Effective Control of LNG Regasification Plant using Multivariable Model Predictive Control

被引:0
|
作者
Wahid, A. [1 ]
Phenica, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Indonesia, Fac Engn, Dept Chem Engn, Depok 16424, Indonesia
关键词
D O I
10.1063/5.0013773
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Multivariable Model Predictive Control (MMPC) is used to control temperature and pressure at the LNG regasification plant to overcome the problem of interaction between variables and reduce the number of controllers. There are four controlled variables (CV) and four manipulated variables (manipulated variables, MV). The controlled variables are the pressure on the LNG storage tank, vaporizer output pressure, vaporizer output temperature, and gas temperature towards the pipeline. The manipulated variable, which are respectively paired with the CV, are the top product flow rate of the tank, pipeline gas flow rate, incoming sea water flow rate, and duty heater. Identification of the FOPDT empirical model (First Order Plus Dead-Time) is implemented on the four pairs of CVs and MVs to describe interactions between variables. The FOPDT obtained is used as a controller in MMPC and to determine the performance of MMPC tuning parameters, namely P (prediction horizon), M (control horizon), T (sampling time). Control performance is measured using the ISE (Integral Square Error) method. As a result, the MMPC parameters (P, M, T) for optimum LNG regasification condition, respectively: 330, 1, 1. The ISE results of MMPC controller in set point tracking: 2.12x10(-4), 23.834, 0.763, 0.085, with improvement of control performance respectively by 31262%, 17%, 175%, 757% compared to MPC controller performance.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimization control of LNG regasification plant using Model Predictive Control
    Wahid, A.
    Adicandra, F. F.
    [J]. 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES AND APPLICATIONS 2017 (3RD ICCHESA 2017), 2018, 334
  • [2] Predictive Control using Mirror Plant and Application to LNG Regasification Plants
    Kobayashi, Ryosuke
    Kashiwa, Ryosuke
    Ishimaru, Shin
    Uemura, Ryota
    Nakaya, Makoto
    Miura, Shintaro
    [J]. 2017 11TH ASIAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ASCC), 2017, : 349 - 353
  • [3] Multivariable model predictive control for a gas turbine power plant
    Ghorbani, Hadi
    Ghaffari, Ali
    Rahnama, Mehdi
    [J]. ACMOS '08: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, MODELLING AND SIMULATION, 2008, : 275 - +
  • [4] Multivariable Integrated Model Predictive Control of Nuclear Power Plant
    Xia, Guoqing
    Su, Jie
    Zhang, Wei
    [J]. 2008 SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUTURE GENERATION COMMUNICATION AND NETWORKING SYMPOSIA, VOLS 1-5, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 408 - 411
  • [5] Model predictive control for multivariable processes
    VanDoren, J
    [J]. CONTROL ENGINEERING, 1997, 44 (06) : 87 - 87
  • [6] Constrained multivariable control of a distillation column using a simplified model predictive control algorithm
    Abou-Jeyab, RA
    Gupta, YP
    Gervais, JR
    Branchi, PA
    Woo, SS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 2001, 11 (05) : 509 - 517
  • [7] Multivariable PID Control Using Improved State Space Model Predictive Control Optimization
    Wu, Sheng
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2015, 54 (20) : 5505 - 5513
  • [9] Automation of reformer process in petroleum plant using fuzzy supervisory model predictive multivariable control system
    Kobayashi, T
    Tani, T
    Miyamoto, S
    [J]. NINTH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS (FUZZ-IEEE 2000), VOLS 1 AND 2, 2000, : 1021 - 1024
  • [10] Control of grinding plants using predictive multivariable neural control
    Duarte, M
    Suárez, A
    Bassi, D
    [J]. POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 115 (02) : 193 - 206