Comparative analysis of soil-sampling methods used in precision agriculture

被引:6
|
作者
Ribeiro Goncalves, Jose Roberto Moreira [1 ]
Silva Ferraz, Gabriel Araujo E. [2 ]
Reynaldo, Etore Francisco [3 ]
Marin, Diego Bedin [2 ]
Ponciano Ferraz, Patricia Ferreira [2 ]
Perez-Ruiz, Manuel [4 ]
Rossi, Giuseppe [5 ]
Vieri, Marco [6 ]
Sarri, Daniele [6 ]
机构
[1] Laureate Int IBMR, Dept Architecture & Engn, Barra Da Tijuca, RJ, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Lavras, Dept Agr Engn, Univ Campus, Lavras, MG, Brazil
[3] Syngenta, Uberlandia, MG, Brazil
[4] Univ Seville, Area Agroforestry Engn, Tech Sch Agr Engn ETSIA, Seville, Spain
[5] Univ Florence, Dept Agr Food Environm & Forestry, Florence, Italy
[6] Univ Florence, Biosyst Engn Div, Dept Agr Food Environm & Forestry DAGRI, Piazzale Cascine 15, I-50144 Florence, Italy
关键词
Management zones; grid sampling; environmental impact; electrical conductivity; soil proximity sensor; SPATIAL VARIABILITY; MANAGEMENT; PHOSPHORUS; ADOPTION; SIZE; CROP;
D O I
10.4081/jae.2021.1117
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to compare three different soil-sampling methods used in Precision Agriculture and their environmental impact on agricultural production. The sampling methods used were: zone management by elevation, grid sampling (GS) and sampling oriented by apparent soil electrical conductivity (OS). Three different fields were tested. When the recommendations were compared, a significant difference among the suggested doses was observed. This indicated the need to improve the soilsampling techniques, since there were doubts about input deficits or overdoses, regardless of the technology studied. The GS method was the most environmentally viable alternative for phosphorus (P) compared to other methods and the OS presented as the better option for potassium (K) and nitrogen (N). However, the use of soil sensors appeared to be a viable technology that needs further improvement in order to improve productivity and, hence, economic and environmental benefits.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative economic analysis of soil sampling methods used in precision agriculture
    Goncalves, Jose Roberto M. R.
    Ferraz, Gabriel A. S.
    Reynaldo, Etore F.
    Marin, Diego B.
    Ferraz, Patricia F. P.
    ANAIS DA ACADEMIA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIAS, 2020, 92 : 1 - 16
  • [2] Soil-sampling issues for precision management of crop production
    Rains, GC
    Thomas, DL
    Vellidis, G
    APPLIED ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE, 2001, 17 (06) : 769 - 775
  • [3] An improved soil-sampling tube
    Veihmeyer, FJ
    SOIL SCIENCE, 1929, 27 (02) : 147 - 152
  • [4] MAST ANCHOR FOR HYDRAULIC SOIL-SAMPLING MACHINES
    MIELKE, LN
    WILHELM, WW
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1983, 47 (06) : 1263 - 1264
  • [5] A comparison of EMI and DC methods used in soil mapping - theoretical considerations for precision agriculture
    Dabasl, M
    Tabbaghz, A
    PRECISION AGRICULTURE, 2003, : 121 - 127
  • [6] A new jack for pulling soil-sampling tubes
    Stoeckeler, JH
    SOIL SCIENCE, 1937, 43 (05) : 379 - 383
  • [7] Soil sampling with drones and augmented reality in precision agriculture
    Huuskonen, Janna
    Oksanen, Timo
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2018, 154 : 25 - 35
  • [8] EVALUATION OF NEMATODE RECOVERY RATES IN A SOIL-SAMPLING MODEL
    FELDMESS.JJ
    MCGUIRE, JU
    FRIEDMAN, W
    JOURNAL OF NEMATOLOGY, 1974, 6 (04) : 139 - 140
  • [9] Comparison of Kriging Interpolation Precision With Different Soil Sampling Intervals for Precision Agriculture
    Liu Guo-Shun
    Jiang Hou-Long
    Liu Shu-Duan
    Wang Xin-Zhong
    Shi Hong-Zhi
    Yang Yong-Feng
    Yang Xia-Meng
    Hu Hong-Chao
    Liu Qing-Hua
    Gu Jian-Guo
    SOIL SCIENCE, 2010, 175 (08) : 405 - 415
  • [10] Optimizing soil analysis in precision agriculture: Evaluating alternative methods for SOC prediction
    Bowen, Jose Lizardo Reyna
    Montenegro, Lenin Vera
    Moreira, Maria Isabel Delgado
    JOURNAL OF ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2025, 26 (01): : 322 - 331