Improving Soil Nutrition with Poultry Litter Application in Low-Input Forage Systems

被引:29
|
作者
McGrath, Steve [1 ]
Maguire, Rory O. [1 ]
Tracy, Benjamin F. [2 ]
Fike, John H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Tech, Crop & Soil Environm Sci, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[2] VPI, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
关键词
PERENNIAL GRASSES; PHOSPHORUS LOSS; SANDY SOILS; PHOSPHATE; RUNOFF; YIELD; WATER; GRASSLAND; NITROGEN; USA;
D O I
10.2134/agronj2009.0198
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Despite high volumes of manure production in the Shenandoah Valley of Virginia, there are still areas of forage production that are nutrient deficient because manures have traditionally been applied to higher-value row crops. This study was conducted to compare the effects of poultry litter and inorganic fertilizers on soil fertility and forage production. Two sites had the same treatments applied for two consecutive years: (1) split application of litter (half in spring and half in summer); (2) inorganic fertilizer at the same N, P, and K rates as Treatment 1; (3) single spring application of litter; (4) inorganic fertilizer at the same N, P, and K rates as Treatment 3; and (5) unfertilized control. Forage yield, soil pH, Mehlich 1 phosphorus (M1P), P uptake, and water-soluble phosphorus (WSP) were measured during this experiment. On average, soil pH was 0.2 higher for litter than inorganic fertilizer treatments, but this difference wasn't significant. The M1P and WSP both increased throughout the 2 yr, but no significant differences were found among split and single application or litter and inorganic fertilizers. Fertilization increased yield 3.5 Mg ha(-1) on average, and application timing and fertilizer types produced similar yields. The P balance revealed that, when using N-based applications, neither site removed adequate P from forage yield to prevent environmental concerns. Our data showed that poultry litter was comparable with inorganic fertilizer in terms of increasing soil WSP, M1P, and forage yield, and the timing of application made no difference.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 54
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A sequential approach for improving AZODYN crop model under conventional and low-input conditions
    David, Christophe
    Jeuffroy, Marie-Helene
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2009, 31 (04) : 177 - 182
  • [32] Evaluation of Forage Production Using Maize-Legume Intercropping and Biofertilizer under Low-Input Conditions
    Javanmard, Abdollah
    Majdi, Mitra
    Hamzepour, Nikoo
    Nasiri, Yousef
    PHILIPPINE AGRICULTURAL SCIENTIST, 2017, 100 (01): : 79 - 87
  • [33] Trees enhance abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, soil structure, and nutrient retention in low-input maize cropping systems
    Dierks, Janina
    Blaser-Hart, Wilma J.
    Gamper, Hannes A.
    Nyoka, Isaac Betserai
    Barrios, Edmundo
    Six, Johan
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 318
  • [34] Spatial variability of soil phosphorous levels before and after poultry litter application
    Sadeghi, Ali
    Graff, Carrie D.
    Starr, Jim
    McCarty, Greg
    Codling, Eton
    Sefton, Kerry
    SOIL SCIENCE, 2006, 171 (11) : 850 - 857
  • [35] Nitrogen and Phosphorus Accumulation in Pasture Soil from Repeated Poultry Litter Application
    He, Zhongqi
    Honeycutt, C. Wayne
    Tazisong, Irenus A.
    Senwo, Zachary N.
    Zhang, Donglin
    COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2009, 40 (1-6) : 587 - 598
  • [36] Corn Response and Soil Nutrient Concentration from Subsurface Application of Poultry Litter
    Simmons, Jason R.
    Sistani, Karamat R.
    Pote, Daniel H.
    Ritchey, Edwin L.
    Jn-Baptiste, Marcia
    Tewolde, Haile
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2016, 108 (04) : 1674 - 1680
  • [37] Leaching of zinc, cadmium, and lead in a sandy soil due to application of poultry litter
    Jalali, M.
    Khanboluki, G.
    SOIL & SEDIMENT CONTAMINATION, 2007, 16 (01): : 47 - 60
  • [38] A Stability Analysis Using AMMΙ and GGE Biplot Approach on Forage Yield Assessment of Common Vetch in Both Conventional and Low-Input Cultivation Systems
    Greveniotis, Vasileios
    Bouloumpasi, Elisavet
    Zotis, Stylianos
    Korkovelos, Athanasios
    Ipsilandis, Constantinos
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2021, 11 (06):
  • [39] Cotton row spacing for boll weevil management in low-input production systems
    Paim, Elcio Antonio
    Dias, Antonio Macedo
    Showler, Allan T.
    Campos, Karolayne Lopes
    Santos Oliveira, Andrea Aparecida
    Castro Grillo, Pedro Paulo
    Bastos, Cristina Schetino
    CROP PROTECTION, 2021, 145
  • [40] Changes in soil chemical properties resulting from organic and low-input farming practices
    Clark, MS
    Horwath, WR
    Shennan, C
    Scow, KM
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1998, 90 (05) : 662 - 671