A multi-fidelity information-fusion approach to machine learn and predict polymer bandgap

被引:65
|
作者
Patra, Abhirup [1 ]
Batra, Rohit [1 ]
Chandrasekaran, Anand [1 ]
Kim, Chiho [1 ]
Tran Doan Huan [1 ]
Ramprasad, Rampi [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Mat Sci & Engn, 771 Ferst Dr NW, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
关键词
Density functional theory; Machine learning; Multi-fidelity learning; Polymers; Bandgap; APPROXIMATION; POTENTIALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.109286
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The fidelity of data is of paramount importance in the construction of reliable and accurate machine learning (ML) models. Low-fidelity data, although noisy, can usually be obtained for a large number of material samples. High-fidelity data, on the other hand, is time-consuming and oftentimes, only available for a limited number of target samples. While the former can provide useful information to help generalize the ML models over large materials space, the latter is useful to build more accurate surrogate models. Information fusion schemes that utilize the data available at multiple levels of fidelity can outperform traditional single fidelity based ML methods, such as Gaussian process regression. In this work, a variant of the multi-fidelity information fusion scheme, namely multi-fidelity co-kriging, is used to build powerful prediction models of polymer bandgaps. To benchmark this strategy, we utilize a bandgap dataset of 382 polymers, obtained at two levels of fidelity: using the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) exchange-correlational functional ("low-fidelity") and the Heyd-Scuseria-Ernzerhof (HSE06) functional("high-fidelity") of density functional theory. The multi-fidelity model, trained on both PBE and HSE06 data, outperforms a single-fidelity Gaussian process regression model trained on just HSE06 band-gaps in a number of scenarios and is also able to generalize better to a more diverse chemical space.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-fidelity information fusion based on prediction of kriging
    Dong, Huachao
    Song, Baowei
    Wang, Peng
    Huang, Shuai
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2015, 51 (06) : 1267 - 1280
  • [2] Multi-fidelity information fusion with concatenated neural networks
    Pawar, Suraj
    San, Omer
    Vedula, Prakash
    Rasheed, Adil
    Kvamsdal, Trond
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [3] Multi-fidelity information fusion based on prediction of kriging
    Huachao Dong
    Baowei Song
    Peng Wang
    Shuai Huang
    Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2015, 51 : 1267 - 1280
  • [4] Multi-fidelity information fusion with concatenated neural networks
    Suraj Pawar
    Omer San
    Prakash Vedula
    Adil Rasheed
    Trond Kvamsdal
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [5] Multi-fidelity machine learning models for accurate bandgap predictions of solids
    Pilania, G.
    Gubernatis, J. E.
    Lookman, T.
    COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2017, 129 : 156 - 163
  • [6] Multi-fidelity information fusion for turbulent transport modeling in magnetic fusion plasma
    Maeyama, Shinya
    Honda, Mitsuru
    Narita, Emi
    Toda, Shinichiro
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [7] A multi-fidelity machine learning framework to predict wind loads on buildings
    Lamberti, Giacomo
    Gorle, Catherine
    JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2021, 214
  • [8] A multi-fidelity machine learning framework to predict wind loads on buildings
    Lamberti, Giacomo
    Gorlé, Catherine
    Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2021, 214
  • [9] Multi-fidelity information fusion with hierarchical surrogate guided by feature mapping
    Wang, Yitang
    Li, Kunpeng
    Li, Qingye
    Pang, Yong
    Lv, Liye
    Sun, Wei
    Song, Xueguan
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2023, 275
  • [10] A multi-fidelity information fusion metamodeling assisted laser beam welding process parameter optimization approach
    Zhou, Qi
    Yang, Yang
    Jiang, Ping
    Shao, Xinyu
    Cao, Longchao
    Hu, Jiexiang
    Gao, Zhongmei
    Wang, Chaochao
    ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE, 2017, 110 : 85 - 97