CHEMICAL CONTROL OF GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT GOOSEGRASS

被引:5
|
作者
Takano, H. K. [1 ]
Oliveira, R. S., Jr. [2 ]
Constantin, J. [2 ]
Silva, V. F. V. [2 ]
Mendes, R. R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] Univ Estadual Maringa, Maringa, Parana, Brazil
关键词
Eleusine indica; residual herbicides; ACCase inhibithors; contact herbicides; application stage; ELEUSINE-INDICA; WEED MANAGEMENT; HERBICIDES; CROPS; GRASS; MALAYSIA; TURF;
D O I
10.1590/S0100-83582018360100055
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The use of mixtures and rotation of herbicide modes of action are essential for herbicide resistance management. The purpose of this research was to evaluate different pm- and post-emergence herbicides to control gooscgrass in soybean and corn. Four greenhouse experiments were conducted, one in preemergence and the three others in post-emergence. In pm-emergence, the number of emerged plants and the control percentage at 20, 35 and 50 days after application were evaluated. In post-emergence, the control percentage was evaluated at 14 and 28 days after application on plants with one tiller and four tillers. The use of residual herbicides to control glyphosate-resistant goosegrass is a very important tool for its effective management. The application stage is also crucial for post-emergence efficacy. Paraquat and [paraquat + diuron] are effective in controlling this species. The application of ACCase inhibiting herbicides alone seems to be more effective than their associations with glyphosate, especially in plants with four tillers. HPPD inhibiting herbicides have high synergism with atrazine and not with glyphosate.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Glyphosate-resistant soybean cultivar response to glyphosate
    Elmore, RW
    Roeth, FW
    Klein, RN
    Knezevic, SZ
    Martin, A
    Nelson, LA
    Shapiro, CA
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2001, 93 (02) : 404 - 407
  • [42] Sustainability and stewardship of glyphosate and glyphosate-resistant crops
    Sammons, R. Douglas
    Heering, David C.
    Dinicola, Natalie
    Glick, Harvey
    Elmore, Greg A.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 21 (02) : 347 - 354
  • [43] Sulfentrazone enhances weed control of glyphosate in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max)
    Krausz, RF
    Young, BG
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 17 (02) : 249 - 255
  • [44] AGRO 43-Disease control activities of glyphosate in glyphosate-resistant crops
    Feng, Paul C. C.
    Caldwell, Patricia M.
    Baley, G. James
    Kohn, Frank C.
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2007, 233 : 208 - 208
  • [45] Glyphosate-resistant weeds and crops
    Duke, Stephen O.
    Powles, Stephen B.
    PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2008, 64 (04) : 317 - 318
  • [46] Influence of Glyphosate/Dicamba Application Rate and Timing on the Control of Glyphosate-Resistant Horseweed in Glyphosate/Dicamba-Resistant Soybean
    Hedges, Brittany K.
    Soltani, Nader
    Hooker, David C.
    Robinson, Darren E.
    Sikkema, Peter H.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 32 (06) : 678 - 682
  • [47] Influence of glyphosate-resistant cropping systems on weed species shifts and glyphosate-resistant weed populations
    Johnson, William G.
    Davis, Vince M.
    Kruger, Greg R.
    Weller, Stephen C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2009, 31 (03) : 162 - 172
  • [48] Influence of glyphosate/dicamba application rate and timing on the control of glyphosate-resistant waterhemp in glyphosate/dicamba-resistant soybean
    Hedges, Brittany K.
    Soltani, Nader
    Robinson, Darren E.
    Hooker, David C.
    Sikkema, Peter H.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2019, 99 (03) : 371 - 374
  • [49] Chemical Control of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza Canadensis) and hairy fleabane (Conyza bonariensis) biotypes
    Yamauti, Micheli Satomi
    Martins Barroso, Arthur Arrobas
    de Souza, Marcelo Claro
    da Costa Aguiar Alves, Pedro Luis
    REVISTA CIENCIA AGRONOMICA, 2010, 41 (03): : 495 - 500
  • [50] Comparison of Herbicide Programs for Weed Control in Glyphosate-Resistant Alfalfa
    Dillehay, Bryan L.
    Curran, William S.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 24 (02) : 130 - 138