Review of US ESCO industry market trends: an empirical analysis of project data

被引:114
|
作者
Goldman, CA [1 ]
Hopper, NC [1 ]
Osborn, JG [1 ]
机构
[1] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
energy efficiency; energy service companies (ESCOs); performance contracting;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2003.08.008
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This comprehensive empirical analysis of US energy service company (ESCO) industry trends and performance employs two parallel analytical approaches: a survey of firms to estimate total industry size, and a database of 1500 ESCO projects, from which we report target markets and typical project characteristics, energy savings and customer economics. We estimate that industry investment for energy-efficiency related services reached US$2 billion in 2000 following a decade of strong growth. ESCO activity is concentrated in states with high economic activity and strong policy support. Typical projects save 150-200 MJ/m(2)/year and are cost-effective with median benefit/cost ratios of 1.6 and 2.1 for institutional and private sector projects. The median simple payback time (SPT) is 7 years among institutional customers; 3 years is typical in the private sector. Reliance on DSM incentives has decreased since 1995. Preliminary evidence suggests that state enabling policies have boosted the industry in medium-sized states. ESCOs have proven resilient in the face of restructuring and will probably shift toward selling "energy solutions", with energy efficiency part of a package. We conclude that appropriate policy support-both financial and non-financial-can "jump-start" a viable private-sector energy-efficiency services industry that targets large institutional and commercial/industrial customers. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 405
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Empirical analysis of ARMA-GARCH models in market risk estimation on high-frequency US data
    Beck, Alexander
    Kim, Young Shin Aaron
    Rachev, Svetlozar
    Feindt, Michael
    Fabozzi, Frank
    [J]. STUDIES IN NONLINEAR DYNAMICS AND ECONOMETRICS, 2013, 17 (02): : 167 - 177
  • [32] An empirical analysis of market integration and efficiency for US fresh tomato markets
    Padilla-Bernal, L
    Thilmany, DD
    Loureiro, ML
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2003, 28 (03): : 435 - 450
  • [33] Empirical Analysis of the "China-US factor" in Stock Market Linkages
    Qian, Huai
    Yang, Bingkun
    Huang, Weihua
    [J]. EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2024, 60 (06) : 1118 - 1129
  • [34] Demand under product differentiation: an empirical analysis of the US wine market
    Davis, Timothy R.
    Ahmadi-Esfahani, Fredoun Z.
    Iranzo, Susana
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2008, 52 (04) : 401 - 417
  • [35] Import penetration and price relationships: An empirical analysis of the US catfish market
    Surathkal, Prasanna
    Dey, Madan M.
    [J]. AQUACULTURE ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT, 2020, 24 (02) : 143 - 160
  • [36] An Empirical Analysis of the Impacts of the Sharing Economy Platforms on the US Labor Market
    Li, Ziru
    Hong, Yili
    Zhang, Zhongju
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 51ST ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES (HICSS), 2018, : 666 - 674
  • [37] US foreign direct investment in the London legal market: An empirical analysis
    Cullen-Mandikos, B
    MacPherson, A
    [J]. PROFESSIONAL GEOGRAPHER, 2002, 54 (04): : 491 - 499
  • [38] FACTORS INFLUENCING THE MAGNITUDE OF CARTEL OVERCHARGES: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF THE US MARKET
    Bolotova, Yuliya
    Connor, John M.
    Miller, Douglas J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPETITION LAW & ECONOMICS, 2009, 5 (02) : 361 - 381
  • [39] An empirical analysis of the potential for market power in California's electricity industry
    Borenstein, S
    Bushnell, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 1999, 47 (03): : 285 - 323
  • [40] An Empirical Analysis between Market Structure and Performance in Chinese Construction Industry
    Fan, Jianshuang
    Yu, Xiaofen
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2011 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONSTRUCTION AND REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2011, : 49 - 54