andrés Rodríguez-Seijo
    Environmental Chemistry Letters, 2024, 22 : 227 - 238
  • [32] Comparison of Sampling Methods Used to Evaluate Forest Soil Bulk Density
    Solgi, Ahmad
    Naghdi, Ramin
    Labelle, Eric R.
    Tsioras, Petros A.
    Salehi, Ali
    CROATIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST ENGINEERING, 2018, 39 (02) : 247 - 254
  • [33] COMPARATIVE SOIL ANALYSIS AS USED IN CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION
    SCHILLER, WR
    ROHM, E
    KRIMINALISTIK, 1977, 31 (10): : 439 - 443
  • [34] THE USE OF PRECISION AGRICULTURE IN SOIL MANAGEMENT
    Godwin, Richard J.
    TRENDS IN AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING 2010, 2010, : 7 - 13
  • [35] Soil macronutrient sensing for precision agriculture
    Kim, Hak-Jin
    Sudduth, Kenneth A.
    Hummel, John W.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING, 2009, 11 (10): : 1810 - 1824
  • [36] An Overview of Precision Irrigation Systems Used in Agriculture
    Plascak, Ivan
    Jurisi, Mladen
    Radocaj, Dorijan
    Vujic, Milan
    Zimmer, Domagoj
    TEHNICKI GLASNIK-TECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 15 (04): : 546 - 553
  • [37] Geostatistical Analysis of the Soil and Crop Parameters in a Field Experiment on Precision Agriculture
    Sidorova, V. A.
    Zhukovskii, E. E.
    Lekomtsev, P. V.
    Yakushev, V. V.
    EURASIAN SOIL SCIENCE, 2012, 45 (08) : 783 - 792
  • [38] Geostatistical analysis of the soil and crop parameters in a field experiment on precision agriculture
    V. A. Sidorova
    E. E. Zhukovskii
    P. V. Lekomtsev
    V. V. Yakushev
    Eurasian Soil Science, 2012, 45 : 783 - 792
  • [39] NEW APPROACHES FOR ANALYSIS METHODS OF THE INPUTS USED IN ECOLOGICAL AGRICULTURE
    Madjar, Roxana Maria
    Vasile, Gina Scaeteanu
    Badulescu, Liliana
    SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES A-AGRONOMY, 2020, 63 (01): : 696 - 702
  • [40] Methodologies Used in Remote Sensing Data Analysis and Remote Sensors for Precision Agriculture
    Fuentes, Sigfredo
    Chang, Jiyul
    SENSORS, 2022, 22 (20)