Risk factors for brucellosis in indigenous cattle reared in livestock-wildlife interface areas of Zambia

被引:76
|
作者
Muma, J. B.
Samui, K. L.
Oloya, J.
Munyeme, M.
Skjerve, E.
机构
[1] Norwegian Sch Vet Sci, Dept Food Safety & Infect Biol, N-0033 Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Zambia, Sch Vet Med, Dept Dis Control, Lusaka, Zambia
[3] Makerere Univ, Fac Vet Med, Dept Vet Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Kampala, Uganda
关键词
cattle; brucellosis; risk factor; livestock-wildlife interface; Zambia;
D O I
10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.03.003
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
We conducted this cross-sectional study to investigate risk factors of Brucella seropositivity in cattle herds reared in livestock-wildlife interface areas of Blue Lagoon and Lochinvar National Parks in Zambia between August 2003 and September 2004. Sera were collected from cattle aged >= 2 years from 124 herds. Data on husbandry practices, grazing strategies, and herd structure (sex and age composition) were also collected. Sera were screened for anti-Brucella antibodies using the Rose Bengal test (RBT) as a presumptive test and a competitive-ELISA (c-ELISA) as a confirmatory test. A herd was classified as Brucella seropositive if at least one animal tested positive on both RBT and c-ELISA in series testing. Risk factors for herd-level brucellosis seropositivity were tested using multivariable logistic regression; risk factors for increases in the within-herd counts of seropositive cattle were analyzed using the negative binomial regression model with the number of seropositive animals as outcome and total number of cattle tested in a herd as the population at risk (exposure). Of the 110 herds tested, 68 (62; 95% CI: 53, 71% after adjusting for clustering by area) tested seropositive for exposure to Brucella spp. The final logistic-regression model identified geographical area, with Lochinvar (OR = 3.4; CI: 0.97, 12) and Kazungula (OR = 4.3; CI: 0.91, 20) recording higher odds of Brucella infections compared to Blue Lagoon. Herds coming in contact with wildlife had higher odds compared to those without contact (OR = 3.4; CI: 1, 11). Similarly, the odds of Brucella infection were progressively higher in the larger herd categories (26-40 cattle, OR = 2.6; CI: 0.70, 10; 41-82 cattle, OR = 4.9; CI: 0.93, 26; > 82 cattle, OR = 9.4; CI: 1.7-51) compared to the smallest herd category (10-25). The negative binomial regression model identified geographical area, contact with wildlife, and herd size as having significant effect on counts of seropositive cattle in a herd. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 317
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cross-sectional survey of brucellosis and associated risk factors in the livestock–wildlife interface area of Nechisar National Park, Ethiopia
    Hassen Chaka
    Gezahegn Aboset
    Abebe Garoma
    Balako Gumi
    Eric Thys
    Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2018, 50 : 1041 - 1049
  • [32] Gender and zoonotic pathogen risk in a resource-limited community at the livestock-wildlife interface, Mpumalanga, South Africa: a qualitative analysis
    Oruganti, Pallavi
    Berrian, Amanda
    Root, Elisabeth
    Ndlovu, Violet
    Mbhungele, Philemon
    Van Wyk, Ilana
    LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH, 2020, 8 : 31 - 31
  • [33] Zoonotic Pathogen Seroprevalence in Cattle in a Wildlife–Livestock Interface, Kenya
    Daniel Nthiwa
    Silvia Alonso
    David Odongo
    Eucharia Kenya
    Bernard Bett
    EcoHealth, 2019, 16 : 712 - 725
  • [34] Cattle Drive Salmonella Infection in the Wildlife-Livestock Interface
    Mentaberre, G.
    Porrero, M. C.
    Navarro-Gonzalez, N.
    Serrano, E.
    Dominguez, L.
    Lavin, S.
    ZOONOSES AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 60 (07) : 510 - 518
  • [35] Livestock-wildlife conflicts in the Ethiopian highlands: assessing the dietary and spatial overlap between mountain nyala and cattle
    Atickem, Anagaw
    Loe, Leif E.
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2014, 52 (03) : 343 - 351
  • [36] Prevalence and significant geospatial clusters of bovine tuberculosis infection at livestock-wildlife interface ecosystem in Eastern Tanzania
    Mwakapuja, Richard Simon
    Makondo, Zachariah Ephraim
    Malakalinga, Joseph
    Bryssinckx, Ward
    Mdegela, Robinson Hammerthon
    Moser, Irmgard
    Kazwala, Rudovick Reuben
    Tanner, Manfred
    TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2013, 45 (05) : 1223 - 1230
  • [37] Risk Factors for Zoonotic Tuberculosis at the Wildlife-Livestock-Human Interface in South Africa
    Sichewo, Petronillah R.
    Michel, Anita L.
    Musoke, Jolly
    Etter, Eric M. C.
    PATHOGENS, 2019, 8 (03):
  • [38] Zoonotic Pathogen Seroprevalence in Cattle in a Wildlife-Livestock Interface, Kenya
    Nthiwa, Daniel
    Alonso, Silvia
    Odongo, David
    Kenya, Eucharia
    Bett, Bernard
    ECOHEALTH, 2019, 16 (04) : 712 - 725
  • [39] Antibiotic treatment of Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae in domestic sheep (Ovis aries): Working at the livestock-wildlife interface in Yukon, Canada
    Magnusson, Kristenn
    Harms, N. Jane
    Thompson, Michelle
    CANADIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL-REVUE VETERINAIRE CANADIENNE, 2023, 64 (12):
  • [40] Transmission Dynamics of Rhodesian Sleeping Sickness at the Interface of Wildlife and Livestock Areas
    Auty, Harriet
    Morrison, Liam J.
    Torr, Stephen J.
    Lord, Jennifer
    TRENDS IN PARASITOLOGY, 2016, 32 (08) : 608 - 621