Assessing Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Health Co-Benefits: A Structured Review of Lifestyle-Related Climate Change Mitigation Strategies

被引:51
|
作者
Quam, Vivian G. M. [1 ,2 ]
Rocklov, Joacim [1 ]
Quam, Mikkel B. M. [1 ]
Lucas, Rebekah A. I. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Umea Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Clin Med Epidemiol & Global Hlth, S-90187 Umea, Sweden
[2] Univ Georgia, Coll Vet Med, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[3] Univ Birmingham, Sch Sport Exercise & Rehabil Sci, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
diet; active transport; co-benefits; climate change mitigation; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; MEAT CONSUMPTION; LAND-USE; DIET; IMPACT; ENERGY; FOOD; CAR; MORTALITY; TRANSPORT;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph14050468
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This is the first structured review to identify and summarize research on lifestyle choices that improve health and have the greatest potential to mitigate climate change. Two literature searches were conducted on: (1) active transport health co-benefits, and (2) dietary health co-benefits. Articles needed to quantify both greenhouse gas emissions and health or nutrition outcomes resulting from active transport or diet changes. A data extraction tool (PRISMA) was created for article selection and evaluation. A rubric was devised to assess the biases, limitations and uncertainties of included articles. For active transport 790 articles were retrieved, nine meeting the inclusion criteria. For diet 2524 articles were retrieved, 23 meeting the inclusion criteria. A total of 31 articles were reviewed and assessed using the rubric, as one article met the inclusion criteria for both active transport and diet co-benefits. Methods used to estimate the effect of diet or active transport modification vary greatly precluding meta-analysis. The scale of impact on health and greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE) outcomes depends predominately on the aggressiveness of the diet or active transport scenario modelled, versus the modelling technique. Effective mitigation policies, infrastructure that supports active transport and low GHGE food delivery, plus community engagement are integral in achieving optimal health and GHGE outcomes. Variation in culture, nutritional and health status, plus geographic density will determine which mitigation scenario(s) best suit individual communities.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Greenhouse gas mitigation co-benefits across the global agricultural development programs
    Khatri-Chhetri, Arun
    Costa Junior, Ciniro
    Wollenberg, Eva
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2022, 76
  • [42] Assessing life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in the Norwegian defence sector for climate change mitigation
    Sparrevik, Magnus
    Utstol, Simon
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 248 (248)
  • [43] The importance of health co-benefits in macroeconomic assessments of UK Greenhouse Gas emission reduction strategies
    Henning Tarp Jensen
    Marcus R. Keogh-Brown
    Richard D. Smith
    Zaid Chalabi
    Alan D. Dangour
    Mike Davies
    Phil Edwards
    Tara Garnett
    Moshe Givoni
    Ulla Griffiths
    Ian Hamilton
    James Jarrett
    Ian Roberts
    Paul Wilkinson
    James Woodcock
    Andy Haines
    Climatic Change, 2013, 121 : 223 - 237
  • [44] The importance of health co-benefits in macroeconomic assessments of UK Greenhouse Gas emission reduction strategies
    Jensen, Henning Tarp
    Keogh-Brown, Marcus R.
    Smith, Richard D.
    Chalabi, Zaid
    Dangour, Alan D.
    Davies, Mike
    Edwards, Phil
    Garnett, Tara
    Givoni, Moshe
    Griffiths, Ulla
    Hamilton, Ian
    Jarrett, James
    Roberts, Ian
    Wilkinson, Paul
    Woodcock, James
    Haines, Andy
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2013, 121 (02) : 223 - 237
  • [45] Co-benefits and synergies between urban climate change mitigation and adaptation measures: A literature review
    Sharifi, Ayyoob
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 750
  • [46] Review of trade-offs and co-benefits from greenhouse gas mitigation measures in agricultural production
    Verspecht, Ann
    Vandermeulen, Valerie
    Ter Avest, Erik
    Van Huylenbroeck, Guido
    JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2012, 9 : 147 - 157
  • [47] Health and Climate Change 2 Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: urban land transport
    Woodcock, James
    Edwards, Phil
    Tonne, Cathryn
    Armstrong, Ben G.
    Ashiru, Olu
    Banister, David
    Beevers, Sean
    Chalabi, Zaid
    Chowdhury, Zohir
    Cohen, Aaron
    Franco, Oscar H.
    Haines, Andy
    Hickman, Robin
    Lindsay, Graeme
    Mittal, Ishaan
    Mohan, Dinesh
    Tiwari, Geetam
    Woodward, Alistair
    Roberts, Ian
    LANCET, 2009, 374 (9705): : 1930 - 1943
  • [48] Strategies for greenhouse gas emissions mitigation in Mediterranean agriculture: A review
    Sanz-Cobena, A.
    Lassaletta, L.
    Aguilera, E.
    del Prado, A.
    Garnier, J.
    Billen, G.
    Iglesias, A.
    Sanchez, B.
    Guardia, G.
    Abalos, D.
    Plaza-Bonilla, D.
    Puigdueta-Bartolome, I.
    Moral, R.
    Galan, E.
    Arriaga, H.
    Merino, P.
    Infante-Amate, J.
    Meijide, A.
    Pardo, G.
    Alvaro-Fuentes, J.
    Gilsanz, C.
    Baez, D.
    Doltra, J.
    Gonzalez-Ubierna, S.
    Cayuela, M. L.
    Menendez, S.
    Diaz-Pines, E.
    Le-Noe, J.
    Quemada, M.
    Estelles, F.
    Calvet, S.
    van Grinsven, H. J. M.
    Westhoek, H.
    Sanz, M. J.
    Gimeno, B. S.
    Vallejo, A.
    Smith, P.
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 238 : 5 - 24
  • [49] The Built Environment, Climate Change, and Health Opportunities for Co-Benefits
    Younger, Margalit
    Morrow-Almeida, Heather R.
    Vindigni, Stephen M.
    Dannenberg, Andrew L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2008, 35 (05) : 517 - 526
  • [50] Health Co-Benefits of Policies to Mitigate Climate Change in the Transport Sector: Systematic Review
    Shaw, Caroline
    Hales, Simon
    Edwards, Richard
    Howden-Chapman, Philippa
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT & HEALTH, 2017, 5 : S107 - S108