Rage Against the Machine: A Reply to Professors Bierschbach and Bibas

被引：0
|
作者：
Luna, Erik [1 ]
机构：
[1] Washington & Lee Univ, Sch Law, Lexington, VA 24450 USA
来源：
MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW | 2013年 / 97卷 / 06期
关键词：
CRIMINAL-PROCEDURE; POLICE DISCRETION; 2; MODELS; SYSTEM;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号：
0301 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：2245 / 2271
页数：27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Rage Against the Machine: Berkeley 1964 and the Birth of the Free Speech Movement
    Williams, John P.
    PERSPECTIVES ON GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 17 (1-2) : 158 - 172
  • [42] Rage Against the Machine Clear: A Systematic Analysis of Machine Clears and Their Implications for Transient Execution Attacks
    Ragab, Hany
    Barberis, Enrico
    Bos, Herbert
    Giuffrida, Cristiano
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 30TH USENIX SECURITY SYMPOSIUM, 2021, : 1451 - 1468
  • [43] A 'RAGE TO PUNISH' - REPLY
    GABRIEL, RC
    NEW YORK TIMES BOOK REVIEW, 1994, : 35 - 35
  • [44] A REPLY TO PROFESSORS KIYASU AND OZAKI
    KOGA, I
    ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS IN JAPAN, 1967, 50 (01): : 142 - &
  • [45] A Reply to Professors Cain and Charles
    Lessig, Lawrence
    CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, 2014, 102 (01) : 49 - 52
  • [46] Professors' trading cards -: Reply
    Martínez-Fernández, L
    ACADEME-BULLETIN OF THE AAUP, 2004, 90 (03): : 9 - 9
  • [47] 'Rage against the machine'? The opportunities and risks concerning the automation of urban green infrastructure
    Gulsrud, Natalie Marie
    Raymond, Christopher M.
    Rutt, Rebecca L.
    Olafsson, Anton Stahl
    Plieninger, Tobias
    Sandberg, Mattias
    Beery, Thomas H.
    Jonsson, K. Ingemar
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2018, 180 : 85 - 92
  • [48] RETIRED PROFESSORS REGISTRY - REPLY
    SPITZBERG
    ACADEME-BULLETIN OF THE AAUP, 1981, 67 (02): : 119 - 119
  • [49] Rage against the Machine: Buffering, Noise, and Perpetual Anxiety in the Age of Connected Viewing
    Alexander, Neta
    CINEMA JOURNAL, 2017, 56 (02): : 1 - 24
  • [50] REPLY TO PROFESSORS PLOCHMANN AND WILD
    VERSENYI, L
    PHILOSOPHICAL FORUM, 1971, 9 (1-2): : 122 - 129
12345