A multi-fidelity information-fusion approach to machine learn and predict polymer bandgap

被引:65
|
作者
Patra, Abhirup [1 ]
Batra, Rohit [1 ]
Chandrasekaran, Anand [1 ]
Kim, Chiho [1 ]
Tran Doan Huan [1 ]
Ramprasad, Rampi [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Mat Sci & Engn, 771 Ferst Dr NW, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
关键词
Density functional theory; Machine learning; Multi-fidelity learning; Polymers; Bandgap; APPROXIMATION; POTENTIALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.109286
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The fidelity of data is of paramount importance in the construction of reliable and accurate machine learning (ML) models. Low-fidelity data, although noisy, can usually be obtained for a large number of material samples. High-fidelity data, on the other hand, is time-consuming and oftentimes, only available for a limited number of target samples. While the former can provide useful information to help generalize the ML models over large materials space, the latter is useful to build more accurate surrogate models. Information fusion schemes that utilize the data available at multiple levels of fidelity can outperform traditional single fidelity based ML methods, such as Gaussian process regression. In this work, a variant of the multi-fidelity information fusion scheme, namely multi-fidelity co-kriging, is used to build powerful prediction models of polymer bandgaps. To benchmark this strategy, we utilize a bandgap dataset of 382 polymers, obtained at two levels of fidelity: using the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) exchange-correlational functional ("low-fidelity") and the Heyd-Scuseria-Ernzerhof (HSE06) functional("high-fidelity") of density functional theory. The multi-fidelity model, trained on both PBE and HSE06 data, outperforms a single-fidelity Gaussian process regression model trained on just HSE06 band-gaps in a number of scenarios and is also able to generalize better to a more diverse chemical space.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multi-fidelity approach for transitional boundary layer
    Kima, Minwoo
    Lima, Jiseop
    Jee, Solkeun
    Park, Donghun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND FLUID FLOW, 2023, 102
  • [22] Multi-fidelity approach for sonic boom annoyance
    Graziani, Samuele
    Viola, Nicole
    Fusaro, Roberta
    AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, IV AEROSPACE PHD-DAYS 2024, 2024, 42 : 126 - 131
  • [23] Multi-fidelity neural optimization machine for Digital Twins
    Jie Chen
    Changyu Meng
    Yi Gao
    Yongming Liu
    Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2022, 65
  • [24] A review on multi-fidelity hyperparameter optimization in machine learning
    Won, Jonghyeon
    Lee, Hyun-Suk
    Lee, Jang-Won
    ICT EXPRESS, 2025, 11 (02): : 245 - 257
  • [25] A simple denoising approach to exploit multi-fidelity data for machine learning materials properties
    Xiaotong Liu
    Pierre-Paul De Breuck
    Linghui Wang
    Gian-Marco Rignanese
    npj Computational Materials, 8
  • [26] Multi-fidelity Gaussian process modeling with boundary information
    Ye, Wenxing
    Tan, Matthias Hwai Yong
    APPLIED STOCHASTIC MODELS IN BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY, 2022, 38 (02) : 216 - 239
  • [27] Multi-Fidelity Information Fusion to Model the Position-Dependent Modal Properties of Milling Robots
    Busch, Maximilian
    Zaeh, Michael E.
    ROBOTICS, 2022, 11 (01)
  • [28] A resilient and efficient CFD framework: Statistical learning tools for multi-fidelity and heterogeneous information fusion
    Lee, Seungjoon
    Kevrekidis, Ioannis G.
    Karniadakis, George Em
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2017, 344 : 516 - 533
  • [29] A simple denoising approach to exploit multi-fidelity data for machine learning materials properties
    Liu, Xiaotong
    De Breuck, Pierre-Paul
    Wang, Linghui
    Rignanese, Gian-Marco
    NPJ COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS, 2022, 8 (01)
  • [30] A combined modeling method for complex multi-fidelity data fusion
    Tang, Lei
    Liu, Feng
    Wu, Anping
    Li, Yubo
    Jiang, Wanqiu
    Wang, Qingfeng
    Huang, Jun
    MACHINE LEARNING-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 5 (03):