Dislocation of a primary total hip arthroplasty is more common in patients with a lumbar spinal fusion

被引:224
|
作者
Buckland, A. J. [1 ]
Puvanesarajah, V. [1 ,3 ]
Vigdorchik, J. [1 ]
Schwarzkopf, R. [1 ]
Jain, A. [1 ,4 ]
Klineberg, E. O. [1 ,5 ]
Hart, R. A. [1 ,6 ]
Callaghan, J. J. [1 ,7 ]
Hassanzadeh, H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Langone Med Ctr, Hosp Joint Dis, Orthopaed Surg, 306 E 15th St, New York, NY 10003 USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Div Spine Surg, Orthopaed Surg, POB 800159, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Orthopaed Surg, 102 Crane Meadow Pl, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Orthopaed Surg, 1800 Orleans St, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[5] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 4860 Y St,Suite 3800, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[6] Swedish Med Ctr, Spinal Deform, 550 17th Ave,James Tower,5th Floor, Seattle, WA 98122 USA
[7] Univ Iowa, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Orthopaed & Rehabil, 200 Hawkins Dr, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
来源
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL | 2017年 / 99-B卷 / 05期
关键词
ACETABULAR COMPONENT; PELVIC TILT; ANKYLOSING-SPONDYLITIS; REPLACEMENT; INCLINATION; ANTEVERSION; DEFORMITY; BALANCE;
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.99B5.BJJ-2016-0657.R1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims Lumbar fusion is known to reduce the variation in pelvic tilt between standing and sitting. A flexible lumbo-pelvic unit increases the stability of total hip arthroplasty (THA) when seated by increasing anterior clearance and acetabular anteversion, thereby preventing impingement of the prosthesis. Lumbar fusion may eliminate this protective pelvic movement. The effect of lumbar fusion on the stability of total hip arthroplasty has not previously been investigated. Patients and Methods The Medicare database was searched for patients who had undergone THA and spinal fusion between 2005 and 2012. PearlDiver software was used to query the database by the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) procedural code for primary THA and lumbar spinal fusion. Patients who had undergone both lumbar fusion and THA were then divided into three groups: 1 to 2 levels, 3 to 7 levels and 8+ levels of fusion. The rate of dislocation in each group was established using ICD-9-CM codes. Patients who underwent THA without spinal fusion were used as a control group. Statistical significant difference between groups was tested using the chi-squared test, and significance set at p < 0.05. Results At one-year follow-up, 14 747 patients were found to have had a THA after lumbar spinal fusion (12 079 1 to 2 levels, 2594 3 to 7 levels, 74 8+ levels). The control group consisted of 839 004 patients. The dislocation rate in the control group was 1.55%. A higher rate of dislocation was found in patients with a spinal fusion of 1 to 2 levels (2.96%, p < 0.0001) and 3 to 7 levels (4.12%, p < 0.0001). Patients with 3 to 7 levels of fusion had a higher rate of dislocation than patients with 1 to 2 levels of fusion (odds ratio (OR) = 1.60, p < 0.0001). When groups were matched for age and gender to the unfused cohort, patients with 1 to 2 levels of fusion had an OR of 1.93 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.42 to 2.32, p < 0.001), and those with 3 to 7 levels of fusion an OR of 2.77 (CI 2.04 to 4.80, p < 0.001) for dislocation. Conclusion Patients with a previous history of lumbar spinal fusion have a significantly higher rate of dislocation of their THA than age-and gender-matched patients without a lumbar spinal fusion.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 591
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Repeated posterior dislocation of total hip arthroplasty after spinal corrective long fusion with pelvic fixation
    Hiroki Furuhashi
    Daisuke Togawa
    Hiroshi Koyama
    Hironobu Hoshino
    Tatsuya Yasuda
    Yukihiro Matsuyama
    European Spine Journal, 2017, 26 : 100 - 106
  • [32] Patients Who Have Had Three or More Levels Fused During Lumbar Spinal Fusion Have Worse Functional Outcomes After Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Khan, Irfan A.
    Sutton, Ryan
    Cozzarelli, Nicholas F.
    Ciesielka, Kerri-Anne
    Parvizi, Javad
    Arshi, Armin
    Fillingham, Yale A.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2023, 38 (07): : S330 - S335
  • [33] Stability in Direct Lateral vs Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Context of Lumbar Spinal Fusion
    Goyal, Dhruv K. C.
    Divi, Srikanth N.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Hozack, William J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2022, 30 (07) : E628 - E639
  • [34] Time to Dislocation Analysis of Lumbar Spine Fusion Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: Breaking Up a Happy Home
    King, Connor A.
    Landy, David C.
    Martell, John M.
    Luu, Hue H.
    Shi, Lewis L.
    Lee, Michael J.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (12): : 3768 - 3772
  • [35] Head size and dislocation rate in primary total hip arthroplasty
    Singh, Somesh P.
    Bhalodiya, Haresh P.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2013, 47 (05) : 443 - 448
  • [36] Head size and dislocation rate in primary total hip arthroplasty
    Abhay Elhence
    Divesh Jalan
    Harish Talreja
    Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2014, 48 : 438 - 438
  • [37] Head size and dislocation rate in primary total hip arthroplasty
    Elhence, Abhay
    Jalan, Divesh
    Talreja, Harish
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2014, 48 (04) : 438 - U105
  • [38] Hospital cost of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty
    Sanchez-Sotelo, J
    Haidukewych, GJ
    Boberg, CJ
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2006, 88A (02): : 290 - 294
  • [39] Risk factors for dislocation following primary total hip arthroplasty
    Suva, Domizio L.
    Lubbeke, Anne
    Zimmermann, Doris
    Peter, Robin
    Hoffmeyer, Pierre
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2012, 142 : S19 - S19
  • [40] Considerations in spinopelvic parameters and acetabular component orientation in patients with lumbar spinal fusion following total hip arthroplasty: A retrospective study
    Huerfano, Elina
    Alzate, Ricardo
    Munoz, Juan M.
    Riveros, Emilio A.
    Marquez, Diego
    Paez, Rodolfo
    Nossa, Juan M.
    CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE, 2020, 31 (03): : 218 - 223