Biochemical relapse following radical prostatectomy according to margin status and Gleason score

被引：0
|
作者：
Lattouf, JB
Saad, F
机构：
来源：
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2003年 / 169卷 / 04期
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学（泌尿生殖系疾病）];
学科分类号：
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要：
1675
引用
收藏
页码：447 / 447
页数：1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] CAN THE GLEASON GRADE AT THE SITE OF A POSITIVE MARGIN PREDICT BIOCHEMICAL FAILURE POST RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY?
    Savdie, Richard
    Benito, Ruth A. Pe
    Haynes, Anne-Maree
    Stricker, Phillip D.
    Henshall, Susan M.
    Sutherland, Robert L.
    Turner, Jennifer J.
    Delprado, Warick
    Horvath, Lisa G.
    Rasiah, Krishan K.
    Kench, James G.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (04): : E119 - E119
  • [32] Validation of a Gleason Score 7 Weighted Based on Proportion of Gleason 4 Component (Quantitative Gleason Score) as Predictor of Biochemical Recurrencee after Radical Prostatectomy
    Deng, F-M
    Benito, R. Pe
    Donin, N.
    Rosenkrantz, A.
    Zhou, M.
    Lepor, H.
    Taneja, S.
    Melamed, J.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2013, 93 : 205A - 205A
  • [33] Impact of surgical margin length, number and gleason on biochemical recurrence for men undergoing radical prostatectomy
    Carver, B. S.
    Romero Otero, J.
    Kuroiwa, K.
    Serio, A.
    Scardino, P. T.
    Eastham, J. A.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2007, 6 (02) : 153 - 153
  • [34] Validation of a Gleason Score 7 Weighted Based on Proportion of Gleason 4 Component (Quantitative Gleason Score) as Predictor of Biochemical Recurrencee after Radical Prostatectomy
    Deng, F-M
    Benito, R. Pe
    Donin, N.
    Rosenkrantz, A.
    Zhou, M.
    Lepor, H.
    Taneja, S.
    Melamed, J.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2013, 26 : 205A - 205A
  • [35] Does Gleason score of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy affect biochemical recurrence and oncological outcomes? Protocol for systematic review
    John, Athul
    O'Callaghan, Michael
    Catterwell, Rick
    Selth, Luke A.
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (03):
  • [36] Prognostic Significance of Surgical Margin Status and Gleason Grade at the Positive Surgical Margin in Predicting Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy in a Turkish Patient Cohort
    Koparal, Murat Yavuz
    Sozen, Tevfik Sinan
    Aslan, Guven
    Baltaci, Sumer
    Suer, Evren
    Muezzinoglu, Talha
    Akdogan, Bulent
    Turkeri, Levent
    UROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY, 2021, 20 (01): : 26 - 39
  • [37] Impact of discordance between clinical and pathological gleason score on survival following radical prostatectomy
    Boorjian, Stephen A.
    Crispen, Paul L.
    Rangel, Laureano J.
    Bergstralh, Eric J.
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Blute, Michael L.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04): : 53 - 53
  • [38] SIZE-ADJUSTED QUANTITATIVE GLEASON SCORE AS A PREDICTOR OF BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Donin, Nicholas
    Deng, Fang-Ming
    Benito, Ruth Pe
    Wang, Jinhua
    Melamed, Jonathan
    Zhou, Ming
    Lepor, Herbert
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E681 - E681
  • [39] Pathological and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy for men with a biopsy Gleason score of 8 to 10
    Bastian, PJ
    Gonzalgo, ML
    Mangold, LA
    Aronson, WJ
    Terris, MK
    Kane, CJ
    Amling, CL
    Presti, JC
    Epstein, JI
    Partin, AW
    Freedland, SJ
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (04): : 215 - 215
  • [40] Gleason score 6 prostate cancer involving ≤5% of the needle biopsy does not predict biochemical progression, final pathologic stage, grade, or margin status in radical prostatectomy specimen
    Dora, CD
    Sebo, TJ
    Slezak, JM
    Bergstralh, EJ
    Blute, ML
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (04): : 223 - 223
12345