Recommendations for expert opinions about predictions: Empirically based recommendations for forensic expert opinions on legal prognosis

被引:21
|
作者
Kroeber, Hans-Ludwig [1 ]
Brettel, Hauke [2 ]
Rettenberger, Martin [3 ]
Stuebner, Susanne [4 ]
机构
[1] Zentrum Forens Psychiat Begutachtung, Schlossstr 50, D-12165 Berlin, Germany
[2] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz JGU, Fachbereich Rechts & Wirtschaftswissensch, Jakob Welder Weg 9, D-55099 Mainz, Germany
[3] Kriminol Zent Stelle KrimZ, Viktoriastr 35, D-65189 Wiesbaden, Germany
[4] Kbo Isar Amper Klinikum Munchen Ost, Klin Forens Psychiat & Psychotherapie, Vockestr 72, D-85540 Haar, Germany
关键词
Dangerousness; Individualized Theory of Delinquency; Risk Assessment; Probability Statement; Forecast of Criminal Relapse;
D O I
10.1007/s11757-019-00558-z
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
These recommendations show a scientifically based method and procedure to generate case-based, individual forecasts of criminal relapse. The method is to analyze the specific, individual dangerousness of a person, that has emerged in his former crimes, and to localize them in the realm of empirical knowledge about risk factors and delinquent courses of life. The forensic expert opinion has to record the specifics of the individual biography, course of delinquency, issues of mental or personality disorder, screen and motivation of former crimes, and has to transform these data into a case-based individual theory of this person's delinquency. This theory has to be adjusted to the scientific background of general experience. This individualized hypothesis of delinquency leads to an appraisal of the social behavior in the future under defined social conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 342
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Legal quality criteria of expert opinions in liability for medical malpractice
    Neu, Johann
    HANDCHIRURGIE MIKROCHIRURGIE PLASTISCHE CHIRURGIE, 2017, 49 (04) : 224 - 228
  • [22] Expert opinions of Forensic Psychiatrists Regarding Laws of Subsequent Preventive Detention
    Basdekis-Jozsa, Raphaela
    Briken, Peer
    PSYCHIATRISCHE PRAXIS, 2012, 39 (06) : 293 - 295
  • [23] More Money for Expert Opinions - About the Reform of Remuneration for Experts
    Friese, Kim-Victoria
    Wienke, Albrecht
    LARYNGO-RHINO-OTOLOGIE, 2021, 100 (03) : 222 - 223
  • [24] Scientific reasoning in legal expert opinions for the Federal Employers' Liability Insurance
    Stengel, D.
    Bauwens, K.
    Casper, D.
    Ekkernkamp, A.
    Wich, M.
    TRAUMA UND BERUFSKRANKHEIT, 2006, 8 (04) : 251 - 256
  • [25] Users opinions about Learning Object Recommendations: a case study
    dos Santos, Henrique Lemos
    Cechinel, Cristian
    Giustozzi, Franco
    Casali, Ana
    Deco, Claudia
    2016 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTERS IN EDUCATION (SIIE), 2016,
  • [26] PHARMACISTS OPINIONS ABOUT AND COMPLIANCE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS FOR INTRAVENOUS ADMIXTURE PRACTICES
    BRZOZOWSKI, DF
    HALE, KM
    SEGAL, R
    MIRTALLO, JM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 1987, 44 (09): : 2077 - 2084
  • [27] Stochastic population forecasts based on conditional expert opinions
    Billari, F. C.
    Graziani, R.
    Melilli, E.
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 2012, 175 : 491 - 511
  • [28] Interdisciplinarity and expert rating: an analysis based on faculty opinions
    Chen, Shiji
    Zhang, Kaiqi
    Qiu, Junping
    Chai, Jiaqi
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2024, 129 (11) : 6597 - 6628
  • [29] An approach to knowledge base construction based on expert opinions
    van Ast, JF
    Talmon, JL
    Renier, WO
    Hasman, A
    METHODS OF INFORMATION IN MEDICINE, 2004, 43 (04) : 427 - 432
  • [30] Expert Insight into the Assessment of Competence in Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy: A Qualitative Exploration of Experts' Experiences, Opinions and Recommendations
    Muse, Kate
    McManus, Freda
    CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY & PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2016, 23 (03) : 246 - 259