Decision-makers' perspectives on the use of bioaccessibility for risk-based regulation of contaminated land

被引:45
|
作者
Latawiec, Agnieszka E. [1 ]
Simmons, Peter [1 ]
Reid, Brian J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ E Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
关键词
Bioaccessibility; Contaminated land; Local authorities; Regulatory decision-making; ARSENIC BIOACCESSIBILITY; EXTRACTION TEST; BIOAVAILABILITY; MANAGEMENT; SOILS; METALS; LEAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.envint.2010.02.007
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Information on contaminant bioaccessibility has been recognized by researchers, legislators and regulators as a decision-support tool for contaminated land assessment and has been subject to interest and discussion at both national and international levels. A sustainable, proportionate and risk-based approach to contaminated land management has been adopted by contaminated land regimes throughout the world. While this approach guides national and international priorities, its practical implementation in many countries, including the United Kingdom, is reliant upon local authorities. Here, we present an investigation into the views of local authorities in England and Wales regarding the practical application of bioaccessibility and constraints associated with its implementation. The research involved an online survey followed by semi-structured interviews with selected respondents. A majority of survey respondents (70%) perceived bioaccessibility to be a useful tool that facilitates contaminated land management. However, 76% of participants indicated a need for more information regarding bioaccessibility as well as emphasising a need for more research into polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Lack of statutory guidance was indicated by 78% of respondents as the main factor hampering the use of bioaccessibility data in regulatory decision-making. Divergence of policy-maker and local regulator perceptions of bioaccessibility was also indicated by the respondents. This research brings the voice of front-line regulators for contaminated land into the on-going discussion between policy-makers and scientists on the uses of bioaccessibility. This study concludes by proposing action priorities both for the research community and for policy-makers, which are transferable to risk-based regimes elsewhere. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:383 / 389
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] GEOLOGIC PRINCIPLES FOR PRUDENT LAND-USE - A DECISION-MAKERS RESPONSIBILITY
    BROWN, RD
    KOCKELMAN, WJ
    ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY AND WATER SCIENCES, 1986, 8 (04): : 173 - 174
  • [2] Predicting decision-makers? algorithm use
    Neumann, Marvin
    Niessen, Susan M.
    Meijer, Rob R.
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2023, 145
  • [3] Risk-based remedial targets for contaminated land
    Madear, Camelia
    Madear, Gelu
    QUALITY-ACCESS TO SUCCESS, 2019, 20 : 241 - 246
  • [4] The use of land evaluation information by land use planners and decision-makers: a case study in Santa Catarina, Brazil
    Bacic, ILZ
    Rossiter, DG
    Bregt, AK
    SOIL USE AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 19 (01) : 12 - 18
  • [5] On the state of the art: risk communication to decision-makers
    Bier, VM
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2001, 71 (02) : 151 - 157
  • [6] Energy transitioning: communicating risk to decision-makers
    Osman, Magda
    JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2024, : 637 - 642
  • [7] REALITIES OF CONFLICT RISK AND MILITARY DECISION-MAKERS
    Schelhase, Marc
    RUSI JOURNAL, 2014, 159 (02): : 44 - 51
  • [8] URBAN STATISTICS AND THEIR TREATMENT AND USE FOR DECISION-MAKERS
    CARR, FJ
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE SERIES B-APPLICATION, 1970, 16 (12): : B752 - B762
  • [9] Clarity versus complexity: Land-use modeling as a practical tool for decision-makers
    Sohl, Terry L.
    Claggett, Peter R.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 129 : 235 - 243
  • [10] Integrated Optimization of Procurement and Distribution Based on Risk Attitude of Decision-Makers
    Zhou, Baogang
    Yan, Huigui
    Sun, Qi
    Yang, Xihuai
    NINTH WUHAN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-BUSINESS, VOLS I-III, 2010, : 2885 - 2890