A New, Practical Animal Welfare Assessment for Dairy Farmers

被引:17
|
作者
van Eerdenburg, Frank J. C. M. [1 ]
Di Giacinto, Alice M. [2 ]
Hulsen, Jan [3 ]
Snel, Bert [4 ]
Stegeman, J. Arjan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Fac Vet Med, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, NL-3584 CL Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Wageningen Univ, Adaptat Physiol Grp, Dept Anim Sci, NL-6708 PB Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Vetvice CowSignals, NL-4614 PC Bergen Op Zoom, Netherlands
[4] DLV Advies, NL-7418 EV Deventer, Netherlands
来源
ANIMALS | 2021年 / 11卷 / 03期
关键词
animal welfare; dairy cattle; Welfare Quality(&#174); water supply; integument alterations; economic return; CATTLE WELFARE; TIME-BUDGETS; BEHAVIOR; LAMENESS; PROTOCOL; HEALTH; COWS; SENSITIVITY; PARAMETERS; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.3390/ani11030881
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Simple Summary To determine the level of welfare on a dairy farm is a complex task. There is no protocol available that can serve as a 'gold standard'. The Welfare Quality protocol is the most extensive one, but it takes about a full day to perform. We, therefore, examined if it would be possible to replace the time-consuming parts, like lengthy behavioural observations, with simple measurements in the environment. This resulted in a new Welfare Monitor that can be executed in 1.5 h on a farm with 100 cows. Welfare assessment was appreciated by the farmers, and they responded to advice for improvements on their farm. Besides promoting better welfare, this approach also led to a better financial result for the farms. The Welfare Quality(R) assessment protocol (WQ) is the most extensive way to measure animal welfare. This study was set up to determine if resource-based welfare indicators, that are easier and faster to measure, could replace the more time consuming, animal-based measurements of the WQ. The WQ was applied on 60 dairy farms in the Netherlands, with good, moderate and poor welfare. The WQ protocol classified most farms (87%) as 'acceptable'. Several of the animal-based measures of WQ correlated well with measures in the environment. Using these correlations, an alternative welfare assessment protocol (new Welfare Monitor) was designed, which takes approximately 1.5 h for a farm with 100 dairy cows. Because the opinion of farmers about welfare assessment is important if one wants to improve conditions for the cows at a farm, another objective of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of the new Welfare Monitor for the farmer. Over two years, the farms were visited, and advice was given to improve the conditions at the farm. After the first welfare assessment and advice, farmers improved the conditions for their cows substantially. Farms where the category score had increased made more improvements on average than those that did not upgrade.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 21
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A new framework for the assessment of animal welfare: Integrating existing knowledge from a practical ethics perspective
    Aerts, S
    Lips, D
    Spencer, S
    Decuypere, E
    De Tavernier, J
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 2006, 19 (01): : 67 - 76
  • [22] Rewarding farmers for high animal welfare
    Loeb, Josh
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2020, 186 (03) : 80 - 80
  • [23] Farmers to be paid for high animal welfare
    Mills, Georgina
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2018, 183 (11) : 343 - 343
  • [24] Impact of personal values and personality on motivational factors for farmers to work with farm animal welfare: a case of Swedish dairy farmers
    Hansson, H.
    Lagerkvist, C. J.
    Vesala, K. M.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2018, 27 (02) : 133 - 145
  • [25] A survey of Australian dairy farmers to investigate animal welfare risks associated with increasing scale of production
    Beggs, D. S.
    Fisher, A. D.
    Jongman, E. C.
    Hemsworth, P. H.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2015, 98 (08) : 5330 - 5338
  • [26] Trading off animal welfare and production goals: Brazilian dairy farmers' perspectives on calf dehorning
    Cardoso, Clarissa Silva
    von Keyserlingk, Marina A. G.
    Hotzel, Maria Jose
    LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2016, 187 : 102 - 108
  • [27] Welfare assessment on Japanese dairy farms using the Animal Needs Index
    Seo, T.
    Date, K.
    Daigo, T.
    Kashiwamura, F.
    Sato, S.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2007, 16 (02) : 221 - 223
  • [28] Animal welfare - definition, assessment and discussion with special regard to dairy cattle
    Mondon, Maiken
    Thoene-Reinekel, Christa
    Merle, Roswitha
    BERLINER UND MUNCHENER TIERARZTLICHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2017, 130 (9-10): : 369 - 376
  • [29] Evaluating the concept of iceberg indicators for on-farm welfare assessment of dairy cattle by farmers
    Collins, S.
    Burn, C. C.
    Cardwell, J. M.
    Bell, N. J.
    CATTLE PRACTICE, 2015, 23 : 300 - 301
  • [30] Inter-observer reliability of animal-based welfare indicators included in the Animal Welfare Indicators welfare assessment protocol for dairy goats
    Vieira, A.
    Battini, M.
    Can, E.
    Mattiello, S.
    Stilwell, G.
    ANIMAL, 2018, 12 (09) : 1942 - 1949