Effective Control of LNG Regasification Plant using Multivariable Model Predictive Control

被引:0
|
作者
Wahid, A. [1 ]
Phenica, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Indonesia, Fac Engn, Dept Chem Engn, Depok 16424, Indonesia
关键词
D O I
10.1063/5.0013773
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Multivariable Model Predictive Control (MMPC) is used to control temperature and pressure at the LNG regasification plant to overcome the problem of interaction between variables and reduce the number of controllers. There are four controlled variables (CV) and four manipulated variables (manipulated variables, MV). The controlled variables are the pressure on the LNG storage tank, vaporizer output pressure, vaporizer output temperature, and gas temperature towards the pipeline. The manipulated variable, which are respectively paired with the CV, are the top product flow rate of the tank, pipeline gas flow rate, incoming sea water flow rate, and duty heater. Identification of the FOPDT empirical model (First Order Plus Dead-Time) is implemented on the four pairs of CVs and MVs to describe interactions between variables. The FOPDT obtained is used as a controller in MMPC and to determine the performance of MMPC tuning parameters, namely P (prediction horizon), M (control horizon), T (sampling time). Control performance is measured using the ISE (Integral Square Error) method. As a result, the MMPC parameters (P, M, T) for optimum LNG regasification condition, respectively: 330, 1, 1. The ISE results of MMPC controller in set point tracking: 2.12x10(-4), 23.834, 0.763, 0.085, with improvement of control performance respectively by 31262%, 17%, 175%, 757% compared to MPC controller performance.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Multivariable predictive feedback control
    Giovanini, LL
    [J]. FIRST IEEE INTERNATION WORKSHOP ON ELECTRONIC DESIGN, TEST AND APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 453 - 458
  • [32] Outlook for multivariable predictive control
    Kern, Allan G.
    [J]. HYDROCARBON PROCESSING, 2008, 87 (10): : 33 - 33
  • [33] Summiting with multivariable predictive control
    Kern, A. G.
    [J]. HYDROCARBON PROCESSING, 2007, 86 (06): : 63 - 64
  • [34] Multivariable weighted predictive control
    Duan, JM
    Grimble, MJ
    Johnson, MA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 1997, 7 (03) : 219 - 235
  • [35] Iterative learning model predictive control for constrained multivariable control of batch processes
    Oh, Se-Kyu
    Lee, Jong Min
    [J]. COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 93 : 284 - 292
  • [36] Dynamic Modeling and Multivariable Model Predictive Control of the Air Separation Columns in an IGCC Power Plant
    Guo, Tongshu
    Lu, Jianhong
    Xiang, Wenguo
    Ding, Weiming
    Zhang, Tiejun
    [J]. WCECS 2009: WORLD CONGRESS ON ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE, VOLS I AND II, 2009, : 989 - +
  • [37] Nonlinear Multivariable Power Plant Coordinate Control by Constrained Predictive Scheme
    Liu, Xiangjie
    Guan, Ping
    Chan, C. W.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 18 (05) : 1116 - 1125
  • [38] Improved robustness of multivariable model predictive control under model uncertainties
    Stoica, Cristina
    Rodriguez-Ayerbe, Pedro
    Dumur, Didier
    [J]. ICINCO 2007: PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATICS IN CONTROL, AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS, VOL SPSMC: SIGNAL PROCESSING, SYSTEMS MODELING AND CONTROL, 2007, : 283 - 288
  • [39] Generalized Predictive Control of a thermal plant using fuzzy model
    Matko, D
    Kavsek-Biasizzo, K
    Skrjanc, I
    Music, G
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2000 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-6, 2000, : 2053 - 2057
  • [40] Power plant coordinated predictive control using neurofuzzy model
    Liu, Xiang-Jie
    Yang, Ting-Ting
    Liu, Ji-Zhen
    [J]. WCICA 2006: SIXTH WORLD CONGRESS ON INTELLIGENT CONTROL AND AUTOMATION, VOLS 1-12, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 129 - 133