Stable inverse probability weighting estimation for longitudinal studies

被引:13
|
作者
Avagyan, Vahe [1 ]
Vansteelandt, Stijn [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ & Res, Biometris Math & Stat Methods Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Ghent, Dept Appl Math Comp Sci & Stat, Ghent, Belgium
[3] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Med Stat, London, England
关键词
calibration estimation; covariate balancing; inverse probability weighting; propensity score; DEMYSTIFYING DOUBLE ROBUSTNESS; PROPENSITY SCORE; CAUSAL INFERENCE; ALTERNATIVE STRATEGIES; CALIBRATION ESTIMATORS; ASSOCIATION; NONRESPONSE; EFFICIENCY; FRAMEWORK; MODELS;
D O I
10.1111/sjos.12542
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
We consider estimation of the average effect of time-varying dichotomous exposure on outcome using inverse probability weighting (IPW) under the assumption that there is no unmeasured confounding of the exposure-outcome association at each time point. Despite the popularity of IPW, its performance is often poor due to instability of the estimated weights. We develop an estimating equation-based strategy for the nuisance parameters indexing the weights at each time point, aimed at preventing highly volatile weights and ensuring the stability of IPW estimation. Our proposed approach targets the estimation of the counterfactual mean under a chosen treatment regime and requires fitting a separate propensity score model at each time point. We discuss and examine extensions to enable the fitting of marginal structural models using one propensity score model across all time points. Extensive simulation studies demonstrate adequate performance of our approach compared with the maximum likelihood propensity score estimator and the covariate balancing propensity score estimator.
引用
收藏
页码:1046 / 1067
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Random weighting estimation of stable exponent
    Hu, Gaoge
    Gao, Shesheng
    Zhong, Yongmin
    Gu, Chengfan
    METRIKA, 2014, 77 (04) : 451 - 468
  • [42] Random weighting estimation of stable exponent
    Gaoge Hu
    Shesheng Gao
    Yongmin Zhong
    Chengfan Gu
    Metrika, 2014, 77 : 451 - 468
  • [43] Inverse Probability Weighting Enhances Absolute Risk Estimation in Three Common Study Designs of Nosocomial Infections
    Staus, Paulina
    von Cube, Maja
    Hazard, Derek
    Doerken, Sam
    Ershova, Ksenia
    Balmford, James
    Wolkewitz, Martin
    CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 14 : 1053 - 1064
  • [44] Estimation of Overall Survival with Subsequent Treatment Effect by Applying Inverse Probability of Censoring Weighting in the LATITUDE Study
    Koroki, Yosuke
    Taguri, Masataka
    Matsubara, Nobuaki
    Fizazi, Karim
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 36 : 51 - 58
  • [45] Estimation of overall survival with subsequent treatment effect by applying inverse probability of censoring weighting in the LATITUDE study
    Matsubara, N.
    Koroki, Y.
    Taguri, M.
    Fizazi, K.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2021, 32 : S662 - S662
  • [46] ON PI-INVERSE WEIGHTING VERSUS BEST LINEAR UNBIASED WEIGHTING IN PROBABILITY SAMPLING
    SARNDAL, CE
    BIOMETRIKA, 1980, 67 (03) : 639 - 650
  • [47] Using Inverse Probability Weighting To Estimate Warfarin Adverse Effects: Concerns with Large and Variable Inverse Probability Weights
    Delaney, Joseph A. C.
    Platt, Robert W.
    Suissa, Samy
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2010, 19 : S227 - S227
  • [48] Inverse probability weighting or multiple imputations for nonmonotone missing data?
    Ross, Rachael
    Cole, Stephen
    Westreich, Daniel
    Daniels, Julie
    Stringer, Jeffrey
    Edwards, Jessie
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2022, 31 : 3 - 3
  • [49] A Primer on Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting and Marginal Structural Models
    Thoemmes, Felix
    Ong, Anthony D.
    EMERGING ADULTHOOD, 2016, 4 (01) : 40 - 59
  • [50] Adjusted win ratio using the inverse probability of treatment weighting
    Wang, Duolao
    Zheng, Sirui
    Cui, Ying
    He, Nengjie
    Chen, Tao
    Huang, Bo
    JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2025, 35 (01) : 21 - 36