Correlation of computed tomography and positron emission tomography in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated at a single institution with imatinib mesylate: Proposal of new computed tomography response criteria

被引:1184
|
作者
Choi, Haesun
Charnsangavej, Chuslip
Faria, Silvana C.
Macapinlac, Homer A.
Burgess, Michael A.
Patel, Shreyaskumar R.
Chen, Lei L.
Podoloff, Donald A.
Benjamin, Robert S.
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Div Diagnost Imaging, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Sarcoma Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ San Diego, Dept Radiol, San Diego, CA 92110 USA
[4] Univ Utah, Dept Internal Med, Huntsman Canc Inst, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2006.07.3049
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) are insensitive in evaluating gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) treated with imatinib. This study evaluates whether computed tomography (CT) findings of GIST after imatinib treatment correlate with tumor responses by [(18)F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography ( PET) and develops reliable, quantitative, CT response criteria. Patients and Methods A total of 172 lesions selected by RECIST were evaluated in 40 patients with metastatic GISTs treated with imatinib. All patients had pretreatment and 2-month follow-up CTs and FDG-PETs. Multivariate analysis was performed using tumor size and density (Hounsfield unit [HU]) on CT and maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) on FDG-PET. Patients were observed up to 28 months. Results Mean baseline tumor size and density on CT were 5.3 cm and 72.8 HU, respectively, and mean baseline SUV(max) on FDG-PET was 5.8. Thirty-three patients had good response on FDG-PET. A decrease in tumor size of more than 10% or a decrease in tumor density of more than 15% on CT had a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 100% in identifying PET responders versus 52% and 100% by RECIST. Good responders on CT at 2 months had significantly longer time to progression than those who did not respond ( P =.01). Conclusion Small changes in tumor size or density on CT are sensitive and specific methods of assessing the response of GISTs. If the prognostic value of our proposed CT response criteria can be confirmed prospectively, the criteria should be employed in future studies of patients with GIST.
引用
收藏
页码:1753 / 1759
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Discordant Primary Resistance to Imatinib Mesylate in the Same Individual and Splenic Involvement in Recurring Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Assessment by Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography
    Fargose, Preeti
    Basu, Sandip
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2018, 33 (02): : 140 - 142
  • [22] Treatment response monitoring in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor using diffusion-weighted imaging: preliminary results in comparison with positron emission tomography/computed tomography
    Gong, Nan-Jie
    Wong, Chun-Sing
    Chu, Yiu-Ching
    Gu, Jing
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2013, 26 (02) : 185 - 192
  • [23] Positron emission tomography and single photon emission computed tomography in epilepsy care
    Henry, TR
    Van Heerturn, RL
    SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2003, 33 (02) : 88 - 104
  • [24] Gastrointestinal stromal tumor -: Correlation of computed tomography findings with tumor grade and mortality
    Tateishi, U
    Hasegawa, T
    Satake, M
    Moriyama, N
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2003, 27 (05) : 792 - 798
  • [25] [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and positron emission tomography: Computed tomography in recurrent and metastatic cholangiocarcinoma
    Jadvar, Hossein
    Henderson, Robert W.
    Conti, Peter S.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2007, 31 (02) : 223 - 228
  • [26] A Systematic Review On Response Evaluation With Positron Emission Tomography / Computed Tomography
    Ehlers, K.
    Gerke, O.
    Motschall, E.
    Hoilund-Carlsen, P. F.
    Vach, W.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2018, 45 : S446 - S446
  • [27] Therapy Response Evaluation with Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography
    Segall, George M.
    SEMINARS IN ULTRASOUND CT AND MRI, 2010, 31 (06) : 490 - 495
  • [28] 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography as a prognostic marker of imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors
    Kawabata, Kota
    Takahashi, Tsuyoshi
    Nishida, Toshirou
    Kurokawa, Yukinori
    Yamamoto, Kazuyoshi
    Saito, Takuro
    Momose, Kota
    Yamashita, Kotaro
    Tanaka, Koji
    Makino, Tomoki
    Kawabata, Ryohei
    Takeno, Atsushi
    Nakajima, Kiyokazu
    Eguchi, Hidetoshi
    Doki, Yuichiro
    SURGERY TODAY, 2025,
  • [29] The Value of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Evaluating Metastatic Disease in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer
    Kim, Mi-Jin
    Lee, Kwang Hyuck
    Lee, Kyu Taek
    Lee, Jong Kyun
    Ku, Bon-Ho
    Oh, Cho-Rong
    Heo, Jin Seok
    Choi, Seong-Ho
    Choi, Dong Wook
    PANCREAS, 2012, 41 (06) : 897 - 903
  • [30] Fetal Dose Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography in Pregnant Patients
    Burton, C.
    Fahey, F.
    Shulkin, B.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E287 - E288