Allocating recycled significance levels in group sequential procedures for multiple endpoints

被引:19
|
作者
Xi, Dong [1 ]
Tamhane, Ajit C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Novartis Pharmaceut, IIS Stat Methodol, E Hanover, NJ 07936 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Ind Engn & Management Sci, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
关键词
Error spending function; Familywise error rate; Graphical approach; O'Brien-Fleming boundary; Pocock boundary; Recycling; CLINICAL-TRIALS; ADAPTIVE EXTENSIONS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1002/bimj.201300157
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Graphical approaches have been proposed in the literature for testing hypotheses on multiple endpoints by recycling significance levels from rejected hypotheses to unrejected ones. Recently, they have been extended to group sequential procedures (GSPs). Our focus in this paper is on the allocation of recycled significance levels from rejected hypotheses to the stages of the GSPs for unrejected hypotheses. We propose a delayed recycling method that allocates the recycled significance level from Stage r onward, where r is prespecified. We show that r cannot be chosen adaptively to coincide with the random stage at which the hypothesis from which the significance level is recycled is rejected. Such an adaptive GSP does not always control the FWER. One can choose r to minimize the expected sample size for a given power requirement. We illustrate how a simulation approach can be used for this purpose. Several examples, including a clinical trial example, are given to illustrate the proposed procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 107
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Group sequential designs for clinical trials with bivariate endpoints
    Hu, Junxiao
    Blatchford, Patrick J.
    Goldenberg, Neil A.
    Kittelson, John M.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2020, 39 (26) : 3823 - 3839
  • [22] Basic concepts of group sequential and adaptive group sequential test procedures
    Wassmer, G
    [J]. STATISTICAL PAPERS, 2000, 41 (03) : 253 - 279
  • [23] Basic concepts of group sequential and adaptive group sequential test procedures
    Gernot Wassmer
    [J]. Statistical Papers, 2000, 41 : 253 - 279
  • [24] Procedures for testing multiple endpoints in clinical trials: An overview
    Wassmer, G
    Reitmeir, P
    Kieser, M
    Lehmacher, W
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 1999, 82 (1-2) : 69 - 81
  • [25] Sequential monitoring of clinical trials with multiple survival endpoints
    Williams, PL
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1996, 15 (21-22) : 2341 - 2357
  • [26] Interim evaluation of efficacy or futility in group-sequential trials with multiple co-primary endpoints
    Asakura, Koko
    Hamasaki, Toshimitsu
    Evans, Scott R.
    [J]. BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 59 (04) : 703 - 731
  • [27] Group sequential Holm and Hochberg procedures
    Tamhane, Ajit C.
    Xi, Dong
    Gou, Jiangtao
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 40 (24) : 5333 - 5350
  • [28] Choice of futility boundaries for group sequential designs with two endpoints
    Schueler, Svenja
    Kieser, Meinhard
    Rauch, Geraldine
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2017, 17
  • [29] Choice of futility boundaries for group sequential designs with two endpoints
    Svenja Schüler
    Meinhard Kieser
    Geraldine Rauch
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17
  • [30] Multiple testing procedures for adaptive enrichment designs: combining group sequential and reallocation approaches
    Rosenblum, Michael
    Qian, Tianchen
    Du, Yu
    Qiu, Huitong
    Fisher, Aaron
    [J]. BIOSTATISTICS, 2016, 17 (04) : 650 - 662