Decision-makers' perspectives on the use of bioaccessibility for risk-based regulation of contaminated land

被引:45
|
作者
Latawiec, Agnieszka E. [1 ]
Simmons, Peter [1 ]
Reid, Brian J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ E Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
关键词
Bioaccessibility; Contaminated land; Local authorities; Regulatory decision-making; ARSENIC BIOACCESSIBILITY; EXTRACTION TEST; BIOAVAILABILITY; MANAGEMENT; SOILS; METALS; LEAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.envint.2010.02.007
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Information on contaminant bioaccessibility has been recognized by researchers, legislators and regulators as a decision-support tool for contaminated land assessment and has been subject to interest and discussion at both national and international levels. A sustainable, proportionate and risk-based approach to contaminated land management has been adopted by contaminated land regimes throughout the world. While this approach guides national and international priorities, its practical implementation in many countries, including the United Kingdom, is reliant upon local authorities. Here, we present an investigation into the views of local authorities in England and Wales regarding the practical application of bioaccessibility and constraints associated with its implementation. The research involved an online survey followed by semi-structured interviews with selected respondents. A majority of survey respondents (70%) perceived bioaccessibility to be a useful tool that facilitates contaminated land management. However, 76% of participants indicated a need for more information regarding bioaccessibility as well as emphasising a need for more research into polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Lack of statutory guidance was indicated by 78% of respondents as the main factor hampering the use of bioaccessibility data in regulatory decision-making. Divergence of policy-maker and local regulator perceptions of bioaccessibility was also indicated by the respondents. This research brings the voice of front-line regulators for contaminated land into the on-going discussion between policy-makers and scientists on the uses of bioaccessibility. This study concludes by proposing action priorities both for the research community and for policy-makers, which are transferable to risk-based regimes elsewhere. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:383 / 389
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Stochastic Economic Ranking Addresses Risk and Uncertainty for Decision-Makers
    Narayanan, Mahesh
    Abdulazeez, Mehaboob
    Bukhamsin, Khadija
    JPT, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2023, 75 (12): : 60 - 63
  • [32] At What Level Will Decision-Makers Be Able to Use Uncertainty Information?
    Lowell, K. E.
    MODSIM 2007: INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION: LAND, WATER AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT: INTEGRATED SYSTEMS FOR SUSTAINABILITY, 2007, : 2666 - 2672
  • [33] Inexperienced decision-makers' use of positive heuristics for marketing decisions
    Gilbert-Saad, Antoine
    McNaughton, Rod B.
    Siedlok, Frank
    MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2021, 59 (07) : 1706 - 1727
  • [34] Decision model for partner selection based on preference information of decision-makers
    School of Management, Harbin Inst. of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
    Xi Tong Cheng Yu Dian Zi Ji Shu/Syst Eng Electron, 2009, 3 (602-605+732):
  • [35] The use of control charts by laypeople and hospital decision-makers for guiding decision making
    Schmidtke, K. A.
    Watson, D. G.
    Vlaev, I.
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 70 (07): : 1114 - 1128
  • [36] A risk-based approach to land-use planning
    Hauptmanns, U
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2005, 125 (1-3) : 1 - 9
  • [37] The role of emotion in urban development decision-making: A qualitative exploration of the perspectives of decision-makers
    Brooks, Cat Papastavrou
    Kidger, Judi
    Hickman, Matthew
    Le Gouais, Anna
    HEALTH & PLACE, 2024, 89
  • [38] The experiences and perspectives of family surrogate decision-makers: A systematic review of qualitative studies
    Su, Ya
    Yuki, Michiko
    Hirayama, Kengo
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2020, 103 (06) : 1070 - 1081
  • [39] Web-based outreach for orchard management decision-makers
    Jones, Wendy E.
    Chambers, Ute
    Gadino, Angela
    Brunner, Jay F.
    BIOLOGICAL CONTROL, 2016, 102 : 112 - 120
  • [40] Tradeoffs for Downside Risk-Averse Decision-Makers and the Self-Protection Decision
    Denuit, Michel M.
    Eeckhoudt, Louis
    Liu, Liqun
    Meyer, Jack
    GENEVA RISK AND INSURANCE REVIEW, 2016, 41 (01): : 19 - 47